creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Norman Solomon
3 Oct 2009
Rediscovering the Real Columbus

Columbus Day is a national holiday. But it's also a good time to confront the mythology about the heroic … Read More.

26 Sep 2009
A Farewell Column, But Not Goodbye

Seventeen and a half years ago — at a time when a little-known governor named Bill Clinton was running … Read More.

12 Sep 2009
The Devastating Spin for War

For those who believe in making war, Kabul is a notable work product. After 30 years, the results are in: a … Read More.

More Warfare on Horizon with New President

Comment

After the entire grand national psychodrama of the 2008 presidential election is history, the man who moves into the White House will face a range of key issues that have gotten short media shrift throughout the nearly interminable campaign. Those issues will reshape the political battle lines in ways that the election coverage has scarcely illuminated.

Early sounds of important policy conflicts to come — not only Democrats versus Republicans but also between Democrats and Democrats — can already be heard in recent news stories, though the rat-tat-tat of campaign coverage has all but drowned them out.

"The well-advertised differences between John McCain and Barack Obama on the war in Iraq may obscure a consequential similarity between their hawkish views on the use of American military force in other places," The Washington Post reported in a story that appeared on the fourth page of the newspaper's A section. "Just two questions in the three debates between the two nominees touched on the subject, and neither has spoken at length on it during a fall campaign dominated by economic issues. Yet both have revealed a willingness to commit U.S. forces overseas for both strategic and humanitarian purposes. Both agree on a course of action in Afghanistan that could lead to a long-term commitment of American soldiers without a clear statement of how long they might remain or what conditions would lead to their withdrawal."

The news article, by longtime Post foreign-affairs reporter and editor Robert G. Kaiser, pointed out that "both candidates favor expanding the armed forces, Obama by 92,000 and McCain by as many as 150,000." And the espoused outlooks of each candidate include strong inclinations to order new military interventions: "Both speak of situations when the United States might have to commit its troops for 'moral' reasons, whether or not a vital American interest was at risk."

Of course, phrases like "a vital American interest" are ambiguous at best.

Future deployment of U.S. troops to yet-unnamed countries is speculative. But the agenda for increasing the Pentagon's troop strength in Afghanistan is very clearly on the table for the next president.

"On Afghanistan, both candidates have ended up with similar positions: send more troops, train a bigger Afghan army, intensify diplomacy, develop a more effective nation-building strategy, and stay until the situation has stabilized," the Post noted. Tellingly, the news report's concluding sentence may have been the most significant: "Neither candidate has spoken explicitly about how American and NATO forces would get out of Afghanistan."

While it would be incorrect to conflate the world views or military-related proclivities of Obama and McCain, the shared assumptions could turn out to be more important — and more hazardous — than the clear differences about the Iraq war and some other key concerns.

As you'd assume from the fact that I was an Obama delegate to the Democratic National Convention, overall I prefer Obama's positions on foreign policy. But all of us — definitely including the Washington press corps — should be ready, willing and eager to scrutinize the foreign-policy decisions of an Obama administration.

For the most part, to the extent there has been a bipartisan consensus on foreign policy in Washington, it has been an arrogant approach, often provoking enormous resentment elsewhere in the world. And the U.S. news media, overall, have praised such bipartisanship rather than fomenting tough scrutiny and vigorous debate.

Each of the last several presidents has dragged our country into war, from Panama to Iraq to Yugoslavia to Afghanistan, and to Iraq again. Unfortunately, journalistic scrutiny of the rationales for those wars has been too little and too late. In some cases, appreciable skepticism from the U.S. press never happened at all.

Journalists, and the rest of us, should resolve to engage in meaningful scrutiny during the next presidency — sooner rather than later.

Norman Solomon is author of "War Made Easy: How Presidents and Pundits Keep Spinning Us to Death." The book has been adapted into a documentary film of the same name. For information, go to: www.WarMadeEasyTheMovie.org.

COPYRIGHT 2008 DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.



Comments

2 Comments | Post Comment
America is addicted to war, most especially since we know that individually we won't be required to put our flesh in the way of that hot, rapidly moving metal nor be subjected to the physical and emotional toll combat takes on you. This addiction is courtesy of our history, which is violent, and a military, industrial, congressional compact that sees war as a way of maintaining their control of this nation and all of this is made further possible by a corporate media which sucks up to power and indeed sees itself as part of that power structure. Take a look, America, our financial system is rotten to the core, our industry is being shipped overseas and our auto industry can't or won't make cars we want to buy and yet we continue to pour huge amounts of capital and brain power into yet more and more weapons systems which are totally unneeded. Remember, we spend more on our military than the rest of the world combined and at least 8 times more than the next largest country and meanwhile we become more and more dependent on foreigners for the money to finance our policies and to make the consumer products that used to be made here. Remeber that idiotic $600 "economic stimulus" rebate we got? It was bound to fail as nearly everything we can buy with that money was made elsewhere, so after one brief spurt it all ended because the money, instead of circulating here, went overseas where the toys were made. You can't become prosperous by borrowing money from foreigners to buy the things they make and the next time someone tells you free trade is good for the American consumer, go look in the want adds for jobs listed under "consumer" and see how many you find. Unless the next president drastically cuts our military budget, re-regulates Wall Street, takes for profit health insurance out of the equation, fixes our schools and infrastructure and reworks trade deals that shuffle off American jobs to Communist China and Vietnam, among others, then this nation is headed for far worse times than we are currently experiencing.
Comment: #1
Posted by: michael nola
Sat Nov 1, 2008 8:12 AM
Sir;... More warfare is not required, and is in no sense desirable... Democracy is a defensive form of social organization, and it is correct that democracies do not threaten their neighbors, and it is because they live within their means and defend what they have, which is the most economical use of resources... If our army and businesses are spread around the world, we are not defending democracy, but defending and enlarging plutocracy... We need more justice here, and if we had that simple and desirable end we would find peace in plenty to share with humanity... The past thousand years of our history has been one of seeking peace through law, but the greater the power of law, the less justice the people enjoyed until injustice in one land spread into wars across lands and continents. Give me justice and I will give you peace... Give America Justice, and America will give peace to the world... War is not just a cause of injustice but is its result... Until we face that fact, that the essentials of justice; which all people need, cannot be taken from others; but must be given to all people by all people freely, -there will be no domestic peace, nor world peace...Thanks..Sweeney
Comment: #2
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Sun Nov 2, 2008 7:20 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Norman Solomon
Oct. `09
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
27 28 29 30 1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Betsy McCaughey
Betsy McCaugheyUpdated 15 May 2013
John Stossel
John StosselUpdated 15 May 2013
Roger Simon
Roger SimonUpdated 15 May 2013

3 Feb 2007 Groundhog Day And Media Time Loops

16 Aug 2008 Media Should Count the Local Costs of War

2 Feb 2008 History is Elusive in Media's JFK Hype