creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Patrick Buchanan
Pat Buchanan
14 Feb 2012
On to Tehran -- or Is It Damascus?

Our War Party has been temporarily diverted from its clamor for war on Iran by the insurrection against the … Read More.

10 Feb 2012
Obama's Trampling on God's Turf Now

Yes, Virginia, there is a religious war going on. It is for the soul of America. And traditional Christianity … Read More.

7 Feb 2012
Who Wants War With Iran?

Appearing alongside CIA Director David Petraeus before the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence last week, … Read More.

Obama Avoids the Crocodile

Share Comment

By reversing himself and refusing to release graphic photos of abused prisoners of war, Barack Obama has stunned liberals.

They feel betrayed and abandoned by a president they put into office. On war and torture, at least, they thought Barack was one of them. He is not. Barack is not into ideology. He is into Barack.

As he showed in 2008, when he threw his white grandmother under the bus and spared his beloved black pastor, the Rev. Wright, then threw Wright under the bus when his toxicity level rose too high, Barack has all the sentimentality of Michael Corleone when it comes to the family business.

And what Obama is saying with his refusal to release the photos is what he has been signaling for weeks now: I am not going to fight the liberals' war — on Dick Cheney's turf. The rewards are nonexistent, and the risks too great.

Thus, when Gens. Petraeus, Odierno and McKiernan grumbled, Obama tossed a blanket over the photos. Barack Obama is not taking on CENTCOM or West Point for a bunch of congressional progressives.

Thus, after he had opened the door to prosecution of the Bush lawyers who wrote the "torture memos," and resistance formed up, Obama backed down.

He said he did not want a special prosecutor. He did not want a 9-11 commission to delve into the criminality of what was done. He wants to put all that behind us and move forward.

Liberal moral outrage notwithstanding, Barack Obama is not going to fight the liberals' war on the liberals' turf. And history confirms the wisdom of his instincts. For it was by pursuing liberal theology that Democrats lost the nation they once owned.

It was ideology that led FDR and New Deal liberals to trust in "Uncle Joe" Stalin, to claim Mao's men were "agrarian reformers," and to defend Alger Hiss and deny the government was shot through with security risks and Soviet spies that dealt all those cards to Tailgunner Joe and turned the nation over to Ike and Dick in 1952.

It was the liberals who belatedly discovered that the war JFK and LBJ had marched us into in Southeast Asia was a "dirty and immoral" war and we were defending a "corrupt and dictatorial regime," which gave Richard Nixon his New Majority and 49-state landslide in 1972.

It was the Church Committee and Pike Commission ripping up the FBI and CIA, and Jimmy Carter's braying, "We have gotten over our inordinate fear of communism," and kissing Leonid Brezhnev — followed by the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan — that convinced Americans they had to roll the dice with the cowboy.

And while Ronald Reagan was liberating Grenada and helping the Contras overthrow the communist Sandinistas, liberal Democrats were penning "Dear Commandante" mash notes to Daniel Ortega.

In short, liberals are incorrigible and their disease incurable.

Obama senses this, and is not about to let them conscript his presidency into an ideological crusade, all of which invariably end, like the Children's Crusade of Peter the Hermit, with everybody dead or in captivity.

Which brings us to The Crocodile.

Whatever one may think of Dick Cheney, about him it must be said: He is not ashamed of his record.

He does not apologize for it. He is willing to go out and defend it in the arena.

He believes, that, after 9-11, he, as a custodian of the national security, had a duty to go the limit to get information from terrorists to prevent another or worse atrocity.

He admits to having approved the authorization of "enhanced interrogation techniques," including waterboarding. He believes they yielded indispensable information about our enemies that helped to prevent another attack for seven and a half years. He does not believe that they were illegal, or constituted torture.

He is a true believer, full of conviction and certitude, whose unstated retort to those demanding he be prosecuted for war crimes is the one he gave the distinguished senator from Vermont, Mr. Leahy.

And Cheney is winning.

Why? Because other than the hard left, which demands commissions, prosecutions, indictments, convictions and imprisonments, on the other side it is all loud noise and moral mush.

He is winning because he has the courage of his convictions, while his enemies come up short in both departments.

There is another reason Obama does not want this fight.

There is a high probability, if not a near certainty, that, one day, al-Qaida is going to conduct some spectacular attack on this country or its allies, and Americans will say, "This didn't happen when people like Cheney were running the show."

Obama has been dealt a tough hand, and he knows it.

Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan could all go horribly wrong. And, should that happen, the boy from Hyde Park and Harvard Law wants to be standing beside the CIA, not the ACLU.

That, too, is why Obama wants no part of this fight with Cheney.

Patrick Buchanan is the author of the new book "Churchill, Hitler and 'The Unnecessary War." To find out more about Patrick Buchanan, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2009 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.


Comments

5 Comments | Post Comment
"It was ideology that led FDR and New Deal liberals to ... defend Alger Hiss and deny the government was shot through with security risks and Soviet spies..."
Interesting take. Another possibility is that the few who had access to the security information were just covering their you-know-whats, while the majority actually believed that Hiss and the rest were innocent.
For more on this, see: http://www.conservapedia.com/Alger_Hiss
Comment: #1
Posted by: Ignatz Zablonsky
Fri May 15, 2009 4:25 AM
I sometimes wonder if Pat is an authentic Catholic..The way he conducts witch hunts as a lackey for the Republican Party. Also, I wonder how he explains the fact that Catholucs haven't taken care of the born (re their Pastors molesting small boys in their churches) The church hasn't taken care of the born as well as it has taken care of the unborn......!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Comment: #2
Posted by: Frances Sue Moore
Fri May 15, 2009 11:02 AM
Sir;...Let Mr. Obama stun the liberals.. That only means he is an idiot..He needs the liberal vote... The reactionaries are not ever going to vote for him, so if I don't vote for him he has lost a sure thing for a pipe dream...He wants to work with conservatives...He ought to spend every moment of every day trying so shore up his base, and in putting all the republican dirt up the noses of republican voters... Show them...Lay those crimes at their feet, and and make them deny they occured... In showing that lack of courage he has not gained a single republican vote... He has taken bad advice, and he has taken bad advice on a number of issues...What good is the power of a king with corrupt advice, or the advice of idiots??? He is showing his nature... Just as he can pass for black or white, he is trying now to pass for conservative with conservatives... They will not buy it... No matter how his says it; peace and cooperation and understanding do not sound like shibboleth....Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #3
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Fri May 15, 2009 9:28 PM
Re: Frances Sue Moore;...Ma'am, try to remember that at least one of those Catholic men likes women...I am certain that if the church let priests marry, their wives could keep the priests off the children...The one advantage to no wives was that it made the Church a meritocracy... While all the rest of society was, and still is ruining itself trying to replace the need for merit with hereditary wealth and power, the Catholic Church survived on ability... It is too bad the able were not more willing to wait for their eternal reward...They only need more faith and less authority...Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #4
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Fri May 15, 2009 9:36 PM
"I can no more disown him, than I can disown my white grandmother, a woman who helped raise me. A woman who sacrificed again and again for me. A woman who loves me as much as she loves anything in this world. But a woman who once confessed her fear of black men who pass her on the street, and who, on more than one occasion, has uttered racial or ethnic stereotypes that made me cringe. These people are part of me."
If you think that's throwing her under the bus, Buchanan, you've lost every last little trace of journalistic desire to respect the truth, if indeed you ever had any. Your little empathy-deprived brain wouldn't know the first thing about growing up in a multi-racial family.
Comment: #5
Posted by: Masako
Sun May 17, 2009 8:30 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Pat Buchanan
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Judge Napolitano
Judge Andrew P. NapolitanoUpdated 16 Feb 2012
Austin Bay
Austin BayUpdated 15 Feb 2012
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 15 Feb 2012

22 Jan 2008 Ghettoizing Barack

31 May 2011 What Must We Defend?

12 Jan 2007 Still One More Card to Play