creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Patrick Buchanan
Pat Buchanan
25 May 2012
The Unraveling Myth of Watergate

It was, they said, the crime of the century. An attempted coup d'etat by Richard Nixon, stopped by two … Read More.

22 May 2012
What If Zimmerman Walks Free?

Three months ago, George Zimmerman, a neighborhood watch volunteer in Sanford, Fla., shot and killed Trayvon Martin. Handcuffed,… Read More.

18 May 2012
Has the Bell Begun to Toll for the GOP?

Among the more controversial chapters in "Suicide of a Superpower," my book published last fall, … Read More.

Are the Deficits Forever?

Share Comment

"The success of a party means little except when the nation is using that party for a large and definite purpose," said Woodrow Wilson in his first inaugural. "No one can mistake the purpose for which the nation now seeks to use the Democratic Party."

As with Wilson's Democrats in 1913, so it is with the Republican Party today. It has been called to power for the "large and definite purpose" of halting the growth of government and putting the nation's fiscal house in order. Whether it can succeed is another matter.

While a visitor to Capitol Hill the day the gavel was passed from Nancy Pelosi to John Boehner could not miss the confident enthusiasm of the new Republican class for the assignment history has given it, the balance of power in this city weighs heavily against its success.

Consider. To bring the budget even close to balance in half a decade means cutting projected spending for Medicaid, Medicare and Social Security. But any changes here have to be agreed to by Harry Reid's Senate, and then by Barack Obama, who has a veto that the House Republicans have not a prayer of overriding.

And as Obama showed at year's end when he agreed to a two-year extension of George W. Bush's tax cuts in return for payroll tax cuts of his own and new unemployment benefits, the White House will exact a high price for Obama's signature.

As for cutting defense, if House Republicans have the kidney for that, they will have to overcome resistance from their own neocons, hawks and lobbyists for the military-industrial complex who are former Republican members of Congress.

Will farm-belt Republicans go along with cuts in agricultural subsidies? Will bricks-and-mortar boys go along with cuts in a federal highway program that is the legacy of GOP Rep. Bud Shuster of Pennsylvania?

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the Business Roundtable, who help finance the party, have programs inside that $3.5 trillion federal budget they wish to see protected. Will a Republican House, most of whose senior members have supped at their tables, bite the hand that holds the big envelopes?

And when it comes to cutting social programs — welfare, food stamps, the earned income tax credit, unemployment insurance, Pell grants, housing subsidies — the party of Nancy Pelosi and Reid, unreconciled to its repudiation, with the aid of the mainstream media, will paint the GOP as the hard right with hearts of titanium who deny the necessities of life to the neediest while defending tax cuts for millionaires.

Can the party stand the heat, or will it get out of the kitchen?

While Republicans in 2008 seemed to accept defeat as the just deserts of their own failings, the Democratic left acts as though it were cheated of power by an unscrupulous enemy. As Republicans and their families were celebrating in the Capitol, they were being roundly cursed on cable TV by Democrats and their allies.

This is not to counsel despair. It is to suggest that the true conservatives and Tea Party true believers who gave the GOP its victory in November have won a single major engagement in a long war whose outcome remains very much in doubt.

After all, FDR's New Deal was never repealed. It was confirmed by President Eisenhower. Lyndon Johnson's Great Society was never repealed. It was consolidated by Richard Nixon. Even Ronald Reagan conceded that he had failed to control federal spending, though he cut taxes and regulations. Then came Bush I and Bush II, both of whom were, in Fred Barnes' description, "Big Government Conservatives."

The federal government now spends close to 25 percent of the entire economy, a share not equaled since World War II, while the feds collect around 15 percent of gross domestic product in taxes.

Looking back over history, the growth of government seems inexorable, almost unstoppable. And, invariably, it is has been crises that bring it about.

World War I brought a vast expansion of government. But after Wilson's war, the country turned to Republicans Warren Harding and Cal Coolidge, who cut income taxes and government back to where it consumed, when Silent Cal went home, about 3 percent of the gross national product.

The Depression, the New Deal and World War II led to the permanent expansion of government. And the postwar cuts in government never took it back to prewar levels, for the Cold War was suddenly upon us.

The end of the Cold War brought defense cuts, a peace dividend and balanced budgets under Bill Clinton and a Republican Congress, but Bush II and the neocons took care of that, with trillion-dollar tax cuts, trillion-dollar wars and trillion-dollar expansions in domestic spending.

Where, then, is the hope? It is here:

As Boehner put it, we can't kick the can up the road anymore, because we've come to the end of the road. Like Greece and Portugal, Ireland and Illinois, New York and New Jersey, we have arrived at Hotel California.

To find out more about Patrick Buchanan, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2011 CREATORS.COM


Comments

4 Comments | Post Comment
The Reps as currently constituted are a bunch of bankrupt, hypocritical, lying clowns. They were all falling on their swords to oppose Dem proposals for spending to create stimulus, BECAUSE THAT WOULD INCREASE THE NATIONAL DEBT, and then they turned around and signed on to Obama's proposal to add almost another trillion dollars to that same national debt.

Why? Because they were happy to charge middle class tax payers for REPUBLICAN goodies, regardless of what they might do to actually help the economy. They exemplify the worst kind of garbage politics are capable of: take any position you can think of to oppose your enemy and then do a 180 when the opportunity to line your pockets strikes.

They have managed to expose themselves already, have ZERO to offer in the way of real leadership, and will be toast in the next election.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Masako
Thu Jan 6, 2011 6:02 PM
Blah, blah, blah. Don't you get tired of writing the same old claptrap. That piece could have been written in 1995. Republicans don't care about big government. Every time they get in they make government bigger. They love wars, corporate largess, tax loopholes for the rich, billionaire hedge fund managers, and anything else that sends the national wealth up, not down. The only thing they really hate is seeing some of the money that could be going into their pockets dribbling away to keep people from starving or dying.

Government exists for only one reason, to return some of the money stolen from the people by greedy capitalists to it's rightful owners, the people who work hard to earn it. Paul Ryan, the current idol of this mob, proves the point by requiring that anyone who works for him read Atlas Shrugged. Read it and you'll have a complete understanding of what a Republican is.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Elwood Anderson
Thu Jan 6, 2011 7:37 PM
Government exists only for one reason, Elwood Anderson?

Clearly, you can reconcile it with reasons for which governments have existed in the ages past, where you had North African governments which existed purely to hunt, enslave, and sell white women to their populace, where you had ancient Greek governments purely for intellectual and cultural nourishment of the populace, and where you had Crusader governments purely for protecting Syrian Christians from barbaric Muslims? I am scratching my head to see if stealing white women, showing theatric plays, and killing Muslims is all part of the same plan of redistributing income from capitalists.

Joking aside, redistribution of income is a fairly novel concept introduced in practice no later than 1930s. Under Liberal governments in UK, there was a welfare state. It was not funded by taxes. It was funded by sale of goods and services on the market by government, which went to provide free meals for children and care for elderly. Beyond that, there is absolutely nothing wrong with some people having more money than others and businesses and workers negotiating pay with each other.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Prateek Sanjay
Sat Jan 8, 2011 1:02 AM
---The Buchanan 90's Show mentality has no end.

It's the globalists and the unconstitutional, illegal and eugenocidal FED that needs
to be spotligited and called out ---for prosecution.

MEANWHILE those RED Chinese bases on both our coasts, plus the Panama Canal,
plus the 'chaos by design' of immigration and our defacto, eugenocidal franchise slum
'union' with Mexico are even starting to get to the asleep at the wheel 'populist' New World Order
front ops at FOX.

Comment: #4
Posted by: anon YMUS
Sat Jan 8, 2011 5:20 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Pat Buchanan
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Roland Martin
Roland S. MartinUpdated 20 Jun 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 27 May 2012

27 Jan 2012 Who Commissioned Us to Remake the World?

19 Dec 2006 Person of the Year: Ahmadinejad

16 Dec 2008 The Toyota Republicans