creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Patrick Buchanan
Pat Buchanan
17 Feb 2012
The New Blacklist

My days as a political analyst at MSNBC have come to an end. After 10 enjoyable years, I am departing, after … Read More.

14 Feb 2012
On to Tehran -- or Is It Damascus?

Our War Party has been temporarily diverted from its clamor for war on Iran by the insurrection against the … Read More.

10 Feb 2012
Obama's Trampling on God's Turf Now

Yes, Virginia, there is a religious war going on. It is for the soul of America. And traditional Christianity … Read More.

Only Bigots Oppose the Mosque!

Share Comment

Only Bigots Oppose the Mosque!

"Where are the Republican leaders who will reject pandering and prejudice?" wailed The Washington Post in its most recent editorial in support of Cordoba House mosque near Ground Zero.

Like the controversy over the mosque, the Post editorial reveals the two Americas we have become, uncomprehending of and hostile to each other, even as we drift apart.

To the Post, opposition boils down to three arguments, all of them "objectionable." The first is a wrong-headed belief "that the terrorists who destroyed the World Trade Center and killed almost 3,000 people there in 2001 really did represent Islam."

The second is that, as many families of 9/11 victims associate the terrorists with Islam, to build a mosque near the scene of the massacre would be sacrilegious and wounding.

The third is cynical politics. As two-in-three Americans oppose the mosque, siding with them and savaging supporters of Cordoba House is to run unconscionably with the crowd.

None of these arguments is acceptable, says the Post, for they represent misunderstanding, prejudice or "repugnant" politics.

What the Post is saying is that opponents of the mosque are all either bigoted ignoramuses or political panderers.

Quite a statement, when a Time poll finds that 61 percent of Americans oppose the mosque and 70 percent believe that to build it near Ground Zero would defile hallowed ground.

"(T)he right response to misunderstanding and prejudice," said the Post, "is education, not appeasement."

In short, rather than yield to ignorance, bigotry and demagoguery, the Post will undertake to tutor us on how to think correctly.

This is a pure extract of liberal ideology. Few better examples of faculty-lounge obtuseness to the feelings of the people among whom they live are to be found. Yet, the editorial has a point.

For, in Webster's, there are several definitions of "prejudice."

The most pejorative one is "an irrational attitude of hostility directed against an individual, a group, a race." Another definition, however, is simply a "preconceived judgment or opinion."

It is this idea of prejudice that Edmund Burke endorsed:

"Many of our men of speculation, instead of exploding general prejudices, employ their sagacity to discover the latent wisdom which prevails in them. If they find what they seek, and they seldom fail, they think it most wise to continue the prejudice, with the reason involved, than to cast away the coat of prejudice, and to leave nothing but the naked reason."

"Naked reason," pure rationalism, permeates the Post editorial, which ignores that vast realm of sentiments, such as patriotism and love, that reside in the terrain between thought and feeling.

"The heart has reasons that the mind knows not," said Pascal.

True conservatives are people of the heart who use the weapons of the mind to defend the things of the heart.

Why would Americans be reflexively skeptical and wary of Islam?

We were born a Christian nation, an extension of Christendom. For most of us, it is part of our DNA. And for a thousand years, our ancestors fought a war of civilizations with Islam.

In the name of Islam, Muslim fanatics massacred 3,000 of us. In our media, the names commonly associated with Islam are al-Qaida, Hamas, Hezbollah, Moqtada al-Sadr, Ahmadinejad, Ayatollah Khomeini, Osama bin Laden and the Taliban.

What are sins in Christianity — adultery and homosexuality — are capital crimes in Islamic countries. From the Copts in Egypt to the Chaldeans of Iraq, Christians are persecuted and purged in the Middle East. Few remain in the old Christian towns of Jerusalem, Nazareth and Bethlehem. Christian missionaries in Islamic countries risk stonings and beheading. Muslims are attacking Christians in Nigeria, Sudan, the Caucasus, Palestine, Iraq, Pakistan, Malaysia, Indonesia and the Philippines.

Are there scores of thousands of patriotic American Muslims, hundreds of millions of decent, peace-loving Muslims around the world?

Undeniably true.

Yet one would have to be obtuse not to understand that a Western nation that opens its doors to mass migration from the Islamic world is taking a grave risk with its unity and identity.

An apprehension about that is what Burke called the "latent wisdom" of a people.

This is not an argument for war with Islam, but for recognition that "East is East and West is West" and America cannot absorb and assimilate all the creeds of mankind without ceasing to be who we are.

Prejudice is prejudgment. And if prejudgment is rooted in the history and traditions of a people, and what life has taught us, it is a shield that protects. Only a fool would reject the inherited wisdom of his kind because it fails to comport with the ideology of the moment.

"Prejudice," wrote Burke, "is of ready application in the emergency; it previously engages the mind in a steady course of wisdom and virtue, and does not leave the man hesitating in the moment of decision, skeptical, puzzled and unresolved."

Without prejudice, we are tabula rasa, blank slates, upon which any ideology may be written, including what James Burnham called the ideology of Western suicide — liberalism.

Patrick Buchanan is the author of the book "Churchill, Hitler and 'The Unnecessary War." To find out more about Patrick Buchanan, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM


Comments

6 Comments | Post Comment
I was under the impression this was supposed to be a "cultural center for learning" If this is the case why are people praying there? Also I heard one Muslim gentleman describe it as a "YMCA" type of building. If that is thecase why is it so important having it in that particular location. If the Muslims say they are tolerant and peace-loving they should understand how many Americans feel.

I think the president caused this controversy on purpose to deflect from the economy/jobs so the country would take their eye off the real issue. It appears since he has become president he tries to divide the country. Also I'm real tired of the talking heads saying how intelligent he is when he cannot even speak without someone writing it for him. When he attempts to speak without a written word all you get is aaaa,errrr . Also if he values his privacy he shouldn't be in politics.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Marian
Tue Aug 24, 2010 4:54 AM
What Americans may regard as religious freedom, the Islamic world may regard as a symbol of its penetration into the core of Christendom.The Mosque will be overlookingt the 9/11 hole in the ground with a 13 story structure . It may be seen as evidence of Islam's successful march across the globe.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Daniel Johnson
Tue Aug 24, 2010 8:58 AM
1: It is 2 New York blocks away from ground zero. That's hardly "overlooking the 9/11 hole". 2:Many cultural centers have places to pray in them. I don't know about the rest of the country, but here in SOCAL we have Bhuddist, Samoan and Korean centers that are also places of worship. 3: I'm really tired of people talking about the Muslims who want to build the center vs. Americans. The Muslims who want to build it ARE Americans. That's what legal immigration does: it makes the immigrant and their offspring citizens. Let's also try to remember that none of this was an issue last December when the building was bought, or the plans approved.
One last thing. Marian: Are you seriously saying that Obama decided to influence the building of a conflict laden Mosque/Cultural center in downtown Manhattan (which would have taken years of prep work) so that he could distract us from the economy? That would be the most amazing foresight and planning I've ever heard of! If he pulled that off he must be one of the most brilliant planners of our age.
Comment: #3
Posted by: wyn667
Tue Aug 24, 2010 12:30 PM
Mr. Buchanan makes the interesting point that the sentiments of the majority are a better guide to what should be done than our principles and laws. I must admit I represent a hopeless case of faculty-lounge obstuseness and that is why I can't help pointing out that the sufi sect of Islam to which the sponsor of the mosque, imam Feisal Abdul Rauf, belongs is regarded as heretical by sunnis. One of their mosques in Pakistan was blown up a few days ago, with dozens of worshippers killed. Thus they have more in common with the 9-11 victims than with the perpetrators.
Comment: #4
Posted by: Peter Ungar
Tue Aug 24, 2010 6:26 PM
Sometimes Mr. Buchanan gets it right, as in his opposition to the war in Iraq. Sometimes he gets it dead wrong, as in his interpretation of coverting a building into an Islamic Community Center into a re-run of the Crusades. We were attacked by Al Quaeda on 9/11, not by the whole Muslim world Mr. Buchanan. If people think a "Mosque" near ground zero would "defile hallowed ground", than you might ask what is being built right atop this "hallowed ground." Why, an edifice to (trumpets please) commerce! Apparently, Mr. Buchanan, the worship of Mammon is an appropriate use for the actual ground zero site. I never thought, when Calvin Coolidge said that "the business of America is business" that he was espousing a religious doctine. If this truly is "hallowed ground" like Gettysburg, then it should have been declared a National Monument regardless of the commercial value of the land. Instead, we are getting an office tower as a fitting memorial to the dead. Let's forget this manufactured controversy about this "Mosque" and ask what we are really building here.
Comment: #5
Posted by: Mark Young
Wed Aug 25, 2010 8:40 PM
Re: Mark Young I agree totally with Mr Young's comments and have expressed my viewpoints with friends and family.
Pat Buchanan cannot stop fighting old wars and his hard right idealogy is the kind of hate filled nonsense that keeps this country bogged down in ancient muck. Sarah Palin and her like also are immersed in this kind of old time cowboy
politics that made Reagan and Bush two of our worst Presidents...to say nothing of Nixon. None of these men gave our country any progressive accomplishments that we can be proud of. Reagan took credit for the end of the cold war, which as everyone knows was ending anyway due to Russia's economical bankruptcy. JFK predicted that it would happen if we just waited long enough. Why can't we wake up and see that these kinds of people just drag our nation down, down, down...we need to let go of the rhetoric of the dinosaur.
Comment: #6
Posted by: gloria
Wed Aug 25, 2010 11:18 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Pat Buchanan
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 27 Feb 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 20 Feb 2012
Mark Levy
Mark LevyUpdated 18 Feb 2012

3 Aug 2010 GOP Blank Check for War?

14 Aug 2009 Unwinnable War?

30 Mar 2007 The Mid-Life Crisis of the EU