creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Oliver North
Oliver North
10 Feb 2012
Freedom From Religion

WASHINGTON — "We don't need you, so shut up!" That's the message the Obama administration has … Read More.

3 Feb 2012
Blacklist

Co-written by Tom Kilgannon blacklist (n.): a list of persons who are disapproved of or are to be punished or boycotted. … Read More.

27 Jan 2012
SOTU Surrender

WASHINGTON — It's an unwritten law of modern America that a political campaign speech should last no … Read More.

Be Happy

Share Comment

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration's remarkable inability to say or do the right things to aid our sinking economy, stay the collapse of our equities markets, or even build a competent Cabinet is now the stuff of cartoons, talk show fodder and late-night comedy. Who hasn't heard the one about how "this year's IRS 1040 allows every taxpayer to claim one Geithner or a Daschle, depending on how much tax you don't want to pay"? Humor may help us deal with our current financial travail, but national security is no laughing matter.

Unfortunately, this week has proved that the new administration may be no better at protecting us from incoming Iranian nuclear warheads than it is at creating jobs. It started last Sunday, when Defense Secretary Robert Gates said on NBC that Iran isn't "close to a stockpile. They're not close to a weapon at this point, and so there is some time." That same morning, on CNN, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Adm. Mike Mullen, was asked whether Iran has enough fissile material to make a nuclear bomb. "We think they do, quite frankly," he replied. The admiral added, "Iran having a nuclear weapon … is a very, very bad outcome for the region and for the world." Somehow, it doesn't seem that both Pentagon leaders can be correct.

By Tuesday, it was worse. That morning, The New York Times reported that three weeks ago, Mr. Obama wrote a confidential letter to Russian President Dmitry Medvedev suggesting that European-based ballistic missile defenses in Poland and the Czech Republic will not be deployed as planned if Moscow helps keep Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. This revelation generated an international media feeding frenzy.

Hours later, during a White House press availability with visiting British Prime Minister Gordon Brown, Mr. Obama claimed that his missive had been "mischaracterized" and denied that it was "some sort of quid pro quo." He insisted that it was merely "a very lengthy letter talking about a whole range of issues, from nuclear proliferation to how are we going to deal with a set of common security concerns along the Afghan border and terrorism." He also noted, "The missile defense program, to the extent that it is deployed, is designed to deal with not a Russian threat, but an Iranian threat."

During a visit to Madrid, Medvedev maintained, "No trade-offs have been discussed; I assure you." It didn't help.

The furor over Mr. Obama's "to the extent that it is deployed" language about the missile shield was exacerbated Wednesday by the release of a new presidential task force report on Iran by The Washington Institute for Near East Policy.

The bipartisan authors of the document, entitled "Preventing a Cascade of Instability: U.S. Engagement to Check Iranian Nuclear Progress," conclude that Iran has the means and materiel to develop a nuclear weapon within a year and sufficient fissile material on hand to produce 50 more.

The nine-page report also warns that Iranian plans to acquire Russian-made advanced anti-aircraft missiles could accelerate Israeli military plans for dealing with Tehran's threat to "wipe the Zionist entity off the earth." According to the authors, "Israeli leaders seem convinced that at least for now, they have a military option." However, the report states, "Israelis see the option fading over the next one to two years, not only because of Iran's nuclear progress and dispersion of its program but also because of improved Iranian air defenses, especially the expected delivery of the S-300."

All of this prompted more than 40 Republican members of the U.S. House of Representatives to send their own letter to the White House Wednesday night. In it, the congressmen expressed their concern that Mr. Obama's "policy does not adequately recognize the threat posed by Iran" and that the administration "may be undertaking a surprisingly unilateral action" by offering concessions to Russia.

Noting that last month, the Iranians "launched a satellite into orbit using dual-use, long-range ballistic missile technology," the House Republicans cautioned that the Obama-Medvedev correspondence "undermines NATO's endorsement" of European missile defenses and "undercuts our allies." The signatories observed, "Russia used financial incentives to persuade Kyrgyzstan to deny the U.S. access to its Manas military base in order to support coalition operations in Afghanistan."

In response, Mr. Obama said, "We've had a good exchange between ourselves and the Russians," and "we're rebooting" our relationship. Administration officials are putting out the word that Moscow is playing nice, noting that this week, they allowed a NATO supply convoy to pass through Russia to Afghanistan. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton described her meeting Friday in Geneva with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov as a "tremendous opportunity." Meanwhile, the "transparent" administration refuses to release the Obama-Medvedev letter.

In the pictures and on the tube, everyone but the House Republicans is smiling. Our president, our secretary of state and the Russians are happy. You should be, too. Now you have something to think about besides the economy. Don't worry. Be happy.

Oliver North is the host of "War Stories" on Fox News Channel, the founder and honorary chairman of Freedom Alliance, and the author of "American Heroes." To find out more about Oliver North and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2009 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.


Comments

2 Comments | Post Comment
Sir;.... This article must mean you are all cleaned up from your experience of international war crimes.... Since you are a virgin again, let me offer a suggestion.... This titanic economy has been headed for this ice burg of fate for a long time....Now, Mr. Obama is trying to turn your economy around....And I mean that figuatively because you may not have any more of a pot to pee in then the rest of us; but clearly you identify with the rich and propertied class... So; now that we are finding out that our economy is all bubble and no air, you object to Mr. Obama throwing some glue at the problem...Rationally speaking; what have the republicans done to help the situation???Rationally speaking; what did the republicans ever do but try to make this problem worse in clear evidence of the danger???? I mean, the rich were behaving for many years like the rich before the great depression, risking all, tearing down regulations, essentially trying to die with all the loot.... They were playing russian roulette, and Obama gets the blame for not stopping the bullet in the barrel...Now, I know your honor is a thing of the past...You can play the part of a born again virgin, but it does not mean a thing to me....You are working for a living, and you moan when the customer says: Moan.... But I am not buying a bit of it... You are crooked, and not at all reformed...But the society should be reformed, and the economy too... And if Mr. Obama cannot get the dead horse economy up an running it will be reformed, whether you like it or not...So, think again, and try to help the man because he is working for your class, or should I say, the same class you serve....Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #1
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Fri Mar 6, 2009 12:51 PM
To Oliver North,
Though I be a Republican, I did not trust you in your bid for office. You must have done it without Reagan's approval. All you had to say was "I am being honest."
Obama is a good solution to the problems of our recessionary decline. To just say the Treasury print more money or let the Fed have banks lend more money out will pan the economy, though. That is, it has to be stimulated to produce better quality in more quantities, if demand exists in an industry--it doesn't in banking!--with more division of labor, more innovation, and higher wages, which will drive up interest rates, inflation and pull down the exchange rate.
God bless the country!
Deitch
Comment: #2
Posted by: Robert Deitch
Fri Apr 24, 2009 3:07 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Oliver North
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Walter Williams
Walter E. WilliamsUpdated 15 Feb 2012
David Limbaugh
David LimbaughUpdated 14 Feb 2012
Dennis Prager
Dennis PragerUpdated 14 Feb 2012

24 Jun 2011 The Drawdown Begins

28 Oct 2011 Republicans and Risks

21 Dec 2007 A Christmas Gift From Our Troops in Iraq (Part 4 of Series)