opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Patrick Buchanan
Pat Buchanan
5 Feb 2016
The Remainderman

Donald Trump won more votes in the Iowa caucuses than any Republican candidate in history. Impressive, except … Read More.

2 Feb 2016
Is a New Era Upon Us?

Whoever wins the nominations, the most successful campaigns of 2016 provide us with a clear picture of where … Read More.

29 Jan 2016
The Civil War of the Right

The conservative movement is starting to look a lot like Syria. Baited, taunted, mocked by Fox News, Donald … Read More.

Obama and the Great Game


The day before Richard Holbrooke arrived in Kabul, eight suicide bombers and gunmen attacked the Justice and Education ministries, killing 26 and wounding 57.

Kabul was paralyzed, as the Taliban displayed an ability to wreak havoc within a hundred yards of the presidential palace.

The assault came as President Obama is both conducting a strategic review and deciding how many additional U.S. troops to send.

Earlier, there was talk of 30,000, bringing the U.S. total to 63,000. Now, there are reports Obama may commit no more than the three brigades promised in 2008, and only one brigade now.

Clearly, the United States is checking its hole card. Can we draw to a winning hand? Or is this hand an inevitable loser — and we must cut our losses and cede the pot? No longer, anywhere, is there talk of "victory."

Nor is the diplomatic news good.

Last week, Kyrgyzstan gave us six months to vacate Manas, the air base used to resupply U.S. forces. A week before, guerrillas blew up a bridge in the Khyber, cutting the 1,000-mile supply line from Karachi to Kabul. Before that, guerrillas bombed U.S. truck parks in Pakistan.

While in Pakistan, Holbrooke was told by all to whom he spoke that, while U.S. Predator strikes may be killing Taliban and al-Qaida, the deaths among tribal peoples are turning Pakistan against us.

What would winning Afghanistan for democracy profit us, if the price were losing a nuclear-armed Pakistan to Islamism?

The expulsion from Manas, after Kyrgyzstan received a reported $2 billion in aid from Moscow, raises a question.

Is Russia restarting "The Great Game" she played against Victoria's Empire in Central Asia, which ended in 1907 with a British-Russian entente, dividing Iran into spheres of influence, with both sides agreeing to keep hands off Afghanistan?

As Russia has as great an interest in preventing an Islamist Kabul, and has assisted NATO's resupply of its forces, why would Moscow seek to expel us from a base vital to the war effort?

Does Russia simply seek to be recognized by the United States as the hegemon of Central Asia, the sole great power that decides who can and who cannot use former Soviet bases?

For if Manas is closed and the Karachi-Khyber-Kabul supply line is compromised or cut, Obama would seem to have but three options.

First would be to go back, hat-in-hand, to Islam Karimov, the Uzbek ruler charged with grave human rights violations, and ask him to reopen the Karshi-Khanabad (K2) air base, from which we were expelled in 2005.

And what would be Karimov's asking price?

Second is the Russia option. If Moscow now holds the whip hand in the old Soviet republics, what is Moscow's price to let us remain in Manas or use other Soviet bases over which it wields veto power?

The answer is obvious. Neither Georgia nor Ukraine is to be brought into NATO. The independence of Abkhazia and South Ossetia, won in the August war with Georgia, is not to be challenged. The U.S anti-missile missiles planned for Poland are not to be deployed.

In turn, Russia will cancel any missile deployment in Kaliningrad, recommits to the terms of all conventional forces agreements in Europe and assist in the effort in Afghanistan. Russia rejoins the West, and the West stays off Russia's front porch.

Be not surprised if the Russians come trolling before an overextended American empire an end to the Great Game in Central Asia like the one the ministers of Nicholas II offered the ministers of Edward VII.

And the third option? It is Iran.

Before 9-11, Iran was more hostile to the anti-Shia Taliban than we, and it has no desire to see them return. Indeed, Tehran was a supporter of the U.S. wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, as both were ruled by mortal enemies.

The long way for U.S. and NATO war materiel to reach Kabul via Iran would be through a Turkey-Kurdistan-Iran supply line. The shorter would be from Iranian ports straight into Afghanistan.

Price of an entente? An end to the 30-year U.S.-Iranian cold war and a strategic bargain whereby Iran is allowed to develop peaceful nuclear power, under supervision, the United States lifts its embargo, and regime change is left to the Iranian people.

President Ahmadinejad, no fool, and facing an uncertain election this year, is already signaling interest in negotiations with Obama.

A complication. How would "Bibi" Netanyahu and Avigdor Lieberman regard a U.S.-Iran rapprochement — to prevent a Taliban triumph in Kabul?

Yet, if the Taliban's enemies in Russia, Iran, Pakistan and Central Asia will not assist us, this war cannot end well. And if they will not help, Obama should cut America's losses, come home and let their neighbors deal with a triumphant Taliban.

Patrick Buchanan is the author of the new book "Churchill, Hitler and 'The Unnecessary War." To find out more about Patrick Buchanan, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at



3 Comments | Post Comment
Russia doesn't want our bases on their border any more than we want theirs on ours. If we want a base in the Mid-East to fight all our wars over there it should be in Israel. We're paying them several billion dollars a year, running interference for them at the UN, and doing their bidding in Congress. I'm not sure if we're their client state, or they, ours. But, we're in be with them in every way possible. So build a base there and stay out of Russia's hair.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Elwood Anderson
Fri Feb 13, 2009 12:37 AM
Obviously all that is going on with respect to our country will pale in comparison if Bibi N gets
elected. I fear he will make Sharon look like a wimp.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Marian
Fri Feb 13, 2009 5:01 AM
Sir;...Central Asia is a loser for us.... But try to tell people going in what a loser Afghanistan was going to be and they would laugh in your face... The place is easy to take, and impossible to hold; and nations more concerned with the loss of face than in demonstrating their intelligence always try to stay... When all the pieces come together it will be Russia that has the Queen, and holds the board... Sure, we can shed more blood for nothing... We can make the problem larger, but draw the solution no nearer.... What Britain had to concede in the great game was freedom for Russia to feed on the dieing Othman Empire.... Britain could not defend turkey, and Iran, and India, her Jewel... Both Russia and Britain whittled away at the Chinese Empire, but I would not count on that happening much today.. In any event, death and dollars are the inevitable price of empire... We have to decide what we are going to pay, for what possible gain... To me, there is no gain... We cannot in our wildest nightmares count a worn out and embittered military as a gain...We cannot count on a united and vengeful Pakistan as a gain.... We cannot count the billions spent so far for no gain as a gain... The object of war in not stalemate.... Our war with Islam has no other object...The object should always have been to leave... No one can fight an enemy that is not there...No one can win a defensive war with an offensive army...No one can win without interior lines... A guerilla war is difficult enough, but one where they have the choice of battle fields, and the battle field of choice means certain defeat for us... We should have fought it differently, and we should still get out... We should have considered Lincoln's advice to Seward to have one war at a time....I suppose, if you are going to the ends of the earth to buy at great price a victory or no worth, you might as well buy two...But it was always stupid...And it is still stupid to try to stay... Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #3
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Fri Feb 13, 2009 5:03 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right: comments policy
Pat Buchanan
Feb. `16
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 1 2 3 4 5
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Authorís Podcast
Star ParkerUpdated 10 Feb 2016
Walter Williams
Walter E. WilliamsUpdated 10 Feb 2016
John Stossel
John StosselUpdated 10 Feb 2016

19 Jun 2009 Tiananmen Moments

11 Oct 2012 Stay out of the Syrian Maelstrom

28 Aug 2015 Dis-Integrating America