creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Oliver North
Oliver North
17 Feb 2012
Shocked and Surprised

WASHINGTON — Twenty-three years ago this week, Iran's self-appointed supreme leader, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini,… Read More.

10 Feb 2012
Freedom From Religion

WASHINGTON — "We don't need you, so shut up!" That's the message the Obama administration has … Read More.

3 Feb 2012
Blacklist

Co-written by Tom Kilgannon blacklist (n.): a list of persons who are disapproved of or are to be punished or boycotted. … Read More.

Clear and Present Danger

Share Comment

WASHINGTON — Now that the festivities are over, it is time for the masters of the media to stop asking inane questions of the new folks in town — such as, "How do you like your new office?" — and for the Obama administration to get down to work on a clear and present danger.

Notwithstanding the "day one" and "first week" coverage, the most pressing issue confronting the American people isn't closing "Gitmo" or the always ephemeral "Mideast peace process" in the aftermath of Gaza or even "fixing the economy." Item No. 1 ought to be preventing the world's No. 1 exporter of radical Islamic terror from obtaining nuclear weapons: Iran. Unfortunately, the new administration is not off to an auspicious start.

On Wednesday, less than 24 hours after his inaugural, the Obama White House Web site announced, inter alia , that they will engage in "tough and direct" diplomacy with Iran "without preconditions" and that he intends to use "the power of American diplomacy" to deal with "Iran's illicit nuclear program, support for terrorism, and threats toward Israel." According to the statement, the new commander in chief believes that "seeking this kind of comprehensive settlement with Iran is our best way to make progress." If that's really what Mr. Obama believes, he is — to put it politely — mistaken. This "new approach" includes little more than what our European allies have been trying for more than five years.

The White House statement suggests that if Iran abandons its effort to acquire nuclear weapons, the U.S. will offer incentives, such as membership in the World Trade Organization, new economic investment and normalized diplomatic relations. It also notes that if Iran continues its "troubling behavior," we will lead efforts to further Iranian economic and political isolation. The only difference between this proposal and the Bush administration's is that the U.S. now will have an official seat at the table while Tehran's emissaries diddle the diplomats with deceit, deception and delay.

Before issuing such a "bold initiative" and "outreach" toward the theocrats ruling in Tehran, Mr. Obama's advisers should have shown their boss the report provided late last month to French President Nicolas Sarkozy from a nonpartisan parliamentary commission on Iran's nuclear program. The report details Tehran's success in circumventing U.N.

sanctions and concludes that Iranian scientists already have the know-how to build a nuclear weapon and that unless action is taken to prevent it, they will possess all necessary technology, equipment and fissile material to deploy nuclear weapons no later than the end of next year, "perhaps sooner."

Note to Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton and CIA Director-designate Leon Panetta: President Sarkozy has shared this report with other Western intelligence and diplomatic missions, but only the Europeans appear to have read it. They are not waiting for the "new hand of progress" to do a grip and grin with a radical Iranian ayatollah who believes "Zionism should be wiped from the earth."

On Thursday, while Mrs. Clinton was doing a meet and greet with her new staff at Foggy Bottom, diplomats from the 27 states of the European Union recommended removing an Iranian exile opposition group, the People's Mujahedeen of Iran, from the EU terror list. The agreement is expected to be ratified by the EU foreign ministers when they meet in Brussels, Belgium, Monday.

If the EU determination is affirmed, only the U.S. will continue to describe the PMOI as a "terrorist organization" — a designation it earned in the 1980s, when it received support from Saddam Hussein during the Iran-Iraq war. I know because I chaired the meeting that made the recommendation. But that was then; this is now.

The PMOI, it should be noted, is the group that first alerted the world to Iran's covert nuclear program. Though most Western intelligence agencies dismissed the charge in 2002 and the U.N.'s International Atomic Energy Agency scoffed at the allegations, the information was spot on. Since then, the PMOI has provided covert surveillance and reporting on inbound and outbound Iranian arms shipments, such as the weapons-laden vessel bound for Syria interdicted this week in the Red Sea by a U.S. warship on counter-piracy patrol. Unfortunately, only the lawyers were at work Wednesday, so the Cypriot-flagged ship was allowed to proceed toward the Suez Canal with hopes that perhaps the Egyptians would find a reason to stop it.

If Mr. Obama is truly serious about getting the attention of the ayatollahs, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and the people of Iran, he ought to remove the PMOI from the U.S. terror blacklist immediately and give the EU kudos for their leadership. Such action would be an extraordinary signal of support for those who want to bring about a change in Tehran. After all, isn't "change" what this administration is all about?

Oliver North is the host of "War Stories" on Fox News Channel, the founder and honorary chairman of Freedom Alliance, and the author of "American Heroes." To find out more about Oliver North and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2009 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.


Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment
Sir;... If you were pressed into a corner, say, perhaps, in the  front of your assembled church; how do you think you would define the word  "diddle"... It is easy enough for people to throw out throw away words like that with a casual -you know- the meaning... Every body may know what diddle means... Mr. Bush may have just diddled away our best ever chance for international peace in the last eight years only to have thousands of deaths laid at our door instead... Perhaps you, and your narrow minded right wing nuts could think for a moment about your words and their implications... What you call illicit in an atmosphere of rampant international illegality can hardly be proved illicit... Israel does not count bodies, and attacks whole cities for the crimes of a few... So what if she can't get at them??? Does one crime justify another???If so; since when??? You might know from your extensive travels that some people really respond to respect... Shall we say, that they have the intelligence to build a nuclear weapon, and do not deserve respect??? No respect is all I hear from the right...Why should they wait until they are attacked before they defend themselves??? Would we??? Have we??? Some times the best defense is peace, and if they are intelligent, they do not want war... But perhaps, given the behavior of Israel and the U.S. against Islam,  it is only natural, in spite of our protestations, that we are seen as their enemy and intend them harm... Who after all, is in whose neighborhood??? Since we cannot afford another war, perhaps peace is the last best alternative... Will we get diddled... Count on it, and we may diddle them some as well... From what I have seen of diplomates, they could all use some diddling; and better some diddling from the Persians than no diddling at all.... I can't say where you have gotten any of your oddball ideas... I will tell you one thing I have found from my travels in the Great State of Michigan... We have lots of middle easterners, and plenty from the far ends of the planet as well... From what I can tell; most of them just want to leave the nonsense behind, and become loyal republicans.... They are shrewed and able businessmen, not dumb, and not lazy; and in every sense, Ideal Americans... So what are we going to do???Do you plan to nuke those people because you can't understand what they are getting at??? Why don't you try to figure out what they are getting at... They need Justice as well as us...If they think that is best achieved through religion then so what???They are not our natural enemies, but the enemy we have made; and they  have a right even without a nuclear weapon to a fair amount of respect... Some people have to learn the hard way... I don't... I respect anyone with the sense to ask for it; and I avoid trouble because it  is trouble... Don't you worry, then, about people getting diddled... Some times it is just part of a process by which people realize the other side is just folks... I don't think it should take that; but some times it does... And that is too bad, really...Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #1
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Fri Jan 23, 2009 9:19 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Oliver North
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 27 Feb 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 20 Feb 2012
Mark Levy
Mark LevyUpdated 18 Feb 2012

15 Jul 2011 'It's What We Do'

16 May 2008 Terror Terminology

4 Feb 2011 Avoiding a Jimmy Carter Moment