creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Oliver North
Oliver North
25 May 2012
Memorial Day 2012

WASHINGTON — As a crowd of high-school students offloaded from the tour bus for a visit to the Vietnam … Read More.

18 May 2012
Welcome Home, Finally

WASHINGTON — Forty-three years ago this week, the fabled 101st Airborne Division launched Operation … Read More.

11 May 2012
Institutional Arrogance

WASHINGTON — Last week, this column described a deadly suicide attack by the Haqqani network on a … Read More.

Heroes

Share Comment

PIERRE, S.D. — Next week, America will observe its 56th Veterans Day. It hasn't always been so. In 1938, Congress declared Nov. 11 — designated Armistice Day — a federal holiday to commemorate the 11th hour of the 11th day of the 11th month of 1918, when World War I ended. In 1954, at the urging of President Dwight D. Eisenhower, Congress changed the name of the holiday to Veterans Day to honor American veterans of all wars. Then politics intervened.

In 1968, President Lyndon Johnson pressed his cronies in Congress to pass the so-called "Uniform Monday Holiday Bill" — a measure giving federal workers three-day weekends by "moving" Washington's Birthday, Memorial Day, Veterans Day and Columbus Day to the nearest Mondays on the calendar. Congress complied, and U.S. Marines — renowned for boisterously celebrating the Nov. 10, 1775, founding of the Marine Corps — were devastated. For a decade, Marine "Birthday Balls" were staid, quiet affairs that ended early in the evening with minimal consumption of adult beverages.

Then, in 1978, thanks to the ministrations of President Gerald Ford, Congress restored observance of Veterans Day to its original date, Nov. 11. Since then, Marines have toasted their historic anniversary assured of a federal holiday the next morning. And this year, our commander in chief will "celebrate" both the Marine Corps' birthday and Veterans Day while he's making history on the most expensive overseas trip ever taken by an American head of state. The rest of us will be urged to mark the holiday by purchasing a car or a mattress to help our sputtering economy.

There's little doubt that Americans understand the economic mess we're in. We can see the foreclosure signs and the empty storefronts, and most of us know someone who has lost a job. These are tough times — and it was reflected in this week's midterm elections. Public opinion surveys show that more than 61 percent of our fellow citizens believe the country has been heading in the wrong direction. Overwhelmingly, we cast votes to elect legislators, mayors, county supervisors and governors who represent traditional American values, who will stop the rampant expansion of government spending, intrusion and taxation in our lives and who offer hope for a better future.

Unlike the 2006 midterm elections — when "the war" was the major issue and Republicans lost 36 seats and majority control in Congress — this time combat in southwest Asia was hardly mentioned by the victors or the losers.

On the morning after his party and his policies were repudiated by the electorate, President Obama devoted a single sentence of his news conference to the war. That means political pundits and campaign consultants don't think winning or losing in Afghanistan and Iraq matters. They are wrong.

Six of the new Republican members of Congress — nearly 10 percent of those making up the new majority in the House of Representatives — are veterans of the war we have been fighting since 9/11. They have been part of the brightest, best-educated and best-trained military force the world has ever known. Their constituents expect them to cut federal spending, help make private-sector job creation easier and get government off our backs — but they don't want them to gut America's defenses to get it done.

That's what I'm hearing and seeing as I crisscross America signing my new book, "American Heroes in Special Operations." As we approach Veterans Day, that's a message Obama needs to hear, no matter how far from home he wanders.

Those buying this book are overwhelmingly veterans or their family members. Undoubtedly, they are not all Republicans, and neither are the soldiers, sailors, airmen, guardsmen and Marines I cover for Fox News. Despite the many months I have spent in the field with them, we rarely have talked politics. What we do talk about — on-air and off — is winning the war. They mean to do so. They are overwhelmingly committed to it. They volunteered to serve — as Gen. David Petraeus put it a few weeks ago when we were together in Afghanistan — "knowing they were going to war."

The bright, brave, incredibly fit and talented young Americans documented in this book — and their families here at home — are making extraordinary sacrifices for this country. They fit the classical definition of heroes: those who put themselves at risk for the benefit of others. They deserve better than to have their commitment squandered by Washington's power brokers — regardless of party affiliation.

Here in the capital of South Dakota, there is a statue of my departed friend Joe Foss. He was a U.S. Marine aviator and a World War II Medal of Honor recipient, and he served here as a legislator and a governor. He's revered for his service to the people of his state and our country. He never felt it necessary to apologize to any foreign potentate for being an American. With our nation at war, that's something else our president ought to keep in mind as he meets with all those other leaders this Veterans Day.

Oliver North is the host of "War Stories" on Fox News Channel, the founder and honorary chairman of Freedom Alliance, and the author of "American Heroes." To find out more about Oliver North and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM


Comments

8 Comments | Post Comment


And after Obamacare kicks in, many of the people in that room will be doomed as Obama's death panels will deem them not worthy of the cost of treatment.


Comment: #1
Posted by: SusansMirror
Fri Mar 18, 2011 12:01 PM
SusansMirror
You should be ashame of yourself for spreading a blatant lie.
There are no Death Panels as you so inaccurately call them.
End of Life Planning is essentially the same as a "Living Will" with the opportunity for you to talk with your doctor about what measures you would want to be taken and what measures not to be taken.
As a cancer patient myself I fully appreciate that opportunity.
Having watched my own fathers horrible death I only wish someone had done this with my mother and father.
And to Susan Estrich....you should write a response on just this topic and set it straight once more. Don't let the lies stand. Take a clue from Anderson Cooper's recent reporting.
Comment: #2
Posted by: CycleGuy
Fri Mar 18, 2011 1:03 PM
SusansMirror
You should be ashame of yourself for spreading a blatant lie.
There are no Death Panels as you so inaccurately call them.
End of Life Planning is essentially the same as a "Living Will" with the opportunity for you to talk with your doctor about what measures you would want to be taken and what measures not to be taken.
As a cancer patient myself I fully appreciate that opportunity.
Having watched my own fathers horrible death I only wish someone had done this with my mother and father.
And to Susan Estrich....you should write a response on just this topic and set it straight once more. Don't let the lies stand. Take a clue from Anderson Cooper's recent reporting.
Comment: #3
Posted by: CycleGuy
Fri Mar 18, 2011 1:03 PM
Sorry, CycleGuy, but ObamaCare creates commissions that will decide who gets what care, based on their age and other criteria. You're too old? Too bad. That's a death panel. Just cuz you kool-aid drinkers don't want to admit the horrible flaws in Obamacare, doesn't make your assertions correct. As Nancy Pelosi said, you had to pass the bill to know what's in it. CycleGuy, unlike the congressmen who voted for it without reading it, you have a chance to read it. Even Paul Krugman claims accurately that the cost/benefit board established over private medicine by Obamacare will be able to impose “more or less binding judgments” refusing care, and moreover, that these refusals will save “a lot of money” in the context of treating the elderly (and others, such as people with disabilities and terminal illnesses). He says that the panel will prevent treatment that isn't “medically” useful. And rationing organ transplants is another form of a death panel.
Comment: #4
Posted by: Lesley Barnard
Sat Mar 19, 2011 12:43 PM
Cycleguy - as the husband of a breast cancer survivor I'm disgusted at your comment. Every day my wife reads reports on the breast cancer boards she subscribes to about the refusal by various governments to provide cancer treatments that are available here in the US through their own national health care services.
Why? Because the various governing boards have decreed that the treatments are too expensive in light of the "outcomes" they have observed or expect. If this isn't a Death Panel I don't know what is.
Simple fact - under Obamacare there are many unknowns, but there are at least two certainties: children will suffer and people will die.
Comment: #5
Posted by: Winston Galt
Sun Mar 20, 2011 11:59 AM
Why change a good thing? Our current system is the best in the world. We can improve it and make it better, just let's not destroy it.
Comment: #6
Posted by: Early
Mon Mar 21, 2011 5:52 AM
They just can't let go of the 'death panel' lie. It's one of the few scare tactics they have to make people cut their own throats. You've already got the only 'death panel' you'll ever have. It's called the approval process for your HMO/Health Insurance company.
I was taught about the 'big lie' technique in school (yeah, i'm old..) to see it working in my beloved USA is breaking my heart.
Comment: #7
Posted by: GeorgeC
Mon Mar 21, 2011 3:11 PM
I wish some of you folks would resist the knee jerk Obama bashing!
There are no "death panels" in the new Health Care Law. There have ALWAYS been decisions made by insurers and panels that govern Medicare/Medicaid, and that will not change. Sadly, longshot experimental treatments will never be approved by these folks, unless they are part of clinical trials. Winston, you KNOW this. So why blame Obama when the new law doesn't even fully go into effect for three more years? And while we're on the subject, REPUBLICAN Governor Jan Brewer of Arizona has already cut off funds for people waiting for transplants and some have died. Why don't you call her the "Grim Reaper"? Let's see a little more critical thinking, please.
Comment: #8
Posted by: cadbury
Tue Mar 22, 2011 10:47 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Oliver North
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Roland Martin
Roland S. MartinUpdated 20 Jun 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 27 May 2012

30 Mar 2007 Road Kill

11 May 2012 Institutional Arrogance

21 Nov 2008 Future Leaders