creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Oliver North
Oliver North
25 May 2012
Memorial Day 2012

WASHINGTON — As a crowd of high-school students offloaded from the tour bus for a visit to the Vietnam … Read More.

18 May 2012
Welcome Home, Finally

WASHINGTON — Forty-three years ago this week, the fabled 101st Airborne Division launched Operation … Read More.

11 May 2012
Institutional Arrogance

WASHINGTON — Last week, this column described a deadly suicide attack by the Haqqani network on a … Read More.

The Next War

Share Comment

JUPITER, Fla. — Not one of the old "frogmen" or young Navy SEALs who gathered this week at the nearby National Navy UDT-SEAL Museum for the annual Muster wants to see another war. Those who came here are veterans of combat spanning from World War II to the present wars in Iraq and Afghanistan to numerous other unnamed fights around the world. Within their ranks are men — and their families — who know what it means to go in harm's way, often without any recognition or public acclaim.

The widow of a slain SEAL put it this way: "Before my husband deployed to Afghanistan the last time, he told me, 'It's not important our son know what I did as a SEAL. What is important is that he knows why I did it: so that he would never have to.'" Unfortunately, despite the courage and sacrifice of his parents, their young son may well face a very dangerous future.

It is an unalterable fact of human nature that the perception of weakness invites aggression. For us, it has been that way since the founding of the republic. We disarmed after the American Revolution. That's how we ended up with the War of 1812.

Just a year before a million U.S. troops were dispatched to save France in World War I, Woodrow Wilson promised our countrymen that there was no risk in cutting our defenses, because we would not be involved in "Europe's war." When the war ended on the 11th hour of the 11th day of the 11th month of 1918, we immediately slashed defense spending — and our president told us we could rely on "collective security" from the League of Nations.

In 1939, with Imperial Japan running amok in Asia and Adolf Hitler's legions on the march across Europe, the U.S. military was the 17th-largest in the world. In Washington, Republicans and Democrats — at loggerheads over President Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal economic programs — barely could agree on allowing conscription. In 1941, the draft extension passed by just one vote in the House of Representatives. By the end of the war, more than 16 million Americans had served.

Even before the Empire of Japan surrendered on Aug. 15, 1945, the Truman administration was demobilizing U.S. military personnel, ships and aircraft returning from Europe. Assurances that the United Nations would be the guarantor of global peace made Draconian defense cuts permissible over the next five years. We "hollowed out" the U.S. armed forces — just in time for communist North Korea to invade and nearly destroy the Republic of Korea. By the time the "police action" ended, more than 5 million men had been drafted into service, and more than 36,000 of them were killed — and we once again cut the size and budget of our military.

A decade of sparse defense spending yielded the Vietnam War, another 58,000 war dead and the inevitable cuts in military budgets when the conflict in Southeast Asia ended so ignominiously in 1975.

Four years of Jimmy Carter's incompetent economic strategy, blissfully naive foreign policy and devastating reductions in our intelligence services and armed forces produced disasters on a global scale. By the time Carter departed from his one term in office, we had witnessed more than a dozen anti-American revolutions, the collapse of six governments friendly to the U.S., rampant Soviet expansionism, the rise of violent radical Islam and scores of U.S. diplomats and citizens murdered and held hostage.

It took Ronald Reagan's unwavering commitment to "peace through strength" for us to begin rebuilding our nation's defenses. He overcame international opposition and congressional intransigence to fund, build and — when necessary — use U.S. forces to protect American citizens and interests. The construction of a new generation of ships, aircraft and weapons systems — including the Strategic Defense Initiative to protect American cities from attack by ICBMs — put millions of Americans to work and brought down the Soviet empire.

Two years after Reagan's second term, it took the volunteers recruited in his presidency, using the weapons and equipment built while he was commander in chief, less than 100 hours to evict Saddam Hussein's invaders from Kuwait during Operation Desert Storm. After the victory parade, we again cut our military budget to reap a "peace dividend."

The terror attacks of 9/11 required yet another "rebuild." But now, after a decade of war in Afghanistan and Iraq, the Obama administration is following the too-familiar pattern and gutting America's defenses. The O-Team already has canceled weapons systems, cut military personnel strength and stopped construction of new ships, aircraft and facilities to "save" $450 billion over the next 10 years.

Worse, unless the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction can agree on how to reduce our federal deficit, U.S. military expenditures will be cut by another $550 billion. Meanwhile, a brutal anti-American regime in Iran is moving at full speed to build nuclear weapons and the means of delivering them.

The Obama administration tells us not to worry. It promises that cutting defense won't put us at risk and that a new round of United Nations sanctions will deter the ayatollahs' atomic aspirations. But to many of the veterans gathered here, it sounds more as if we're preparing to be unprepared for the next war.

Oliver North is the host of "War Stories" on Fox News Channel, the author of "American Heroes in Special Operations" and the founder and honorary chairman of Freedom Alliance. To find out more about Oliver North and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2011 CREATORS.COM


Comments

4 Comments | Post Comment
Plenty of nuclear-capable nations are anti-American, yet none of them have bombed us. This is nothing but fear mongering.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Clucri
Fri Nov 18, 2011 8:23 AM
Deterence has long been effective primarily because potential aggressors truly did not want to provoke us to retaliate to any attack they might execute. In most rational/sane people the self-survival instinct is pretty strong.

If an individual contemplating shooting an armed police officer is deterred because he also might be killed as a result, that is also deterrence. However, to the unstable person considering an attack upon armed officers with the intent to "commit suicide by cop," dying in a Bonnie-and-Clyd hail of bullets does no deter them, rather panders to their fantasies of a glorious death.

Likewise, a national leadership that embraces a sort of "martyrdom" worldview that glorifies even "national suicide" in a radioactive blaze of glory in order to usher in a promised Messiah will be less deterred and perhaps even perversely excited by the potential that they and their country woudl be reduced to glowing crater in the ground. It merely guarantees their place in Paradise and status before their god.

Hence, for the aforementioned (re: Iran) the "not yet" argument does not put a period at the end of the sentence, rather more of an ellipsis...
Comment: #2
Posted by: Chris in N.Va
Fri Nov 18, 2011 12:06 PM
We spend more on our military than the next 15 or so nations COMBINED. How much is enough? How much more more should we borrow from China to finance Ollie's fantasy military? How much should we raise taxes to support the next war party adventure? How good is our deterrence if we are bankrupt? Time to ask the hard questions.
.
and speaking of questions, Mr. North, this is now your ninth column since the end of "Don't ask, Don't tell". (My, how time flies when you are avoiding a topic...) Still no reports of the sky falling from Ollie and his Fox "News" team? Isn't the fact that the most professional military in the world has taken this change in stride something that you are happy to report? Do you have the courage and personal integrity to admit that your dire predictions concerning the end of "don't ask, don't tell" were simply political theater?
Comment: #3
Posted by: Mark
Sat Nov 19, 2011 11:45 AM
Re: Clucri
It is incredible the amount of ignorance and the amount of naive people that permeates our society. The real scary part is that these same uneducated, uninformed people are allowed to vote.
Comment: #4
Posted by: Vince Abney
Mon Nov 21, 2011 4:40 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Oliver North
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Roland Martin
Roland S. MartinUpdated 20 Jun 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 27 May 2012

14 May 2010 Obama, Karzai and the Stench

16 Apr 2010 Tactical Pause

26 Oct 2007 Real American Heroes