Yes, Virginia, there is a religious war going on. It is for the soul of America. And traditional Christianity is besieged.
In a January visit to the Vatican, American bishops were warned by Benedict XVI that "radical secularism" posed "grave threats" to their Catholic faith. Your religious freedom is being circumscribed, said the pope. The U.S. government may seek to force you to collaborate in what are "intrinsically evil practices."
No sooner had the bishops returned home than President Obama instructed them that, under Obamacare, all Catholic schools, hospitals, orphanages, nursing homes and homeless shelters must provide the "morning after" pill, contraceptives and sterilizations for all employees, Catholic and non-Catholic alike.
The Church was given 18 months to comply.
Should Obama's order stand, the Church will be forced by the state to adopt practices that it has always taught are immoral and to engage in acts it believes are intrinsically evil.
Welcome to Obama's America.
Last week, the Komen Foundation, which funds breast cancer research, sought to extricate itself from the country's culture wars by severing ties to America's No. 1 abortion provider, Planned Parenthood.
As professor Robert George writes, in 2010, Planned Parenthood sold 300,000 abortions at $500 each, earning $164 million. Nine of 10 pregnant women who come into its clinics are sold an abortion.
Moreover, the organization is "under congressional and criminal investigation ... for allegations including failure to report criminal child sex abuse, misuse of health care and family planning funds, and failure to comply with parental involvement laws regarding abortions."
In the 1950s, such an institution would be regarded as organized crime and its officers and employees would be up on felony charges or sitting in a penitentiary. We live today in a different America.
Thus, the media-political-cultural elite came down on Komen with both feet, berating the foundation for abandoning women suffering from breast cancer, until Komen caved and restored the $650,000 it contributes annually to Planned Parenthood, though that sum is not one-tenth of one percent of PP's annual budget.
The Komen officer who advised the foundation to sever ties was cashiered on Feb. 7.
Also on Tuesday, a three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals overturned, two to one, the democratic decision of a majority of Californians who voted in 2008 to outlaw homosexual marriage.
The people of California, said the Jimmy Carter judicial appointee and the Bill Clinton appointee, violated the 14th Amendment, which mandates the equal protection of the law.
That the Congress that took office in 1865, the year Richmond fell, meant to elevate homosexual unions to the same moral plane as matrimony when it enacted the 14th Amendment is an absolute absurdity.
What has happened to America in half a century seems, to many raised in that other America, like something out of Orwell.
Can it be that Californians must now wait on the U.S.
Supreme Court — make that Justice Anthony Kennedy, the swing vote — to tell them whether they can or cannot write their own marriage laws?
How did it come to be that we Americans must all wait for nine judges on the Supreme Court to tell us whether homosexual marriage is or is not a constitutional right?
Where did justices get the power to decide whether laws enacted by the people or their elected representatives will be allowed to stand in this republic? Where did these nine justices get the right to be sole and final arbiters of what the Constitution and the laws say and do not say?
As law professor and author William Quirk muses, in introducing the new book "Judicial Monarchs" by William Watkins, Jr.:
"'Notes of the (Constitutional) Convention do not record Ben Franklin standing up and saying: 'I've got a good idea. Let's find nine really bright people and turn over most of our important decisions to them.' Would the Convention authorize an institution that defines its own powers?"
Not the convention our Founding Fathers attended.
Yet since the Warren Court came into being six decades ago, the Supreme Court has usurped that power — to remake America. And the American people have meekly submitted to its tyrannical rule.
The justices used the Ninth Amendment to declare homosexuality and abortion constitutional rights, though both were crimes when the Bill of Rights was adopted. They used the First Amendment to purge Christianity from our public schools and public life and reduce our cradle faith to the same level as Santeria and Scientology.
Now the radical secularists in Obama's entourage are so puffed up with success, so confident the future belongs to them, they have crossed the line between church and state to impose their values directly on Christian institutions.
This time they have overplayed their hand. Traditionalist Christians and their allies have been given a glorious opening to inflict a stinging defeat and humiliation on these arrogant intruders on God's turf.
On this one, Obama ought to be forced into a public retreat.
Patrick J. Buchanan is the author of "Suicide of a Superpower: Will America Survive to 2025?" To find out more about Patrick Buchanan and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.
COPYRIGHT 2012 CREATORS.COM

|
 |
Comments
|
12 Comments | Post Comment
|
|
Buchanan, where do you get the right to tell someone else who and how to love? Where does anyone get the right, not only to tell others who and how to love, but also to tell them that they don't have the same rights in their committed relationship as anyone else?
This is the problem with Christians, Muslims, and others, who feel they have a lock on God and some sort of special line to heaven that makes their beliefs more legitimate than others. There is not one religion on this planet that fails to stand up to Christianity in terms of legitimacy, ethics, and morality as legitimate approach to knowing God, and given the track record over the centuries of hypocrisy and bloodshed that has occurred in the name of Christianity, which now sadly is being rivaled by the same in the name of Islam, Christians have no business telling anybody what to think about God or anything else for that matter.
God's will is for people to decide for themselves, without having to suffer instruction from those who think they know best.
The U.S. Constitution, the California Constitution, and the mob-rule initiative process are worse than worthless if they permit a dirty assault on the rights of peaceful, law-abiding, ethical, and moral people like Proposition 8. None of us need any of those robed idiots in the courts to opine on that one way or the other. It's in our DNA as human beings.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Masako
Thu Feb 9, 2012 7:17 PM
|
|
|
|
The problem with any extremeist group, such as Jihad or fundamentalist Christians is that they want to decide for everyone else that WE have to be one of the extremist nut bars as well. If you don't want abortion, birth control or condoms, DON'T PARTAKE OF IT, but you don't get to tell me what to do. Obamacare is not telling anyone what to do, it is available if you want it, that's all, use it or don't use it. you don't want it but have to pay for it, great, I don't want viagra covered, but I have to pay for it..... The Catholic church, who has no right to teach morality in light its vast history of immoral behavior, ie., child abuse cover ups and history of massacres, does not have a moral lock on anything. A fact, 90% of Catholic woman use birth control. The church is so outdated it is trolling in third world countries for new members, educated sophisticated countries have dumped the church. I personally don't think viagra should be covered by any insurance company, the fact that people like Pat want their viagra but don't want to cover birth control is the real outrage. Typical GOP, this is their mantra, SCREW YOU, I'VE GOT MINE
Comment: #2
Posted by: Bloom Hilda
Thu Feb 9, 2012 8:00 PM
|
|
|
|
Uh, the Bush administration had the exact same policy on birth control, religious organizations, etc., and the Catholic Church put up with it then. The policy has also survived several court challenges. No, the Church and Pat are just grandstanding in the hopes that Santorum or Gingrich might benefit (more likely one of them ending up being a VP choice). Pure hypocrisy, but what else could we expect at this point?
Comment: #3
Posted by: Ms. Rowena
Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:59 AM
|
|
|
|
If the Catholic Church can have a dispensation from laws which apply to all Americans, then Mormons have the religious right to polygamy.
Comment: #4
Posted by: demecra zydeem
Fri Feb 10, 2012 8:42 AM
|
|
|
|
The Catholic Church is fundamentaly a bunch of controlling political crooks as with all organized religion. I was raised a Catholic and have developed a contempt for all organized religions (cults). Now this is just me...I believe in God, the son of God and seek comfort praying to the Blessed Virgin Mary. This situation is political. What possible reason would it be perfectly acceptable to cover Viagra for every MAN (including priest & clergy) and leave WOMEN at their mercy without birth control. Yeah, I think I get it. Obama got it right... he is not the control freak.
Comment: #5
Posted by: M. Turner
Fri Feb 10, 2012 11:56 AM
|
|
|
|
All 4 replies dodge the essential point: Where in the Constirution does it give the President the right to tell anyone what they must buy or sell? Thind or ace? We are a nation of laws, not diktats from on high. You are selfish blockheads focused on your "Wepwoductive Wights", which NO ONE is taking away from you, but you are perfectly willing to disenfranchise voters and undermine the Constitution to GET YOUR STINKING WAY. Masako accuses religious people of thinking they have a lock on God, her solution is to put a lock on God and throw the key away. PSSST, the country was founded on freedom of religion, not freedom from religion, and your irreligiousity is stinking of sanctimony itself. Please regard and recognize this fact, yours is a religion by another name. Bloom whatever thinks and acts as if people are TELLING HER WHAT TO DO, like the adolescent she never grew out of. Sure, but it is Okay for Obama to tell Catholics what to do, right? You are the worst kind of hypocrite, smarmy and self serving. Roweena doesn't know what she;s talking about, she defaults to Libera Lines of Comfort - "Well, Bush did it!". Nah, he didn't make any such order, you are a liar. Finally, demecra weighs in with another half-wit truth, there is no such law, you chucklehead. The President is not granted the power to just make up laws. Please show me the article that says Obama can just make laws up on his Caesarian whim. There is no law to be brokien, just a decree by a man delusional with power. It is a country for all of us, not just whiners and complainers and people more interested in sophistry than reality. Look past yourselves and your myriad of grievances against anybody who disagrees with you. Just one little inch past your won nose. Do not allow one man, or three man panels, to dictate and rule over all of us. That is surely what is happening, and you may be comforted now because it works with all that is holy to you, but your day will come too, and the government will coerce you to bend to its will. That day will come.
Comment: #6
Posted by: Tom
Fri Feb 10, 2012 12:12 PM
|
|
|
|
Oh, and turner has "contempt" for all organized religion. The tone is full of hate, and of course this blinds one to the fact that medicine and doctors generally cure things that are wrong, not working, like viagra does when a man is, uh, not working. They fix things, you get it? Why would you complain about and demand coverage for something that is working? You aren't going to give me that old saw about abridging your rights because you don't want to be thought of as a helpless and silly little creature who can't control her urges and can't keep enough money in her account to pay for BC, do you? So stand up an pay for it, or have your man pay for it, it might be worth it to him.
Comment: #7
Posted by: Tom
Fri Feb 10, 2012 12:25 PM
|
|
|
|
Broom whatever - go read Malkin and learn about the history of your precious abortion rights. People from that side of the track have less right than the Catholic Church to "teach morality" as you put it. Tell us how you came to agree with Margaret Sanger's "Negro Project", Come on, I want to hear you "teach morality" to us. Do so and I just might consider buying your BC for you.
Comment: #8
Posted by: Tom
Fri Feb 10, 2012 1:54 PM
|
|
|
|
Dear Tom. What you don't get is that what other people do in their private lives is NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS. There is no contempt or hate in any of these messages. All we are saying is leave us alone, mind your own business. Stop trying to make laws that tell us how to live our lives.
Comment: #9
Posted by: Masako
Sat Feb 11, 2012 7:23 PM
|
|
|
|
Tom...this one's for you!!
Who is ultimately paying for employer-sponsored health insurance? If an employer receives taxpayer-provided money to provide services -- as educational institutions do when they accept Pell grants or federally guaranteed student loans, and as hospitals do when they receive Medicare and Medicaid payments -- should that employer still be allowed to exempt its employees from provisions of federal health care law?
When a Catholic organization hires employees from the general public, offers services to the general public, and accepts government money for those services, it should not be allowed to impose its theological conditions on its employees' health care choices by refusing to cover contraception. That is not religious freedom; that is religious imperialism and comes dangerously close to the "establishment of religion" that is prohibited by the Constitution."
Comment: #10
Posted by: demecra zydeem
Sat Feb 11, 2012 7:48 PM
|
|
|
|
Re: Masako
You claim "God's will is for people to decide for themselves, without having to suffer instruction from those who think they know best"
If you are going to sight what God wants, you have to put it in the overall context of what God REALLY wants.
He does not want us to sin.
A man having sexual intercourse with another man is sinful according to God.
Leviticus 20:13 'If a man lies with a man as one lies with a woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They must be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads.
This is not my opinion, this is God's word. You can't have it both ways. Either live by God's word or suffer the consequences. Again, not my opinion. It's God's law.
People who want to live on their own terms as most of us do, turn and twist His words (and leave out important facts) or ignore them completely to justify our behavior. I, nor you or our so called leaders know what's best. We are not qualified to dictate what is best. We only have God's word to help guide us as a people as to how to live according to His will.
This fact is God's word is being arrogantly outlawed in our society today because the secularists refuse to bow to a greater God than themselves. In the process we've allowed our courts to remove the 10 commandments from schools, outlawed public prayer and are now forcing birth control on those who believe it's immoral.
Has life in this country improved since these momentous turning points? I think not. You can go back to these times and see the beginning of America's backslide and fall from grace. Coincidence? I don't think so.
May God have mercy on our arrogance and stupidity and I publicly pray for grace on those who still don't see - until they can, if ever.
Comment: #11
Posted by: TheHammer
Fri Feb 17, 2012 9:15 AM
|
|
|
|
Re: Masako, Your position that people decide for themselves God's will is the reason for "The Fall" in the Garden of Eden. When every man does what is right in his own eyes apart from the God revealed in Holy Scripture, our destination is dead ends with terrible eternal consequences.
Comment: #12
Posted by: Rodney
Sat Feb 18, 2012 7:24 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|