creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Patrick Buchanan
Pat Buchanan
14 Feb 2012
On to Tehran -- or Is It Damascus?

Our War Party has been temporarily diverted from its clamor for war on Iran by the insurrection against the … Read More.

10 Feb 2012
Obama's Trampling on God's Turf Now

Yes, Virginia, there is a religious war going on. It is for the soul of America. And traditional Christianity … Read More.

7 Feb 2012
Who Wants War With Iran?

Appearing alongside CIA Director David Petraeus before the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence last week, … Read More.

Ghettoizing Barack

Share Comment

"I guess this is how the West was won," Hillary Clinton exulted at her victory rally in Las Vegas after the Democratic caucuses.

Well, not exactly, ma'am. Yet how the Clintons, by deftly playing the race and gender cards, turned back the greatest single challenge to a Clinton Restoration will be studied for a long time to come.

It began in Iowa, where Barack Obama, the first African-American crossover candidate with broad appeal to all racial and ethnic groups, was on fire in a state that was overwhelmingly white.

Came then Billy Shaheen, the Clinton New Hampshire co-chair, to suggest that, were Barack to be nominated, Republicans would ask when he had stopped using drugs and whether he ever bought or sold drugs. Mark Penn of the Clinton campaign denied on MSNBC's "Hardball" that his team was raising the "cocaine issue."

Mission accomplished, Shaheen dutifully resigned. Bill Clinton drove the point home, telling an interviewer that to nominate Obama would be a "roll of the dice."

Nevertheless, Barack won Iowa going away and stormed into New Hampshire for what pundits predicted would be a defeat for Hillary so crushing it would be the final chapter of the Clinton era.

Then Bill Clinton told a Dartmouth audience that Obama's claim to being consistently antiwar was a "fairy tale."

That, plus the media pile-on, Barack's snide dismissal of her in the debate — "You're popular enough, Hillary" — and her choked-up moment hours before voting began caused the women of New Hampshire to rally in sympathy. Obama's lead, estimated by some at 15 points, vanished, and Hillary won what became one of the great upsets in New Hampshire history.

Stunned and stung, Barack's African-American backers then rushed into the baited trap. One after another, they headed for the TV cameras to charge that the Clintons had fought dirty, forcing voters to focus on the race and gender of the candidates rather than on their records, ideas and issues.

When Hillary said sweetly that while Dr. Martin Luther King was the inspirational leader of the civil rights revolution, LBJ was the indispensable leader who had enacted the laws, King, martyr-hero of black America, became an issue.

As the raillery grew acrimonious and the rage among Barack's backers rose, his black support solidified, but his white support, recoiling from race politics, peeled away.

And the sisterhood rallied to Hillary.

Robert Johnson of Black Entertainment Television then stoked the fire once more, asserting that when Bill and Hillary were fighting for civil rights, Barack was in Chicago doing whatever he was doing in the neighborhoods. The implication: Barack was doing drugs, while Bill and Hillary marched. Denying malevolent intent, Johnson, too, apologized.

But the damage has been done. And reviewing the returns from Nevada and the polls in South Carolina, it may be irreversible. Barack is no longer a crossover candidate who transcends race. The color-blind coalition he seemed to be assembling appears to be coming apart.

His momentum is gone. The emotional movement that was Iowa has passed. The media are no longer smitten. And as African-Americans rally to him, Democratic women, a majority of the party, are rallying around Hillary.

Consider the stark Nevada returns. Though Barack used as the refrain of his concession speech in New Hampshire "Yes, we can!" — the battle cry of Hispanics, "Si, se puede" — though he was endorsed by the Culinary Workers Union, he lost Hispanics by nearly two to one.

Equally ominous, he lost both the white vote and the women's vote by the same three-to-two margin, while sweeping the African-American vote five to one. Once a candidate who happened to be black, Obama is now the black candidate.

This may be a portent of what is to come. With Hispanics, whites and women a huge majority of Democrats, Hillary should sweep a majority of states in the Southwest and the West, including Texas and California, where African-Americans are relatively few in number and Hispanics are many.

If Barack loses South Carolina, he is cooked, as the Clintonites have made him the favorite. Even if he carries South Carolina, it will be written off as black folks coming out for a native son.

Folks will look instead at how well, or badly, he does among whites. If Hillary and Edwards crush him among white voters, the message will be that the Democratic Party will risk ruin if it nominates an African-American who has shown little appeal among whites and even less among Hispanics. For whites and Hispanics are the swing votes in presidential politics.

In three weeks, Barack has been ghettoized. The crossover candidate, the great liberal hope, has become a Jesse Jackson, who is ceded the black vote and a few states, then given a speaking role at the convention, as the party moves on to the serious business of electing a president.

One cannot deny that Bill Clinton was right. Nominating Barack would be a "roll of the dice." But nor can one deny that Bill and Hillary helped make sure the risk would be one the party would not take.

To find out more about Patrick Buchanan, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.


Comments

2 Comments | Post Comment
What a stretch! I mean, you're giving too much credit to the Clintons painting everything to be so planned and so well-prepared. The fact is, Obama was the one who played the race card to the hilt.
How is drug use a racial issue? It is a judgment issue and is a legitimate question to ask of a candidate who regales the soundness of his judgment.
How is mentioning MLK along with LBJ a divisive strategy? It is a legitimate point to make of a candidate who makes light of actual competence and a record of accomplishment having none to show himself. It is a legitimate point to make of a candidate who wishes to wear the mantle of MLK without working for it.
How is the comment "roll of the dice" a racial issue? It is not. It is an acknowledgment of the reality that Obama has not been vetted and that the media has not done its job in challenging the Obama camp's pronouncements.
How is the "fairy tale" comment racial? It is a legitimate point to make of a candidate who differentiates his candidacy from the rest on a speech but have subsequently failed to put words into action and actually waivered time and again on the points of the speech to account for the current political winds.
Barack doesn't have the white vote and the Hispanic vote primarily because the Clintons worked their bones to gain their trust and Barack didn't. Clintons used to have the African-American, more so than Barack - and that was because of hard work. But Barack along with his MSM enablers, chipped away this lead through race-baiting, painting every criticism leveled against them by the Clintons as racial.
Barack does not have the vote of the Hispanics because he doesn't deserve it and if the African Americans were to be more objective about it - neither does Barack deserve their votes.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Anduril919
Wed Jan 23, 2008 3:06 PM
First of all, Barak said "you're likable enough Hilary" not you're popular enough. Get it straight. Second of all, since when does a responsible journalist use ghetto as a adjective to describe someone who African-Americans have an affinity toward, or someone who has used drugs in his past. What audacity you have to make these kinds of statements about a man who has transcended color, socio-economic status, age, and gender lines to emerge as a viable, plausible candidate for the Democratic Party. The only reason Obama would not get the nomination is because of racist, ignorant people who have a voice, like yourself. To suggest that because a certain race rallys around a candidate of the same race would cause that candidate to loose his identity amoung other races is proposperous. Barak is not Jesse Jackson, Barak is not MLK JR., Barak is a man with a plan. A leader that speaks of hope, and change, and committment, recognizing that it won't be easy. Bill Clinton, once thought of as the first black President will definitely loose that title in the black community if he continues down this path. And, although Hispanic and White voters are usually the swing vote, you can't compare the elections of the past to this year's election. There is a woman, and a black man running in this race. Its uncomparable. This race has succeeded in bringing out more voters than ever before. Non-traditional voters - young people in general, blacks, poor people, etc. Although Hispanics are the largest minority, I believe Barak still has time to gain their votes as well. People have heard enough of your small mindedness Pat, you don't give people the credit they deserve as independent thinkers, and as in the past, I believe voters will surprise you.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Jamey
Mon Jan 28, 2008 10:17 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Pat Buchanan
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Judge Napolitano
Judge Andrew P. NapolitanoUpdated 16 Feb 2012
Austin Bay
Austin BayUpdated 15 Feb 2012
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 15 Feb 2012

7 Oct 2008 Of Generals and Victories

5 Jan 2007 Cakewalk Crowd Abandons Bush

21 Nov 2008 Who Killed Detroit?