creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Norman Solomon
3 Oct 2009
Rediscovering the Real Columbus

Columbus Day is a national holiday. But it's also a good time to confront the mythology about the heroic … Read More.

26 Sep 2009
A Farewell Column, But Not Goodbye

Seventeen and a half years ago — at a time when a little-known governor named Bill Clinton was running … Read More.

12 Sep 2009
The Devastating Spin for War

For those who believe in making war, Kabul is a notable work product. After 30 years, the results are in: a … Read More.

The Media's Center: A Place of Fog and Spin

Share Comment

A Democrat hasn't moved into the White House for 16 years, and — between the fog of memory and the spin of media — no wonder so much nonsense is being promulgated by news outlets about how Barack Obama must hew to "the center" if he knows what's good for his presidency.

In a typical media object lesson on the consequences of overreach by a new Democratic arrival in the Oval Office, a news article in the Nov. 14 edition of the San Francisco Chronicle reported in a matter-of-fact tone: "many political observers" say that Obama "must tack toward the political mainstream to avoid miscalculations made by President Bill Clinton, who veered left and fired up the 1994 Republican backlash."

This is a popular media fable — a kind of political morality play. Clinton moved left as he took office in January 1993, the story goes, and he thus doomed the Democrats to lose control of Congress just two years later.

But — aside from the fact that warning Democratic politicians against being "liberal" is a time-honored compulsive media ritual — the narrative is a real head-scratcher. In fact, President Clinton soon abandoned the few initial positions that he took as a new president that qualified as left-leaning.

Under pressure, Clinton quickly deserted his brief stance favorable to the rights of gays in the military. Likewise, when opposition grew against his nomination of progressive law professor Lani Guinier to be assistant attorney general for civil rights, Clinton tossed her overboard.

In June of 1993, less than five months into his presidency, Newsweek lauded Clinton's "shift to the right" and urged him to show "the backbone" to stay away from the left.

Early on, President Clinton made clear his commitments to the centers of economic power. From Treasury Secretary Lloyd Bentsen to trade representative Mickey Kantor to Secretary of State Warren Christopher, corporatist Cabinet members and envoys propelled the administration.

During the 1992 election year, Clinton had campaigned for the White House under the mantra "Putting People First." But as economic analyst Doug Henwood was to remark, Clinton swiftly morphed into a deficit hawk with an austerity plan that could have been called "Putting Bondholders First."

President Clinton quickly settled into a groove of strongly backing centrist economic policies — from scant spending for social programs to international trade deals like NAFTA — in sync with the interests of huge corporations.

But none of that stopped the mass media from routinely referring to Clinton's purported "lurch to the left" during early portions of his presidency.

The myth never died, though it was quickly ripe for debunking.

One of the most astute debunkers at the time was writer Barbara Ehrenreich. Conspicuous as the only genuine leftist with a regular column in a U.S. newsweekly (she later got the boot), Ehrenreich wrote a Time piece in mid-June 1993 that directly addressed the mythology. The incoming president's widely reported lurch to the left was "a neat parable," she noted, "but it never happened."

Ehrenreich added: "The lurch to the left is like the 'stab in the back' invented by right-wing Germans after World War One: an instant myth designed to discredit all one's political enemies in one fell swoop. … Maybe it's been so long that we've forgotten what 'left' is and how to tell it from right. At the simplest, most ecumenical level, to be on the left means to take the side of the underdog, whoever that may be: the meek, the poor and, generally speaking, the 'least among us,' as a well-known representative of the left position put it a couple of millenniums ago."

More than 15 years after Barbara Ehrenreich wrote those words, the fantasy of President Clinton's leftward tilt is still alive and well in news media. And now, it's being wielded as a club over the head of Barack Obama lest he get any bright ideas about departing from the well-trod presidential path of deference to corporate conformity.

Norman Solomon is author of "War Made Easy: How Presidents and Pundits Keep Spinning Us to Death." The book has been adapted into a documentary film of the same name. For information, go to: www.WarMadeEasyTheMovie.org.

COPYRIGHT 2008 DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.


Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment
Sir; I can't say I disagree with you; except that, by way of governing, there is no left or right; but there is left or right by way of posturing... The fact is, that the wolves are thick with the sheep, and you can't help either without helping both some.... Like it or not, you can't help the tenent without helping the landlord... You can't help the mortagee without helping the mortgager, and you can't help the employee without helping the boss... If you were Mr. Obama, I would tell you: take care of those who voted for you, and tell the rest to go along to get along... We have some hard times ahead in this country... We are going to have to find some way to talk above all the static... There is nothing right -in the way we have been led... There is plenty of blame to go around; but if Mr. Obama expects success, he ought to stay one step ahead of failure... If he is going to be damned anyway; make the republicans demand relief before giving them relief... Their people are hurting too... Make them sign on to change, and vote for it so it shoves a rag in their mouths next election... If the idea is to get through this, then Mr. Obama ought to pledge to work with any republican that works with him... That is, he ought to ask any progressive republican to support progressive government, and in return not campaign for any democrat running against him or her... Wouldn't that be fair, to suspend all the political nonsense at least until we can see a little light???What Clinton did was good for the country... Paying down the debt was good for the country; but I could have afforded another child on what that national debt cost me...You tell me, what is the pay off for responsible government if it costs you the power to govern responsibly??? Acting responsibly nearly cost Mr. Clinton the presidency just like acting irresponsibly did ... Ask the republicans what they want, and let the slow pokes lead.... You can't go any faster than the slowest one on the line... I don't like it, but the republicans will lead with their behinds if you let them....So try to keep them pointed in the right direction....Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #1
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Sat Nov 22, 2008 9:18 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Norman Solomon
Oct. `09
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
27 28 29 30 1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 27 Feb 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 20 Feb 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 19 Feb 2012

26 Jul 2008 When Will the Media Go on a Health Binge?

29 Sep 2007 The Striking Media Absence of Class War

24 Mar 2007 Media Guidance Systems: Colliding In Cyberspace