creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Oliver North
Oliver North
25 May 2012
Memorial Day 2012

WASHINGTON — As a crowd of high-school students offloaded from the tour bus for a visit to the Vietnam … Read More.

18 May 2012
Welcome Home, Finally

WASHINGTON — Forty-three years ago this week, the fabled 101st Airborne Division launched Operation … Read More.

11 May 2012
Institutional Arrogance

WASHINGTON — Last week, this column described a deadly suicide attack by the Haqqani network on a … Read More.

Voting With Their Feet

Share Comment

WASHINGTON — Adolf Hitler, Benito Mussolini and Hideki Tojo tried and failed. Mao Zedong, Nikita Khrushchev and Ho Chi Minh couldn't do it. But commander in chief Barack Obama may well succeed where others could not. If he has his way, he will demolish the finest force for good in the history of mankind — the U.S. armed forces. And he wants to make it all happen before the end of the year.

On Nov. 30, Defense Secretary Robert Gates released the much-leaked "Report of the Comprehensive Review of the Issues Associated with a Repeal of 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell.'" Only the Pentagon could come up with a title like that.

The "report" — 266 pages long — purports to provide military and civilian leaders in Washington with "a comprehensive assessment" and "recommendations" on changes in Defense Department regulations if Section 654 of Title 10 of the U.S. Code is repealed. The 17-year-old law states: "The presence in the armed forces of persons who demonstrate a propensity or intent to engage in homosexual acts would create an unacceptable risk to the high standards of morale, good order and discipline, and unit cohesion that are the essence of military capability." Importantly, the phrase "don't ask, don't tell" appears nowhere in the law.

Supposedly, the "conclusions" and "recommendations" proffered in the "report" are based on a "survey" of currently serving soldiers, sailors, airmen, guardsmen and Marines. Though nearly 400,000 questionnaires on changing the law were circulated, only 115,052 responded. Of those who did reply, 27 percent indicated that allowing open homosexuals into the ranks would adversely affect unit cohesion. Thirty-five percent of service members in deployed combat units said such a change would have a negative impact on combat effectiveness. Sixty-seven percent of Marines and more than 57 percent of soldiers in U.S. Army combat units believe changing the law would hurt combat efficiency, unit cohesion, readiness and retention. Notably, military chaplains — from all denominations — overwhelmingly oppose changing the "don't ask, don't tell" policy.

In a statement, Obama argued that for the first time, "both the Secretary of Defense and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff have publicly endorsed ending this policy." Yet the stunning numbers cited in the report substantiate the "military capability" clause in the current law and directly refute his claim that the law can be changed in the midst of a war "in a responsible manner that ensures our military strength and national security."

This week, in pressing Congress for urgent action to change the law, both Defense Secretary Gates and the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Adm.

Mike Mullen, once again raised the canard that Section 654 must be repealed immediately because it "forces young men and women to lie about who they are in order to defend their fellow citizens." In fact, current law does no such thing. The law simply says that those who commit certain acts should not be permitted to join the armed forces. It's not about "who they are." It's about what they do.

Apparently unmoved by the concern expressed by well over half of our soldiers, sailors and Marines deployed in war zones, Gates and Mullen now argue that Congress must repeal the law immediately or the courts will intervene. That, too, is a phony argument. Section 654 has withstood more than a dozen legal challenges since it has been on the books. The case now pending in the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals is but the most recent test. The Obama administration's "legal eagles" need only dust off old files going back to the Clinton administration to see how the law has been upheld in the past.

Obama's push to have the law repealed by this lame-duck session of Congress has been seconded by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid. But the full-court press may yet produce the political equivalent of an elbow in the face for the O-Team.

In his testimony Dec. 2, while urging the Senate Armed Services Committee to act immediately on changing the law, Mullen told the solons that service in the military is a "meritocracy" based on "what you do, not who you are." That, of course, is the very argument many of us have been making against allowing active homosexuals into the ranks.

Concerns about repeal — on readiness, retention and recruitment in the brightest, best-educated and most combat-experienced military force in history — are not assuaged by the report. Nearly 25 percent of those now serving — and as many as 32 percent of Marines — said they are likely to leave the service rather than be assigned to live with and serve beside active homosexuals.

This potential attrition — while more than 150,000 troops are serving in harm's way — hasn't diminished the O-Team's zeal for repeal. When Sen. John McCain confronted Mullen with this consequence from allowing homosexuals into the military, the admiral replied, "We'll deal with that." Gates, ever sympathetic to the needs of our troops, observed, "They can't just up and leave."

No, they can't. But when they come home, they can vote with their feet. Is wrecking the world's finest military the price we have to pay for a campaign promise? Only this lame-duck Congress knows the answer.

Oliver North is the host of "War Stories" on Fox News Channel, the founder and honorary chairman of Freedom Alliance, and the author of "American Heroes." To find out more about Oliver North and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM


Comments

3 Comments | Post Comment
News Flash: 115,000 returned surveys out of 400,000 is a good rate of return. The results that Mr. North has worked so hard to cherry picked his data from is statistically quite valid.
Why does Mr. North believe that the US military is composed of such delicate flowers that they will be unable to handle a transition that other western militarys have had no significant problems implementing? Are Israeli, British, French, and Canadian troops made of tougher stuff than ours? The truth is the we have seen this sort of issue before. Demagogues like Mr. North in another era said that the sky would fall if you forced white troops to share living quarters and meals with black troops. Integration happened and the sky did not fall. WHEN the ban is ended - have no doubt, it will, sooner or later, be ended - our disciplined professional military will make the change without significant problems.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Mark
Fri Dec 3, 2010 6:55 PM
What is the moral of the story. That when you choose to represent our country there are ethics and standards desired by our fellow men and woman. To say that Col North is being to hard on those that have issues is not a correct or fair statement. He is stating that for Americans to keep there head above would require keeping it out of the gutter and there would be better and stronger unity and would result in a more victorious armed forces. In so many words it is hard to live up to standards at times but the final outcome proves who had the guts to do it for a better government. Someday it will be run by the Lord and he is not going to choose a bunch of pansies to be in his kingdom.
Reign
Comment: #2
Posted by: Reigne
Sun Dec 5, 2010 9:29 PM
25 years ago my sisters, 15 years older than me , moved to Central Oregon where the conservative population lived a fairly rural lifestyle in a small town. Californians started to move there and to other towns in Idaho, WA, and MT. People in all of those states had bumper stickers on their cars that said, "Don't Californicate Oregon" etc. My siblings said those Californians chose to come to a small rural ski community and once they arrive they want all the amenities, rules, regulations, laws of California. Everyone just wanted them to go back to California. But today, my two sisters are two of the most liberal advocates of that laid back way of life and thought process. The whole of Oregon has slid into the deep much and mire of "left-over hippieness". Change can happen to anyone in small incremental measures over a period of time. (brainwashing)
I live in Nevada now and see it moving over the mountain here ; like the Blob, sliding over the community smothering the Nevada brains with their California Liberal group think, robotic ways, a social plan; in a one size fits all for this state. So, these liberals are moving from states where the economy is bad, but what is not reported in this article is the invisible film of propaganda they are cloaked in and are bringing with them. Their communistic thoughts and ways are pervasive as they move to a community near you. Poor Reno, NV! Harry Reid is rubbing his hands together in greed with an evil and wicked smile while welcoming them into his fold. It will be difficult for this state to ever get back to its rugged individualist principles and roots on which this state was founded.
Comment: #3
Posted by: julie
Wed Mar 30, 2011 12:00 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Oliver North
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Roland Martin
Roland S. MartinUpdated 20 Jun 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 27 May 2012

17 Oct 2008 No Debate

5 Sep 2008 Report From a Forgotten War (5th and Last in a Series)

8 Feb 2008 Women and Children First