creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Patrick Buchanan
Pat Buchanan
17 Feb 2012
The New Blacklist

My days as a political analyst at MSNBC have come to an end. After 10 enjoyable years, I am departing, after … Read More.

14 Feb 2012
On to Tehran -- or Is It Damascus?

Our War Party has been temporarily diverted from its clamor for war on Iran by the insurrection against the … Read More.

10 Feb 2012
Obama's Trampling on God's Turf Now

Yes, Virginia, there is a religious war going on. It is for the soul of America. And traditional Christianity … Read More.

'Buy American' -- or Bye-Bye America

Share Comment

"British jobs for British workers!" thundered Gordon Brown, as he emerged from the shadow of Tony Blair to become prime minister.

His populist sloganeering has now come back to bite him.

Across Britain, thousands laid down tools in wildcat strikes in solidarity with a walkout from a French-owned oil refinery in North Killinghome — to protest a $300 million contract to an Italian company that plans to bring in 400 Italian and Portuguese workers to fulfill it.

As Brown pleaded from the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, that Britain must not retreat into "protectionism," strikes spread to Scotland, Wales and Ulster.

Britain's commitment to let foreigners buy up its utilities and industries and bring in foreign workers to run them has backfired. Brown's own Labor Party is now angrily demanding that he live up to his pledge: British jobs for British workers.

"The Return of Economic Nationalism," wails the alarmed cover of The Economist. And understandably so.

For the stimulus bills of both Houses have a "Buy American" provision mandating that in "public works" only U.S. iron, steel and manufactures be used. The provision came out of the appropriations committee of the House on a 55-to-0 vote.

The Senate watered it down by declaring the Buy American provision must be consistent with all U.S. trade commitments. But Congress is sending a message: The rebuilding of America is to be a project of, by and for Americans, not outsourced. Sen. McCain's free-trade amendment, to strip all Buy American provisions from the bill, was routed 65 to 31

The reaction of Barack Obama, a NAFTA skeptic in 2008 with bumper stickers that read, "Buy American, Vote Obama," was to genuflect to the gods of globalism and recant his economic patriotism.

"I think it would be a mistake ... at a time when worldwide trade is declining, for the United States to start sending a message that somehow we're just looking out after ourselves," he told Fox News. We don't want to "trigger a trade war," he told ABC.

Apparently, Obama was unnerved by rumbles from Europe, which is threatening to drag us before a World Trade Organization tribunal and have "Buy American" banished forever.

But there is no easy way out now for a Democratic Party where economic nationalism is rampant. If Congress drops or Obama refuses to enforce the Buy American provision, and billions of stimulus dollars are spent on foreign iron, steel and cement, Middle America will know whom to blame.

But if Americans get the contracts, and Europeans get nothing, Europe will have to decide whether to retaliate and start a trade war with a populist and nationalist America.

We may be at a turning point in history. For we are about to choose whether to fully and finally cast our lot with globalism, or to become again a nation and people who put Americans first.

We are about to decide, perhaps for all time, whether we believe in a deepening interdependence leading to one world government, or we restore the independence won for us by the men on Mount Rushmore: Washington, Jefferson, Lincoln and Theodore Roosevelt.

All four were economic nationalists. All would today be decried as protectionists. For all believed that the nation's independence and prosperity hung upon its ability to stand alone in the world, and that foreign goods should never enjoy as privileged access to America's markets as American goods made in the U.S.A.

All four put America first. And it was they who created out of 13 rural colonies the greatest manufacturing power in history. Is not their record superior to what Bush-Clinton-Bush left us: a hollowed-out industrial nation dependent on foreigners for the needs of our national life and for the loans to pay for them?

Even John Maynard Keynes came around in 1933 to believe in "national self-sufficiency."

Those who prattle about the perils of protectionism need to be asked: What has free trade produced, but a bankrupt America that must go hat-in-hand to Beijing to borrow the money to rebuild our crumbling infrastructure? Are we also to use Chinese iron, steel and cement because they, with their Third World wages, will work for less than our fellow Americans?

As for Europe's threat of a trade war, bring it on!

We would eat their lunch. As analyst Charles McMillion writes, in eight years of Bush, Canada ran up $500 billion in trade surpluses at our expense, Japan ran up $600 billion, the European Union $800 billion.

These three trading partners, often by imposing value-added taxes on U.S. imports, and rebating those taxes on goods sold here, racked up $1.9 trillion in trade surpluses, sucking jobs, factories and technology out of the United States. These trade deficits, and the even larger ones with China, says Paul Volcker, are behind our present crisis.

America is bust. It is shameful to have to go to China and Japan to borrow the money to rebuild America. But to go to China and Japan and borrow billions, and not spend the money here, makes zero sense.

We have indulged in free trade for a quarter century. And look where it has gotten us.

Patrick Buchanan is the author of the new book "Churchill, Hitler and 'The Unnecessary War." To find out more about Patrick Buchanan, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2009 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.


Comments

5 Comments | Post Comment
elections have consequences - America as many of us is know it is gone - the age of Obamation is here - he will now instutite His new world order - for the first time in my life I feel afraid.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Marian
Tue Feb 10, 2009 4:14 AM
While I don't always agree with your positions, this time you are RIGHT ON!!
Comment: #2
Posted by: D. S. Edwards
Tue Feb 10, 2009 10:19 AM
Sir;... You may know that nationalism and socialism are two of the great forces in modern history... The greater capitalism has grown the more it has forced these notions into the consciousness of humanity... Certainly, when we, along with the British own much of the world, the last thing we're going to want is economic nationalism and isolation...It is just that we cannot take much more of our government selling off our nation's wealth because it will not tax the rich...The rich run this place...I don't know how long they thought they could export our jobs and industry, and still keep us as a market... Now, they try to restore us as a market by having the government print money and distribute it far and wide... How long is that going to last, if our money goes to support our industry, now in foreign lands??? Can anyone believe those people abroad  actually benefit???Can anyone believe the anarchy of capitalism has given a thought to the long term consequences of its actions??? They exported jobs thinking we would remain as a market... That was not thinking... Each and everyone of them acts out of individual self interest, and the end result may be their extinction as a class.... It is not that we do not want world trade....It is not that we are too nationalistic, or zenophobic... The thing is, that every country must have some balance of trade, and must not import more than it can afford against imports... We could once afford imports with our shrinking wages better than domestic production...Now that the whole nation, every job, and public and private wealth has been turned to profit and invested abroad; now we have nothing with which to buy anything...Government should be in survival mode...Instead of supporting business which refuses to support it, government should support the people and learn to tax the rich...And it might want to pull back its army too... Such an export of wealth abroad we simply cannot afford... But look then at what our pro capitalist, anti Islamist foreign policy has cost us...We have enraged the world, and now find we cannot afford our defense... We have to find some way to build up our industry, but there is no point in doing so for the rich, because as soon as we get our heads above water they will export our jobs again...We cannot let capitalism run our lives... Free enterprise and a free people are incompatible... Either we will govern industry, or suffer it continually wrecking our lives while the government impedes our self defense... We cannot live this way...Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #3
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Tue Feb 10, 2009 11:27 AM
Re: Marian;... Sir... This is the home of the brave, so if you are skird, try to keep it to yourself.... There was once a story told of Richard the Lion Hearted on his way to the Crusades...He and his companions came upon the grave of a man with the legend that the one buried there had never known fear...Richard commented that he must never have snuffed out a candle with his fingers... When we know we will feel pain we naturally feel fear... The problems facing us are such that one way or the other we are going to feel pain, and I say that because most of us are already feeling pain...I only worry that we will get used to it, and like a kicked dog, accept it as a fact of life, and not think much of it... I want us to be offended at the pain ahead, because to be less than offended means we are demoralized...But I don't want you or anyone to be afraid of anything except certain danger, and even then I want you to bear it like a man... I have seen your words...I do not expect you to do right...I hope you have the courage to act, whether rightly or wrongly rather than feel abused with no choice but to accept it... We are not dogs... Even a worm will turn, and we should too... Thanks....Sweeney
Comment: #4
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Tue Feb 10, 2009 8:16 PM
This article confused me - are the British wrong for wanting protectionism (first paragraph) or is protectionism good for us (last paragraph)?? This is an issue that has new conservatives in a muddle. The "correct" conservative view is that we should isolate ourselves and the devil take the rest. Free Trade is an invention of - wait for it - the "Liberal" party of 19th century Britain (although today they would really be regarded as centrist Republicans). However, far too many donations have been made to the Republican Party by Multinationals that are now rich thanks to exports. It was W who really pushed the whole NAFTA / CAFTA business. Once again, what IS the correct neo-con attitude on Free Trade?
Comment: #5
Posted by: David Shaw
Wed Feb 11, 2009 10:34 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Pat Buchanan
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 27 Feb 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 20 Feb 2012
Mark Levy
Mark LevyUpdated 18 Feb 2012

23 Feb 2007 The Sun Sets in the West

15 Mar 2007 Gen. Pace vs. Parson Warner

9 Dec 2011 Marco Rubio vs. Rand Paul