opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Patrick Buchanan
Pat Buchanan
5 Feb 2016
The Remainderman

Donald Trump won more votes in the Iowa caucuses than any Republican candidate in history. Impressive, except … Read More.

2 Feb 2016
Is a New Era Upon Us?

Whoever wins the nominations, the most successful campaigns of 2016 provide us with a clear picture of where … Read More.

29 Jan 2016
The Civil War of the Right

The conservative movement is starting to look a lot like Syria. Baited, taunted, mocked by Fox News, Donald … Read More.

Nixon and Obama -- Soul Brothers?


Four decades ago, Lamar Alexander worked in Richard Nixon's White House. Sen. Alexander today says Barack Obama's White House reminds him of that place, that time, that mindset and those people.

Intending no disrespect to my old colleague, these days are not at all like those days, and this president and White House are nothing like the White House in which this writer worked from Inauguration Day 1969 to August 1974, when Marine One lifted off the lawn.

Richard Nixon had been elected in the most turbulent year since the Civil War.

Between New Hampshire and November, there was the Tet Offensive, LBJ's announcement he would not run again, the murder of Martin Luther King Jr. in Memphis, race riots in 100 cities and Washington, D.C., the takeover of Columbia University by radicals, the assassination of Robert Kennedy, a Democratic convention in Chicago marked by rancor inside the hall and police-radical confrontations outside, and a campaign in which Hubert Humphrey was shouted down at rallies until he agreed to a bombing halt in Vietnam.

No, these times are not those times.

Nixon took the oath as a minority president, 43 percent, in a hostile city, with both houses of Congress against him and a national press corps that had loathed him since he exposed the establishment golden boy Alger Hiss as a Soviet spy, 20 years before.

Obama took the oath with close to a filibuster-proof Senate, a near 80-seat majority in the House, the media at his feet, not his throat, and a city in adulation that had voted 93 to 7 for Barack Hussein Obama.

Not even JFK entered office with more goodwill.

While Obama inherited an economic situation far worse than did Nixon, Nixon inherited a war far more divisive and bloody than Iraq and Afghanistan combined, with 535,000 troops in Vietnam or on the way, and 200 soldiers coming home every week in caskets and body bags.

By October 1969, Nixon had ordered 100,000 troops home from Vietnam, proposed a Family Assistance Plan, enunciated a new Nixon Doctrine, welcomed the Apollo 11 astronauts home from the moon and become the first President to visit a communist country, Romania.

Obama has held a beer summit and won a Nobel Peace Prize.

In both October and November of 1969, 500,000 demonstrators marched on Washington to — in the words of David Broder — "break Richard Nixon" as they had broken Lyndon Johnson.

Wrote Broder, "The likelihood is great that they will succeed again."

"Instead of making pronouncements about not being the first U.S.

president to lose a war," admonished Time, "Nixon would perform a better service by preparing the country for the trauma of distasteful reversal" — i.e, a U.S. defeat.

Nixon answered the demonstrators and their media auxiliaries with a Nov. 3. speech calling on "the Great Silent Majority" to stand with him and against those out to destroy his policy and presidency.

When the three networks — primary sources of news for two-thirds of the nation then — trashed his speech, Nixon authorized a counterattack by Vice President Agnew, which caused an avalanche of telegrams to pour into ABC, CBS and NBC denouncing them, in solidarity with the administration.

By December, it was not Nixon who was broken. Antiwar activists never mustered those numbers again, and the media had been exposed as out of touch with Middle America.

That month, Nixon rose to near 70 percent approval, and Agnew was the third most admired man in America, after Nixon and Billy Graham.

Nixon and Agnew had not wanted the fight, they had not started the fight, but they had not backed down — and they had won the fight.

What were they supposed to do, Lamar? And when has Obama encountered anything like that?

Lamar left the White House in mid-1970 and decries Agnew's depiction of Albert Gore Sr., of his home state of Tennessee, as "the Southern regional chairman of the Eastern Liberal Establishment."

But was that not true? Gore was defeated in 1970 because he had lost touch with Tennessee. And Lamar's friend Bill Brook won.

They may have called us all paranoid, but as Henry Kissinger once mordantly observed, "Sometimes, even paranoids have real enemies."

As for an "enemies list," the only mistake was writing it down.

Does Lamar not think Nixon had enemies out to destroy him?

Does he not believe there was rejoicing in Washington when Nixon fell, or smug satisfaction when Vietnam, Cambodia and Laos were lost — on the faces of those who persuaded themselves that America could not succeed in Vietnam because they had failed?

No one denies Nixon made mistakes. Even he conceded, "I gave them a sword, and they ran it through me."

But those enemies were not a figment of his or our imagination. The Nixon-haters were real, and they were legion.

In 1969-1970, Nixon had a choice: capitulate or fight.

Compared with what he went through, Obama had a cakewalk.

Patrick Buchanan is the author of the book "Churchill, Hitler and 'The Unnecessary War." To find out more about Patrick Buchanan, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at



2 Comments | Post Comment
I have stated before I thought the annointed one was an empty suit. I was wrong. He is a very cold calculating arrogant angry person. He knows exactly what he is doing and where he intends to take this country. Is it 2012 yet?
Comment: #1
Posted by: Marian
Sat Oct 24, 2009 2:57 AM
Re: Marian;...You are a demonstration of displacement... All your anger is justified if the "Annointed one" is the true angry one... From my persective, he is not nearly angry enough... He may look black to the black people, but he does not have the anger of people snatched from their native land, harnassed to a plow, often worked to death, and who, even after the legal fiction of emancipation, were denied civil rights and equality... In spite of Mr. B's usual nonsense, the good will of which he speaks is vapor...There was good will and hope among the liberals, but among republican reactionaries the day will never dawn when they will accept a black man as president, and it is likely that that bunch will never accept a democrat as president...I think they are in the minority, but their consent to the government is essential to its working as it should, or could... I would only hope that the democrats would also give up on the failed process of majority rule, and party rule and obstruct with their whole being the government by republicans... We cannot expect that the world will not take advantage of time while we stand at loggerheads... Yet; why should anyone have peace without their also having justice???If the democrats cannot get what they want from republican government, and the republicans cannot get what they want from democratic government why should we not go to zero, and start over??? At some point, all people have consider the difficulty of fixing the thing as opposed to beginning again...The problem is that no one can have the future but at the price of the past...If people cannot give up one they cannot have the other, but no one can live without a future, and many have died trying to hold vainly onto a failed past...The success of Mr. Nixon was built upon a divided society... He never united us, but drove the wedge of enmity even deeper into our national soul...It is not a wonder that he opened China... No one but a republican could open China because any democrat attempting to do so would have been labled a commie...In just such fashion all foreign affairs under the democrats have been manipulated...Nixon had a secret plan for victory in Vietnam, and after all, he settled for nearly the same deal the United States already had under the democrats... All that criminal did was waste the lives of Americans, and that is par for the course... The Republicans will not spend money for any good this society needs, but they will spend money and lives for the evils no one should afford...I don't say one party is better than the other...It is impossible for organizations to have courage, or honor because these are the attributes of people...Nor can we expect our parties to have intelligence... They do not have the answer... No one who is a product of the form can judge the form... The form works for Mr. Obama... He was elected president... He is an attorney... He went to college...He is not the child of slaves having to lift a slave mentality to raise his social status...What we need most is revolution, and a complete change of forms... What we need most we will never get from our leaders, not our political, our social, or our religious leaders... What we need most we have to make for ourselves... We need to reform our relationship with each other, and not as democrats, or republicans; but as human beings... I can see most republicans as being human, and having human qualities; but they often accept violence as a solution and theft as a virtue... Nixon stole an election that the democrats were all too willing to give away... With Mr. Obama, the situation was reversed...As Lincoln said of one of his generals, the republicans looked like a duck that had been hit on the head... The people are angry enough...The republican and democratic people cannot get beans form their government, not the good, nor the moral leadership... Our taxes are wasted on keeping the monster alive...It is time for a new birth of freedom...Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #2
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Mon Oct 26, 2009 5:26 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right: comments policy
Pat Buchanan
Feb. `16
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 1 2 3 4 5
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Authorís Podcast
Walter Williams
Walter E. WilliamsUpdated 10 Feb 2016
David Limbaugh
David LimbaughUpdated 9 Feb 2016
Froma Harrop
Froma HarropUpdated 9 Feb 2016

18 Sep 2009 Race and Stupidity

27 May 2008 How the West Lost the World

17 Jul 2007 Tonkin Gulf II and the Guns of August?