creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Oliver North
Oliver North
17 Feb 2012
Shocked and Surprised

WASHINGTON — Twenty-three years ago this week, Iran's self-appointed supreme leader, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini,… Read More.

10 Feb 2012
Freedom From Religion

WASHINGTON — "We don't need you, so shut up!" That's the message the Obama administration has … Read More.

3 Feb 2012
Blacklist

Co-written by Tom Kilgannon blacklist (n.): a list of persons who are disapproved of or are to be punished or boycotted. … Read More.

The New World Financial Order

Share Comment

WASHINGTON — For the past seven years, according to Rep. Jim Moran, "We have been guided by a Republican administration who believes in the simplistic notion that people who have wealth are entitled to keep it." Actually, that "simplistic notion" has been the linchpin of the American system of free enterprise for the past two centuries. It has served to make the United States the most bountiful, wealthy and charitable nation on earth. Yet Moran says that system "doesn't work in the long run."

My fellow Americans, welcome to the long run.

The coincidence of an economic downturn and our most recent political realignment have produced calls for urgent, dramatic, decisive action. Liberal politicians, such as Moran, are suggesting that we all would be better off if we'd adopt a more punitive tax code and use the Internal Revenue Service to redistribute the wealth. Republicans and Democrats already have allied to use our tax dollars to bail out an insurance giant, mortgage companies and financial institutions that made bad loans and extended credit to borrowers who couldn't pay. Coming soon: tax dollars to save U.S. automakers. Attached to all these U.S. Treasury checks: countless pages of new fine-print regulations designed to prevent future financial stupidity — or to ameliorate its consequences. But as they say in the Marines, "You ain't seen nothin' yet."

This week, here in Washington, President Bush is hosting world leaders for a global game of "Monopoly" with yet-to-be-determined rules, regulations and restrictions. Billed as the "Summit on Financial Markets and the World Economy," the weekend seance is being described by some participants as "Bretton Woods II." For the benefit of those who have forgotten their high-school history lessons, the first Bretton Woods conference — held in July 1944 in the New Hampshire town with the same name — officially was called the "United Nations Monetary and Financial Conference." At the time, the United States was the world's only economic powerhouse, and the goal was to construct a functioning, sustainable international economic system in the aftermath of World War II. It almost worked. Almost.

After nearly two years of negotiations and three weeks of formal meetings in the Mount Washington Hotel, the 735 delegates from 44 nations agreed to create the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, the International Monetary Fund, and rules and regulations for international monetary exchanges, with gold (at $35 per ounce) as the currency standard. Since then, the IBRD has morphed into the World Bank, gold is no longer the "global standard," and thanks to costly energy imports and trade imbalances, the U.S.

has become a debtor nation. Now, with the rest of the world following the U.S. into recession, leaders of the most powerful economies have descended on Washington to "fix the problem." It's not a happy crowd.

They call themselves the "G-20": Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, South Korea, Turkey, the United Kingdom, the United States and the European Union. The IMF, the World Bank, the United Nations and the Financial Stability Forum are also "represented." Clinton-era Secretary of State Madeleine Albright — perhaps best remembered for dancing the "Macarena" with North Korean dictator Kim Jong Il — will be there for the Obama-Biden transition team. Nobel laureate Al Gore wrote in a New York Times opinion piece, "The bold steps that are needed to solve the climate crisis are exactly the same steps that ought to be taken in order to solve the economic crisis."

Unfortunately, the "bold steps" being contemplated by some of the G-20 participants may prove to be as stifling to the U.S. economy as the solution for Gore's "greenhouse gases." Among the G-20's "official representatives" are those — such as Brazil's socialist president, Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva — who blame the United States for the current economic downturn.

French President Nicolas Sarkozy, who claims credit for having come up with the idea for this confab, has said that there is an urgent need to "regulate capitalism" and that the G-20 gathering is a "great opportunity" to "build the capitalism of the future." Among other things, he wants to eliminate "offshore tax havens" and is pressing for the means to enforce new international "codes" against "excessive risk taking."

British Prime Minister Gordon Brown and others in the European Union are advocating the creation of a global regulatory agency for financial oversight and "international transparency" for banking activities. He supports giving the IMF unprecedented authority for surveillance over transactions by borrowers and lenders.

Proposals such as these will be very costly, and it won't be just the expense of yet another bloated international bureaucracy. In the rush to establish "adequate regulation and oversight" over financial transactions, too many G-20 leaders are willing to sacrifice national sovereignty and personal privacy. "In the long run," to use Moran's words, that's too high a price for Americans to pay.

Oliver North is the host of "War Stories" on Fox News Channel, the founder and honorary chairman of Freedom Alliance, and the author of "American Heroes." To find out more about Oliver North and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.


Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment
Sir;.. This nation was formed with those who had the biggest share of the rights paying for them almost exclusively with property taxes... As a commonwealth, as all republics are, wealth is held in common, and defended in common... There is no free property, and no property that can be said to be absolutely the property, only, of an individual...Rather, Property, and by extension, all wealth defended by the society must contribute to its defense through taxes... We know that labor creates value... Adam Smith said it, and others, besides Marx... As much as those who end up with the wealth want to say they have created wealth, it is a lie, a justification of injustice... Were they not able to take the whole value, and pay in wages only a portion of the value of any product -no great accumulation of wealth would be possible... Still, in the case of America, and really, in all societies, property is originally taken, and held by the government, as, in our case, from the natives... Two common legal expressions are: first come, first serve, and Fast Fish -say, We have it, and it is ours... We say possession is nine tenths of the law, as well... Actual possession is not enough by itself to establish ownership...Now, if a public purpose is seen in having some of that public property in private hands, then it is put in private hands, but not without obligation, having a long history, of paying taxes...So property is bought with a fee, but property rights, or more honestly, their enforcement, is bought with taxes... Now; this serves the purpose of government and owner, but the issue of public purpose is not considered... You may know that the ownership of property has for a long time been ended by felony... Kings from back to the dawn of recorded time have siezed the property of felons... But in this later day, almost up to the present moment, the commons, which were common property of neighbors, what we think of as covenants, have been siezed by private individuals who could show a public benefit... And, the property of the Catholic Church, which is some countries was a third to a fifth of all property was taken by the state, and turned over to tax paying individuals for a fee, and without a thought, and because the state could, because it was a fast fish, and as Melville said, they were fast to it... Now; Do you think the rich are prepared for a tax rebellion??? Because I assure you it is better to pay your dues than lose your book... Property relationships change all of the time, and it is impossible to fix them without injury long term to society... If we find an interest for society today to have private property, then there will be private property...But if the rich think to evade taxes to amass wealth when that means the destruction of the society, and wide spread poverty, then their property, which is our country will be taken from them, and sold to some other... The rich should remember that this whole country is a commons, and while they have managed to sieze much of the country, its government and courts, -still, property belongs to the nation, our covenant, and we all have a right to benefit from it....Property is not only a right, but an obligation...Wealth is not only a right, but an obligation... In fact property is no right at all without the obligation... Property, like all forms, is a form of relationship...It is not only a set of hard and fast rules... There is much give and take, as in all relationships... If any rich person thinks the poor are obligated to respect their right to property when the rich contribute nothing to the defense of that property they are dreaming.... It is your society, and if you are rich, you have rights above the average, so you must pay extra for them..I recommend that you pay what you owe for the protection you recieve..The government stands behind every title, but it cannot do so for free.....Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #1
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Fri Nov 14, 2008 3:20 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Oliver North
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 27 Feb 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 20 Feb 2012
Mark Levy
Mark LevyUpdated 18 Feb 2012

15 Jan 2010 First, the Good News ...

17 Sep 2010 The 3rd Front

4 Jun 2010 Inviting War