Opinion> Oliver North> Heroes And Horoscopes

	10 Feb 2012 Freedom From Religion WASHINGTON — "We don't need you, so shut up!" That's the message the Obama administration has … Read More.
	3 Feb 2012 Blacklist Co-written by Tom Kilgannon blacklist (n.): a list of persons who are disapproved of or are to be punished or boycotted. … Read More.
	27 Jan 2012 SOTU Surrender WASHINGTON — It's an unwritten law of modern America that a political campaign speech should last no … Read More.

Heroes and Horoscopes

WASHINGTON — Five years ago this week, American soldiers and Marines liberated Baghdad from Saddam Hussein's Republican Guard and the foreign fedayeen who had flooded into the despot's capital. For those of us who were there, it was an unforgettable event. But as Ambassador Ryan Crocker so cogently noted this week while he and Gen. David Petraeus were testifying before Congress, "The euphoria of that moment evaporated long ago." The assembled lawmakers, perched on their raised daises, barely noted the anniversary — while subjecting the warrior and the diplomat to a 16-hour spectacle. For the general and the ambassador, it had to be an excruciating exercise in patience and bladder control.

The hearings — two in the Senate and two more in the House — all were choreographed carefully to give maximum exposure to the potentates on the Potomac. The masters of the mainstream media all were gathered. Professional protesters were present. The solons, all carefully prepared by their staffs, made their little speeches and then shamelessly angled for the best "gotcha" question to win the sound bite sweepstakes — and the honor of being replayed repeatedly on the news and entertainment channels. Like so many of these hearings, it was a bit like Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey's "Greatest Show on Earth" — without a ringmaster. I know — as they say — I've "been there, done that."

Sadly, the attending members of Congress evinced little interest in hearing from a decorated general fighting a bloody military campaign or a skillful U.S. ambassador trying to help a democratically elected government survive against brutal foreign and internal foes. Rather, it seemed as if our elected representatives would have preferred hearing from soothsayers who could read palms and interpret horoscopes. That our Congress has sunk to such a level is a sad testament to the state of our political process.

One of the inquisitors demanded to know, "Is success truly almost at hand? Or is this, you know, a commitment without end?" Not satisfied with Petraeus' response that further troop reductions would be "conditions-based," the senator insisted on a "rough estimate." The general's no-nonsense reply: "It is just flat not responsible to try to put down a stake in the ground and say, 'This is when it will be.'"

When will it end? When will we be out? When can we take the money we're spending on the war and divert it to bailing out our constituent borrowers and lenders caught up in the subprime mortgage mess? Petraeus and Crocker came equipped with facts, maps, charts and progress reports, but for this crowd, they should have brought Ouija boards, tarot cards and a crystal ball.

In the long and bloody autumn of 1944, no congressional committee chairman challenged Dwight Eisenhower to set a "reasonable timetable for a change of mission and redeployment of our troops" from Europe.

Nor did any member of Congress summon Adm. Chester Nimitz in the aftermath of the battle for Iwo Jima to answer inane questions, such as: "Can you give us any idea as to how long it will take" to defeat imperial Japan? Such timorous bleating would have been unthinkable then, and it should be today.

At the close of his remarks, Petraeus noted, "Nothing means more to those in harm's way than the knowledge that their country appreciates their sacrifices and those of their families." That sentiment may have been lacking on Capitol Hill, but it was abundantly evident at the other end of Pennsylvania Avenue.

While Congress was berating the general and the ambassador, the commander in chief was honoring one of the more than 4,000 Americans who have made the ultimate sacrifice in Iraq. In an Oval Office ceremony, President Bush presented the Medal of Honor — our nation's highest award for valor — to the parents of Petty Officer 2nd Class Michael A. Monsoor, a Navy SEAL. Mike — as his fellow SEALs called him — was killed Sept. 29, 2006, in Ramadi, Iraq, when he threw himself on top of an enemy grenade in order to spare the lives of his fellow SEALs.

His platoon commander, now a lieutenant commander with whom our Fox News team has been embedded, said of the 25-year-old hero, "He made an instantaneous decision to save our teammates." Though wounded by shrapnel in the explosion, one of those with him that terrible morning said of Monsoor's unhesitating action: "He never took his eyes off the grenade. His only movement was down toward it. He undoubtedly saved mine and the other SEALs' lives."

Monsoor is just the fourth member of our armed forces to be awarded the Medal of Honor since war was declared against us Sept. 11, 2001. Call your grandstanding members of Congress and ask whether they know the four names.

Oliver North is the honorary chairman of Freedom Alliance, the host of "War Stories" on Fox News Channel and the author of the forthcoming book "American Heroes." To find out more about Oliver North and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment

I understand your concerns with the buffoons in Congress and the media and I'm probably one of the few that watched your entire ordeal re: Iran/Contra. Could there possibly be some history there? How can you try to equate World War 11 with the fiasco that is Iraq? World War 11 was being fought by our allies long before the attack on Pearl Harbor and there was clear, defined enemy nations and allies. We didn't enter that war with a wink and a nod and a guess, and possibly false, some say contrived reasons. We were attacked in our homeland true enough, but there are few other comparisons. Don't even try to compare this administration with the true heros that guided us through the World Wars. They were great men and great leaders. Today, lives are being lost, bodies are maimed, civilians and military die daily and the Iraq people's homeland is being destroyed. All this because our President wanted to oust Saddam Hussein, declared war with little to no justification and no one to this day can explain why? The concern is expressed by Cheney when told the country is against this contrived war, he said, "so?". The American public still doesn't know who the enemy is. Iraq? The deceased Sadam Hussein? Osama Bin Laden? Or, any number of terrorists cells located in any number of countries? There are many difference between the people who sit in government today and those who were in power during the course of World War 11. In that the allies were seeking to wrest power from invaders and the Hitler regime and give the countries back to the people and governments, not try to make them a puppet nation for the US. We didn't insist on converting them from Communism or Socialism to "democratic freedom". This response to an attack on our homeland came from the Bucheny's, who ignored all their advisor's, and took it upon themselves to declare war on a nation and dictator with whom they had an axe to grind and were seeking to take power and control of a country strategically situated and rich in oil. General P will continue to be a spokesman for Busheny's war until he, like so many others, finally gets it. Then he will be no longer and someone else will be their spokesman.

Comment: #1
Posted by: liz
Sun Apr 13, 2008 6:46 AM