creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Oliver North
Oliver North
25 May 2012
Memorial Day 2012

WASHINGTON — As a crowd of high-school students offloaded from the tour bus for a visit to the Vietnam … Read More.

18 May 2012
Welcome Home, Finally

WASHINGTON — Forty-three years ago this week, the fabled 101st Airborne Division launched Operation … Read More.

11 May 2012
Institutional Arrogance

WASHINGTON — Last week, this column described a deadly suicide attack by the Haqqani network on a … Read More.

Mr. Fix-It

Share Comment

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration has replaced an old axiom, "If it ain't broke, don't fix it," with one of its own: "If it ain't broke, fix it till it is." That's certainly what the O-Team is doing to the U.S. military.

While campaigning for the presidency, then-Sen. Barack Obama repeatedly promised to "end discrimination against gays and lesbians" by the U.S. military's so-called "don't ask, don't tell" policy. Last October, he told supporters at a Human Rights Campaign dinner here in Washington, "I'm working with the Pentagon, its leadership and the members of the House and Senate on ending this policy. ... I will end 'don't ask, don't tell.' That's my commitment to you."

Of course, it's not a matter of "policy"; it's the law — and it's been on the books since 1993. Section 654 of Title 10 of the U.S. Code clearly states: "The presence in the armed forces of persons who demonstrate a propensity or intent to engage in homosexual acts would create an unacceptable risk to the high standards of morale, good order and discipline, and unit cohesion that are the essence of military capability." Notably, this language became the law of the land — not just "policy" — while American troops were engaged in Somalia.

Apparently, someone had partially educated Obama to the law he vowed to uphold, and he made a rhetorical adjustment. During his Jan. 27 State of the Union address, he said, "This year, I will work with Congress and our military to finally repeal the law that denies gay Americans the right to serve the country they love because of who they are."

Those applauding his revised pledge to the Democratic Party's base evidently missed two important points. First, there is no inherent "right to serve" in our military. Secondly, the law isn't about "who they are." It's about what they do.

By February, Defense Secretary Robert Gates, Adm. Mike Mullen, who is chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Carl Levin, D-Mich., were musing about a "moratorium" on enforcing the law in order to meet "the president's commitment." They eventually decided the Pentagon should undertake a detailed study to determine how to implement a repeal of the law. As Gates put it, "the question before us is not whether the military prepares to make this change, but how we best prepare for it."

In subsequent congressional testimony, Army Chief of Staff Gen. George Casey, Adm.

Gary Roughead, who is the chief of naval operations, Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Norton Schwartz and Marine Commandant Gen. James Conway all urged that the law remain unchanged while American troops are at war. Conway, who retires next week after more than 40 years of service, was blunt: "My best military advice to this committee, to the secretary and to the president would be to keep the law such as it is."

That advice was ignored by the O-Team. Instead, the administration worked behind the scenes with Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid to attach an amendment to the 2011 defense authorization bill, which would have required the Pentagon to implement Obama's campaign promise. The measure failed when the "sponsors" couldn't cobble together 60 votes to shut off debate before next month's elections. That's where the matter stood until last week.

On Oct. 12, U.S. District Judge Virginia Phillips issued an injunction barring the Defense Department from enforcing Section 654 of Title 10 of the U.S. Code and required the services "immediately to suspend and discontinue any investigation, or discharge, separation, or other proceeding, that may have been commenced" under "don't ask, don't tell." The Pentagon issued a flurry of orders to comply with the court order — allowing practicing homosexuals to enlist — while warning potential applicants that "the situation may change."

And change it did. On Oct. 20, in response to a plea from the flummoxed Obama Justice Department, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals granted a temporary stay of Phillips' order pending a hearing in San Francisco on Oct. 25. That should be some hearing. It's a good thing cameras aren't allowed inside federal courtrooms.

Does Phillips' order apply only to gays, or does it mean the military also must accept bisexuals and transgender people? Will military hospitals, already overwhelmed with combat casualties, be required to perform sex change operations? Do military chaplains have to conduct same-sex marriages? What will this do to military recruiting and retention in the midst of war? Nobody knows.

All of this is the result of Obama's penchant for making inane campaign promises with no coherent comprehension of the consequences. That's what happened with his ploy to close the terrorist detention center at Guantanamo Bay. Today's "don't ask, don't tell" chaos is akin to his scheme for trying Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the mastermind of the 9/11 attacks, in a Manhattan courtroom — and his support for building a mosque near ground zero. "Mr. Fix-It" makes bold promises. Someone else has to clean up the mess, especially when the mess would wreck the finest military the world has ever known.

Oliver North is the host of "War Stories" on Fox News Channel, the founder and honorary chairman of Freedom Alliance, and the author of "American Heroes." To find out more about Oliver North and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM


Comments

2 Comments | Post Comment
Members of my family have served in the military and my son was in the Army. I once worked for an attorney who had served in the Army and he was active in the guard when I worked in his private practice. During that time I had the opportunity to assist with work on new military law for the state in which I live. There is a reason for everything the military does to maintain good order. When my son came home from the military he worked for a company that had a gay member of society already working there. The man put his hands on my son and my son turned around and told him not to ever do that again. Later in time the man did it again and my son caught himself before he landed a punch that would have "flattened" the guy. I worked with a number of lesbian women at a different place of employment years later and one of them had a "crush" on me. Because she knew I was not of the same persuasion, she was angry and volatile toward me; I would not, under any circumstances, trust her when my back was turned. Our military cannot and should not deal with this kind of behavior. I have personally seen and experienced unacceptable behavior in civilian life. The military should not have to defend itself from within!
Comment: #1
Posted by: Paula Campbell
Fri Oct 22, 2010 5:15 AM
A few comments:
1. Why is our military such a delicate flower that it can't deal with a change that most the militarys of civilized world have made with little problem?
2. Since the current implementation of the law discharges someone if they are outed by a third party, the military does indeed discharge gay members for "who they are". The law says "...who demonstrate a propensity..." meaning that they are gay. This law does not require dismissal for homosexual acts only. Current law take care of sex between members of the military serving in a unit together: It is not allowed.
3. "Someone else has to clean up the mess, especially when the mess would wreck the finest military the world has ever known." Where was Mr. North when Bush was destroying our military with his foolish war of choice in Iraq?
We have been here before. Many said pretty much the same BS when the order was given to end racial discrimination in the military. The sky did not fall then and it will not fall now. When the order comes down, our professional military will take it in stride. Five years later we will be asking ourselves what all the fuss was about. Of course Mr. North's fuss is mostly about Mr. North's hatred of all things Obama.
Paula,
Should all members of a group be punished for the boorish behavior of a few? Your son experienced sexual harassment. This is not really a "gays in the military" issue in that such behavior should not be tolerated from a member of the opposite sex either.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Mark
Sat Oct 23, 2010 10:10 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Oliver North
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Roland Martin
Roland S. MartinUpdated 20 Jun 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 27 May 2012

6 Aug 2010 Snakes

14 May 2010 Obama, Karzai and the Stench

30 Oct 2009 Heroes Return