creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Patrick Buchanan
Pat Buchanan
31 Aug 2010
Can the Tea Party Deliver?

"There are only two men in America who can fill Yankee Stadium on three weeks' notice," a friend … Read More.

27 Aug 2010
The Myth of Equality

In 21st century America, institutional racism and sexism remain great twin evils to be eradicated on our long … Read More.

24 Aug 2010
Only Bigots Oppose the Mosque!

Only Bigots Oppose the Mosque! "Where are the Republican leaders who will reject pandering and prejudice?… Read More.

Don't Misunderestimate Obama

With 68 percent of Americans believing George Bush has done a poor job, and 82 percent saying the country is on the wrong track, the election of 2008 will turn on one issue: Barack Obama.

If Sen. Obama can convince the people he is "one of us," and not some snooty radical liberal from Chicago's Hyde Park, who looks down upon white America as a fever swamp of racism and reaction, a la the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, the senator will be the next president.

The election of 2008 thus mirrors the election of 1980.

Then, the country wanted Jimmy Carter gone. Americans had had enough of 21 percent interest rates, 13 percent inflation and 7 percent unemployment. They wanted the Iranian hostage crisis ended, violently if necessary. After the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, America wanted a leader who would not kiss Leonid Brezhnev on the cheek but reassert American power.

The issue then was Ronald Reagan. Portrayed as some Al Capp cartoon of a crazed right-winger and B-Grade Hollywood actor given to spouting Reader's Digest bromides, Reagan was regarded as ridiculous by much of the media and too big a risk by much of the nation.

In one debate with Carter, Reagan erased the misperceptions and turned a close race into a cakewalk. That is Barack's opportunity.

A savvy politician, he has measured correctly the hurdle he must surmount and is moving expeditiously to alter an image of him forged by his own past associations and policy positions. In three weeks, he has jettisoned his new politics in a stunning display of raw pragmatism.

A prime minister must be "a good butcher," H.H. Asquith told Winston Churchill on naming him First Lord of the Admiralty, "and there are several who need to be pole-axed now." Four years later, Asquith would pole-axe Churchill over the Dardanelles disaster.

Obama is not lacking in this capacity that Richard Nixon, too, felt was an indispensable attribute of a statesman.

Samantha Power was tossed off Barack's sledge after calling Hillary a "monster" and suggesting Barack's Iraq timetable was not set in concrete. Robert Malley was canned for having talked to Hamas, though that was his portfolio at a think tank for conflict resolution.

Barack pole-axed pastor Wright and, though he said he could no more repudiate his church than his family, shortly after the second time Wright went off, Barack severed all ties to Trinity United.

Barack has spoken of how he cringed at the racist reaction of his white grandmother after she was accosted by a black man on a bus.

Grandma has now been rehabilitated in a new ad as the loving woman who inculcated good old Kansas values into little Barack.

When his own surrogate, Gen. Wesley Clark, suggested John McCain's war service did not automatically qualify him as presidential timber, a storm erupted. Barack proceeded to cut the general's legs off.

His had been one of a few Senate voices to speak of Palestinian suffering. But Barack's address to the Israeli lobby read like it was plagiarized from the collected works of Ze'ev Jabotinsky.

When the Supreme Court declared every citizen has a Second Amendment right to a handgun, Barack stood with Justice Scalia. When Scalia said the court ought not to have taken away Louisiana's right to execute child rapists, Barack was with him again.

When Congress voted the telecoms immunity from prosecution for colluding with the Bush administration in wiretapping citizens, Barack stood with Bush and the telecoms. Fearing it might cost him his huge money-raising advantage over McCain, Barack tossed campaign finance reform over the side.

In Ohio, Barack was a populist opponent of NAFTA. He is now a free-trader. Yet when economic adviser Austan Goolsbee told the Canadians pretty much the same thing, Barack disinherited him.

As July 4 approached, Barack gratuitously dissed his friends at MoveOn.org for their "General Betray Us" ad mocking Gen. David Petraeus. And that flag pin Barack got rid of after 9-11, calling it a "substitute ... for real patriotism"? It's back on the lapel.

Last week, Barack said that, after he meets with Petraeus and his field commanders in Iraq, he might "refine" his commitment to withdraw all U.S. combat brigades within 16 months.

And finally, Obama has co-opted President Bush's faith-based initiative and claimed it as his own.

What is Obama up to? Having secured the nomination, he is moving to convince the nation he is neither a black militant nor a radical, but a man of the center who will even listen to the right.

Though infuriating to readers of The Huffington Post, this may save Barack. For in Middle America folks worry less about politicians adjusting positions than about True Believers willing to go over the cliff with flags flying — and taking us with them.

Reagan was no Barry Goldwater. He knew when to "hold 'em," and he knew when to "fold 'em." Yet, America still knew who Reagan was.

We may be misunderestimating Barack. But the question of 2008 remains: When all is said and done, who is this guy?

To find out more about Patrick Buchanan, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.



Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment
Sir; With all due respect, it is not the candidate who should be the issue in any election, but plan, and policy. The news people, the pundits, and the spinners try to make it about the candidates. The candidate, if he is smart, goes along with this characterization, because a statement of policy is like a mine field that can kill friend and foe alike. And why should the people worry about who they elect if they understand the resistence of government to change? If the most radical people on the planet elected a president, does that some how free him of the machinery of government and the precious few who must lay their own futures on the line for him if he will accomplish radical change? No!... If I were advising Mr. Obama; I would tell him to keep his mouth shut and smile a lot. From what I can see it is only what a person has done, or what he says he will do in answer to hypothetical questions no man should answer that can sink him. Every time Mr. Obama takes a stand it will be like the Little Big Horn for big media. A man needs good advisers, but they too should be careful of their words. A man might be judged upon the basis of his actions, but Mr. Obama is as close to none of the above as we have had in our history. To be seen as hedging on change, and to be caught playing for re-election before being elected will put the presidency out of his reach. As far as voting for anyone on the basis of character; forget it. We do not know persons, but only personalities. Inevitably, because we have allowed ourselves to become so polarized and divided by political parties and unresolved issues, any president will find himself hemmed in, and straightjacketed in the most powerful political office in the world. It is ironic, and in a sense, sad, that the power of president can take the country to war without the full advice and consent of the people, but cannot do much good without an overwheming effort of the people demanding change. If Mr. Obama surfs into office on a tsunami of change he ought to be careful he is not washed out with the floatsom; because the people need change, and all desire it even if their ideas of change are bound up in conflict. Our problems are constitutional problems, but the constitutional solution is not expeditious, and it is not easy, but it is down right impossible. So we are left trying to elect people we do not know in the hope that they will do for us what we can no longer do for ourselves, and that is to bring about a changed society that guarantees peace, prosperity and justice for all.
Comment: #1
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Tue Jul 8, 2008 8:53 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Creators.com comments policy
More
Pat Buchanan
Aug. `10
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Deb Saunders
Debra J. SaundersUpdated 2 Sep 2010
R. Emmett Tyrrell
R. Emmett Tyrrell Jr.Updated 2 Sep 2010
Larry Elder
Larry ElderUpdated 2 Sep 2010

25 Sep 2007 Infantile Nation

30 Nov 2007 Blowback From Moscow

18 Jun 2010 What Price Afghanistan?