creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Patrick Buchanan
Pat Buchanan
25 May 2012
The Unraveling Myth of Watergate

It was, they said, the crime of the century. An attempted coup d'etat by Richard Nixon, stopped by two … Read More.

22 May 2012
What If Zimmerman Walks Free?

Three months ago, George Zimmerman, a neighborhood watch volunteer in Sanford, Fla., shot and killed Trayvon Martin. Handcuffed,… Read More.

18 May 2012
Has the Bell Begun to Toll for the GOP?

Among the more controversial chapters in "Suicide of a Superpower," my book published last fall, … Read More.

Remembering Wars and Warriors

Share Comment

Since America became a nation, four of her greatest generals have served two terms as president: George Washington, Andrew Jackson, Ulysses Grant and Dwight David Eisenhower.

Not one of these generals led America into a new war.

Washington was heroic in keeping the young republic out of the wars that erupted in Europe after the French Revolution, as were his successors John Adams and Thomas Jefferson.

Jackson, arguably America's greatest soldier — who won the Battle of New Orleans, which preserved the Union, and virtually annexed Florida — resisted until his final days in office recognizing the Republic of Texas, liberated by his great friend and subaltern Sam Houston.

Jackson wanted no war with Mexico.

Eisenhower came to office determined to end the war in Korea. In six months, he succeeded — and kept America out of the raging war in Indochina.

Of the men who led us into our 19th century wars — the War of 1812, the Mexican War, the Civil War and the Spanish-American War — only one, William McKinley, was a soldier who had seen combat.

McKinley had enlisted at 17. In 1862, he was with the Union army at Antietam, the bloodiest battle ever fought on American soil.

Though derided as having "the backbone of a chocolate eclair" by the bellicose Theodore Roosevelt, McKinley confided to a friend before going to war with Spain: "I have been through one war. ... I have seen the bodies piled up. I do not want to see another."

James Madison, who took us into the War of 1812, which came close to tearing apart the Union; James Polk, who took us to war with Mexico and gave us Texas to the Rio Grande, the Southwest and California; and Abraham Lincoln, who led the nation in its bloodiest war, were politicians. Lincoln had served three months in the Illinois Militia in the Black Hawk War, but he never saw action.

America was led into the world wars by Woodrow Wilson, a professor, and Franklin Roosevelt, a politician. Harry Truman, who took us into Korea, had captained an artillery battery in France in 1918. John F. Kennedy, who led us into Vietnam, had served on a PT boat in the Solomons. George H.W. Bush, who launched Desert Storm, was one of the youngest Navy pilots to fight in the Pacific war.

While Americans this Memorial Day put flags out for all of their war dead, the arguments do not cease over the wisdom of the wars in which they fought and died.

In the grammar and high schools we attended in the 1940s and early 1950s, they were all good wars, all just wars, all necessary wars.

Perhaps that is how it should be taught to America's children.

Yet, if the Revolution was a great and good cause, men fighting for freedom and nationhood, the War of 1812, where we were a de facto ally of Napoleon, seems a less noble endeavor. For among our motives was seizing Canada while the Mother Country was diverted.

Though deplored today, the Mexican War was not an unjust war.

Far from stealing Mexican territory after our victory, we paid for it, and the Mexicans, five years later, agreed to the Gadsden Purchase and offered to sell us Baja California. The greed was in Mexico City.

As for America's Civil War, this quarrel will never end. Did not the South have the same right to secede from the Union as the 13 colonies did to secede from England? Did Lincoln have the right to use blockade and invasion to drive Old Dixie down? His predecessor James Buchanan did not think so.

Was the Civil War essential to ending slavery, when many states had already abolished it by legislation and every nation in the hemisphere ended it without a civil war, save for Haiti?

The Spanish-American War, begun over a falsehood — that Spain blew up the USS Maine in Havana harbor — ended with American soldiers and Marines fighting for years to deny Filipinos the freedom for which our fathers fought in the Revolution. Cuba was liberated, but the Philippines, 10,000 miles from Washington, was annexed. That was an imperial war.

In 1917, we declared war on Germany "to make the world safe for democracy." And our major allies were four of the largest empires on earth: the British, French, Russian and Japanese. We deposed the Kaiser, and got Lenin, Stalin, Mussolini, Hitler and World War II.

As a result of these world wars, all the Western empires fell, and Western Civilization began its inexorable advance to the grave. Impending bankruptcy aside, not one Western nation has a birth rate that will enable its native-born to survive many more generations. We did it to ourselves.

About Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan — and the presidents who fought those wars, LBJ, Richard Nixon and George W. Bush — the divisions are still deep and emotions raw. Today is not the time to re-fight them, but to honor and pray for the patriots who, throughout our history, did their duty, fought and died in them. Requiescant in pace.

Patrick Buchanan is the author of the book "Churchill, Hitler and 'The Unnecessary War." To find out more about Patrick Buchanan, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM


Comments

4 Comments | Post Comment
Speaking of 'wars and wariiors' --are we noticing that 'Populist/America-Firster' Pat
is ACTUALLY playing 'Conservative' frontman and apologist for our decades long sellout
and suck-up to history's --MOST-- awesomely genocidal regime ---ACROSS the Pacific?
As much as we might agree with -some- of his 'stated' positions, it's impossible NOT to
notice he's forever tut-tutting the Korean situation -pooh-poohing the looming, indeed,
gargantuan implications ---and scandalously downsizing the massive 'peacetime' genocide
in our 'fave' captive mass market.
Of course, in this he's reading from the same page of the same playbook as the lowest
mercenary sleaze of our PC franchise slum movie industry.
"The Americans came just like a whore,
all dressed up and knocking at out back door--"
-Chou En Lai
Nixon/MAO Summit
1972
--PAT was there!
On this, the once again 'mysteriously overlooked' 60th Anniversary of the staggeringly
relevant, indeed, STILL unfolding KOREAN WAR --need we say more?
-AMEN-
Comment: #1
Posted by: tiger tim
Sat May 29, 2010 6:37 PM
South korea is vastly more powerful than North Korea. Although their military is only about one quarter the size of N. Korea's military, what they lack in size, the can overcome with the actual ability to deliver force where needed. North Korea would be foolish to attack the South. They would be decimated. North Korea also denies sinking the S. Korean ship. China and Russia believe them. It's funny that just before when this took place, over in Japan they were debating whether to have the US remove it's troops from Okinowa. What's more funny is that with unrest brewing in the area, the Japanese decided to renew the lease for US troops. Coincidence? Hardly. So, here we go again, borrowing more money from foriegners so we can keep bases that have been useless for over 60 years. Why do we have to spend (borrow?) more that the next ten nations put together on their military? Maybe only 5 times as much would be enough. I don't know about you, but I'm tired of being taxed to death to pay for it.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Steve Grekko
Wed Jun 2, 2010 6:15 AM
There are very few that I agree with as often as Pat Buchanan. The other thing to mention is that there are VERY FEW war presidents that people liked and history remembers positively.

Even FDR is surrounded by so much hype that people forget just how threatening he could be in trying to stack the supreme court and bringing alot of social programs. Though FDR does get credit for dismantling as many programs as he created unlike LBJ who asked no work and no responsibility and no dignity for the great society.

These presidents state their failed administrations on war just as Carter staked his failed administration on Israel/egypt peace inviting us into a unsolvable Israeli quagmire where we were once objective, distant and allowed to play the many national interests in the region.

Yes honor the soldiers...they gave their life for the failed president you elected.
Comment: #3
Posted by: PBuchananLDobbs
Fri Jun 4, 2010 8:45 PM
I haven't read Mr Buchanan's book yet, but I would add to his list of specious wars and military actions involving the US.
Vietnam (Tonkin Resolution), Grenada ( American students at risk), Panama ( Need to silence Geo. Bush Snrs favorite coke dealer and get the canal back), First Gulf War (Giving Saddam the wink over Kuwait), Second Gulf War (non-existant WMD). On a cooler note, Cuba could have been pro-American all these years if the US had not supported Hershey, United Fruit, Boise-Cascade and the Mafia against Castro, likewise sabotaging Nasser's Aswan plans (and the British) put Egypt into Moscow's camp and ensured two middle-Eastern wars.
Regarding WW2, there is very strong evidence that Britain was reading Japanese codes for a year before Pearl Harbour and passing the material to the US. Some proof exists in that there are absolutely no Japanese decrypts in British files nor in American files for the vital three weeks before PH. The old conspiracy theory lives! ?
Comment: #4
Posted by: Terence
Sun Jul 4, 2010 12:27 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Pat Buchanan
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Roland Martin
Roland S. MartinUpdated 20 Jun 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 27 May 2012

1 Jul 2008 The Wars of Religion Return

5 Dec 2008 Can This Marriage Last?

12 Feb 2008 Huck's Hour of Power