creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Patrick Buchanan
Pat Buchanan
14 Feb 2012
On to Tehran -- or Is It Damascus?

Our War Party has been temporarily diverted from its clamor for war on Iran by the insurrection against the … Read More.

10 Feb 2012
Obama's Trampling on God's Turf Now

Yes, Virginia, there is a religious war going on. It is for the soul of America. And traditional Christianity … Read More.

7 Feb 2012
Who Wants War With Iran?

Appearing alongside CIA Director David Petraeus before the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence last week, … Read More.

Playing by Obama's Rules

Share Comment

To observe Democrats this week, savaging one of their heroines, is to understand why the party is unready to rule.

Consider: At the 1984 Democratic convention in San Francisco, an unknown member of Congress was vaulted into history by being chosen the first woman ever to run on a national party ticket.

Geraldine Ferraro became a household name. And though the Mondale-Ferraro ticket went down to a 49-state defeat, "Gerry" became an icon to Democratic women.

This week, however, after being subjected for 48 hours to accusations of divisiveness by Barack Obama, and racism by his agents and auxiliaries in the media, Ferraro resigned from Clinton's campaign. What had she said to send the Obamaites into paroxysms of rage?

She stated an obvious truth: Had Barack not been a black male, he probably would not be the front-runner for the nomination.

Here are the words that sent her to the scaffold.

"If Obama was a white man he would not be in this position. And if he was a woman (of any color) he would not be in this position. He happens to be very lucky to be who he is. And the country is caught up with the concept."

Note that Ferraro did not say race was the only reason Barack was succeeding. She simply said that being an African-American has been as indispensable to his success as her being a woman was to her success in 1984. Had my name been "Gerald" rather than Geraldine, I would not have been on the '84 ticket, Ferraro conceded.

In calling her comments racist, Barack's retinue is asserting that his race has nothing to do with his success, even implying that it is racist to suggest it. This is preposterous.

What Geraldine Ferraro said is palpably true, and everyone knows it.

Was the fact that Barack is black irrelevant to the party's decision to give a state senator the keynote address at the 2004 convention? Did Barack's being African-American have nothing to do with his running up 91 percent of the black vote in Mississippi on Tuesday?

Did Barack's being black have nothing to do with the decision of civil rights legend John Lewis to dump Hillary and endorse him, though Lewis talks of how his constituents do not want to lose this first great opportunity to have an African-American president?

Can political analysts explain why Barack will sweep Philly in the Pennsylvania primary, though Hillary has the backing of the African-American mayor and Gov.

Ed Rendell, without referring to Barack's ethnic appeal to black voters?

What else explains why the mainstream media are going so ga-ga over Obama they are being satirized on "Saturday Night Live"?

Barack Obama has a chance of being the first black president. And holding out that special hope has been crucial to his candidacy. To deny this is self-delusion — or deceit.

Nor is this unusual. John F. Kennedy would not have gotten 78 percent of the Catholic vote had he not been Catholic. Hillary would not have rolled up those margins among white women in New Hampshire had she not been a sister in trouble. Mitt Romney would not have swept Utah and flamed out in Dixie were he not a Mormon. Mike Huckabee would not have marched triumphantly through the Bible Belt were he not a Baptist preacher and evangelical Christian. All politics is tribal.

The first campaign this writer ever covered was the New York mayoral race of 1961. Republicans stitched together the legendary ticket of Lefkowitz, Fino and Gilhooley, to touch three ethnic bases. Folks laughed. No one would have professed moral outrage had anyone suggested they were appealing to, or even pandering to, the Jewish, Italian and Irish voters of New York. People were more honest then.

Obama's agents suggest that Ferraro deliberately injected race into the campaign. But this, too, is ridiculous. Her quote came in an interview with the Daily Breeze of Torrance, Calif., not "Meet the Press."

The attack on Ferraro comes out of a conscious strategy of the Obama campaign — to seek immunity from attack by smearing any and all attackers as having racist motives. When Bill Clinton dismissed Obama's claim to have been consistently antiwar as a "fairy tale," and twinned Obama's victory in South Carolina with Jesse Jackson's, his statements were described as tinged with racism.

Early this week, Harvard Professor Orlando Patterson's sensitive nostrils sniffed out racism in Hillary's Red Phone ad, as there were no blacks in it. Patterson said it reminded him of D.W. Griffith's pro-KKK "Birth of a Nation," a 1915 film.

What Barack's allies seem to be demanding is immunity, a special exemption from political attack, because he is African-American. And those who go after him are to be brought up on charges of racism, as has Bill Clinton, Ed Rendell and now Geraldine Ferraro.

Hillary, hoping to appease Barack's constituency, is ceding the point. Will the Republican Party and the right do the same? Play by Obama rules, and you lose to Obama.

To find out more about Patrick Buchanan, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.


Comments

7 Comments | Post Comment
Pat Buchanan,

With the greatest respect....

I am a Right leaning, Bush voting, capitalist, University of Chicago graduate, Milton Friedman loving, white male, hunter.

Please take a minute… you are caught in some bad logic.

What is currently being offered (by Ferraro, Hannity, and yourself) is opinion (not a fact) of a current social trend.

Historical number of black Senators? 5

Historical number of black Presidents? 0

"If Obama was a white man, he would not be in this position. And if he was a woman [of any color] he would not be in this position. He happens to be very lucky to be who he is. And the country is caught up in the concept."

Let me re-phrase with historical accuracy.

"Inspite of Obama not being white, he is in this position. He happens to be very lucky to be in this position particularly with regards to whom he is and our nations political history. Maybe the body politic is ready to move beyond their barriers to race."

Are there voters who like Obama because he has color? Yes.

Does that make Obama's color an asset over being white? No.

History clearly shows that being white is an asset over having color.

To say that George W is the President because of his father is historically accurate.

George W Bush had a father who was a President.

To say that Hillary is a potential President because of her husband is historically accurate.

Hillary had a husband who was a President.

To say that Obama could be President because of his color (or is lucky to be who he is with regards to his color) is historically inaccurate.

To make (non-disparaging) remarks regarding race that are historically inaccurate in an effort to discount a candidate is not racist... but it is politically motivated and illogical.

To make (non-disparaging) illogical remarks regarding race in an effort to make race a central theme that discourages people from voting for a candidate is racist.

The irony is that this tactic uses a political liability (Obama's color) against him without taking responsibility... this "is" very Clinton.

Please don't help the Clintons.

I am very open to voting for McCain.

I am very closed to voting against Obama.

Respectfully Submitted

Comment: #1
Posted by: H Stein
Fri Mar 14, 2008 9:10 AM
Racist is a loaded word and over used. But it is difficult to deny Ferraro's comments, if not racist, are something approximating it. She did not list, or even imply, that most candidates have some advantage with some constituency that is based on some tribe or tribe like characteristic. She said it like it was a unique advantage Obama has over any previous candidate. And while you can interpret the words to conclude "she did not say race was the only reason Barack was succeeding", she was surely implying it is the reason he is still in the race and that this was somehow unfair. The same arguement based on sex and who her husband is applie to Hillary and applies to John McCain's war hero status. This does not make any of them less qualified or worthy, but again, in the case of Ferraro's comments this was implied. And surely Obama has many people who will niot vote for him because he is black. Until it is studied we won't know if the advantage is outwiehged by the disadvantage. But really, it is not relevant. It is what it is--50 years ago Obama wouldn't have had a chance because he is black.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Paul Hornsby
Sun Mar 16, 2008 8:52 AM
Mr. B

I am a 41 year-old African American Woman and I have never gotten anything because I was black and female. The women's movement of the sixties never included equality for black women in that movement. I an in a accelerated RN nursing class in Howard County Maryland based on my intellect and my grades reflect that intellect. I stay up most nights just to make sure I can correctly apply nursing concepts to real live patients.

If I was put into this elite class because of my skin color all I would have to do is to show up, but my standing requires more than that. It requires very hard work on my part, and that is what upset me about Geraldine Ferraro's statement. She is the one that had the notion she did not have to do anything but show up and because she felt like she did not have to work that is why that ticket went down in flames. Sh.e should have worked to obtain the vice presidency.

I can relate to Senator Obama's frustration, this race would have been over if he was not black because he has won in all areas of his candidacy except gutter politics.

Mr. B, last week on MSNBC Pat Buchannan on on the Dan Abram's show shouted to a black female journalist "shut up." Mr. B has never spoke this way to Andrea Mitchell, Rachel Maddow, Nora or any of the white female journalist on MSNBC. I believe in that moment you did not realize that you to are a bigot which keep trying to laugh and joke away, but we heart it. True or False, we as african american's hear it.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Regina
Mon Mar 17, 2008 6:51 PM
Mr. B

I am a 41 year-old African American Woman and I have never gotten anything because I was black and female. The women's movement of the sixties never included equality for black women in that movement. I an in a accelerated RN nursing class in Howard County Maryland based on my intellect and my grades reflect that intellect. I stay up most nights just to make sure I can correctly apply nursing concepts to real live patients.

If I was put into this elite class because of my skin color all I would have to do is to show up, but my standing requires more than that. It requires very hard work on my part, and that is what upset me about Geraldine Ferraro's statement. She is the one that had the notion she did not have to do anything but show up and because she felt like she did not have to work that is why that ticket went down in flames. Sh.e should have worked to obtain the vice presidency.

I can relate to Senator Obama's frustration, this race would have been over if he was not black because he has won in all areas of his candidacy except gutter politics.

Mr. B, last week on MSNBC Pat Buchannan on on the Dan Abram's show shouted to a black female journalist "shut up." Mr. B has never spoke this way to Andrea Mitchell, Rachel Maddow, Nora or any of the white female journalist on MSNBC. I believe in that moment you did not realize that you to are a bigot which keep trying to laugh and joke away, but we heart it. True or False, we as african american's hear it.
Comment: #4
Posted by: Regina
Mon Mar 17, 2008 7:02 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=khuu-RhOBDU
Must View
Comment: #5
Posted by: Regina
Mon Mar 17, 2008 9:53 PM
Pat-

Thank you for being the only one (outside of Fox News obviously/obnoxiously), to be courageous enough to be open about this issue. Everyone else is back to fawning over everything he says and I actually was eagerly awaiting to hear what you had to say. What is racist is the double standard that Obama can say whatever he wants without consequence. Racism is is sitting in those pews, acknowledging the anger of the black community, but not doing anything at the most basest levels to confront it until it becomes politically beneficial to do so. Racism is fanning the flames within his base "if" the superdelegates "overturn" the will of the people before there is even a full understanding of what that will is. He is, himself, fanning the flames of racism. If when asked about Bill's or Geraldine's comments, Obama had said the comments are not relevant to the campaign and refused to talk about them, I would see that he now had a leg to stand on. But he did not. He carried the message on, fanning those flames of anger, bitterness, racism, and all those other things that make the divide between citizens that much wider. Yes, the speech was amazing and powerful, but it does not address the underlying issue. It deflects his responsibility, especially as the platform of his campaign" to bring people together when there is something to lose (the support of his parish and the black community) and not when there is something to gain (political capital). And thank you for also being the one brave enough to stand up for Ferraro. She did not anything negative or derogatory, she simply stated a fact and thank you for reinforcing her position.

Lifelong democrat who might be forced into a republican vote if the other choice is the most divisive democratic candidate this country has seen in a long time....
Comment: #6
Posted by: Mark
Wed Mar 19, 2008 12:13 PM
GO PAT Finally someone has the intestional fortitude to speak up for the commoners. We need more voices to be objective. Hey, what happened to America?????? I don't know where I live any more. It seems to be every man for himself and we no longer have a common bond. Not everyone even speaks our language.
Comment: #7
Posted by: Marian
Sun Mar 23, 2008 3:46 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Pat Buchanan
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Judge Napolitano
Judge Andrew P. NapolitanoUpdated 16 Feb 2012
Austin Bay
Austin BayUpdated 15 Feb 2012
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 15 Feb 2012

31 Jul 2009 Tell Israel: Cool the Jets!

15 Jun 2010 Bailing Out Politicians Now?

11 Mar 2011 After the Revolution