creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Mona Charen
Mona Charen
25 May 2012
Obama's Education Hypocrisy -- Again

    If you were a child in the District of Columbia school system (51st in state rankings for … Read More.

22 May 2012
Is Your 5-Year-Old Transgender?

A 5-year-old child with large dark eyes, full lips and a button nose stares out from the front page of the … Read More.

17 May 2012
Obama, Barnard and Women

The president dropped by Barnard College (my alma mater) this week to deliver the commencement address. It wasn'… Read More.

Students Share Penn State Shame

Share Comment

The initial shock of the child abuse scandal at Penn State was disturbing enough, but what came later may have been even more so.

That Joe Paterno, other coaches and members of the administration failed in a straightforward, utterly uncomplicated moral task — to protect defenseless children from rape — is almost mind numbing. No weighing of competing interests or complex variables was required. On one hand, you had children being abused and, on the other, the reputation of a hugely profitable football program. They chose the football program!

In a condign coda, they've done far more damage to the program's reputation by choosing the immoral path than they would have by doing the right thing. If the alleged predator, Jerry Sandusky, had been arrested for child abuse in 2002 (or at any point in the previous decade as reports filtered up of his criminal conduct), it would have been a one-day story. Instead, the beloved Joe Paterno has been fired. The president of the university is out, and Penn State stands revealed (and reviled) as a corrupt institution.

When people violate our standards of decency, our desire for justice demands a certain social sanction. A crime or sin is a tear in the social fabric, and our collective disapproval and censure is the way we begin to repair it. When that process breaks down, it makes us feel insecure and makes the transgression all the more threatening.

So it was almost as dismaying to see the response of a mob of Penn State students reacting to the ouster of Paterno, as it was to hear about the child abuse itself. When word of the firings first reached campus, thousands of students surged from their dorms and rampaged down the streets of State College, Pa., blowing air horns and other noisemakers in the middle of the night.

They chanted Paterno's name, threw rocks and fireworks at police, knocked down two light poles, and overturned and crushed a local TV news truck. According to The New York Times, the mob also tore down street signs, smashed car windows, and tipped over trashcans and newspaper vending boxes. Call it Occupy State College. The only missing piece was public defecation.

What they intended to convey by this mayhem is less clear.

A freshman told the Times that students blamed the media for Paterno's fall. Ah, so that's it. Well, then, the only obvious answer is to smash car windows and destroy a news truck.

A handful of the braying barbarians was arrested. But the rest returned to their dorms — presumably to finish their homework for courses in "racial categories" and "postmodern lesbianism." They probably won't reflect on the irony of a university — the kind of place where a stray word can get you cashiered for sexual harassment — being responsible for the grossest criminal negligence regarding children.

The students were angry and upset, and they've been taught to believe that their feelings, whatever they are, deserve to be expressed. Well, they don't — at least not in that way. As even the tolerant New York Times noted in its coverage, "Some students noted the irony of their coming out to oppose what they saw as a disgraceful end to Mr. Paterno's distinguished career and then adding to the ignobility of the episode by starting an unruly protest."

Here's a suggestion: What the students ought to have felt — and perhaps did feel, though they hardly have names for this antique sensation anymore — was shame. Though personally innocent, until the riot, they should have felt ashamed to be associated with an institution that allegedly enabled a serial child rapist to prey upon victims.

Their proper mood ought to have been one of sadness and a desire to make restitution. Anger, too, should have played a part. Not anger at the board of trustees for firing responsible officials, rather anger at the university's administration for permitting a profound outrage. That's the way a community with basic moral understanding behaves.

A couple of days after the riot, a larger crowd of students did hold a candlelight vigil for the victims, which was encouraging. The mood at the vigil was described as "solemn" with subdued applause for several speakers. But the students seemed unable to sustain a serious mien for very long, and, by the end, the vigil was transformed into a rally with the crowd bellowing, "We are Penn State!"

One student participant said of Paterno's firing that "having that taken away from us made us feel lost." No, they were lost long before that.

To find out more about Mona Charen and read features by other Creators Syndicate columnists and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2011 CREATORS.COM


Comments

4 Comments | Post Comment
With this and the scandal with the church in Rome, you have to wonder if society views pederasty less severely than other forms of child abuse. If those victims were girls, I bet this would have been exposed much earlier. Maybe we just need to accept that males rape is a serious issue as a people.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Clucri
Mon Nov 21, 2011 2:04 PM
This column finally made it to our paper and I am amazed by how many inaccuracies there are in it. This was written by another smug journalist who gathers "facts" by read the incorrect news from other media outlets. She rails about "thousands" students "pouring out of their dorms" and "rampaging" down the streets. First, it was a few hundred at three locations. The ones downtown weren't necessarily all students. As with any college town, the townies are a mix of students, graduates, flunk outs, and wannabee's. The gatherings ON CAMPUS were much more sedate. The students were upset because they believed (as do a lot of people) that Joe Paternao was made a scapegoat to cover up what Administration, the Board of Trustees and the Governor (who was Attorney General in 2002) knew. They also were mad that the Board didn't have the decendy to fire Paterno to his face. They called him. The midweek press conference where he could have answered questions by the press was cancelled by the University. Secondly, she criticizes the actual THOUSANDS of other students who stood against the child abuse. The press is turning this into a witch hunt. McQuery may not have "done the right thing" years ago based upon this new standard promogulated by the media. But he (and Paterno) did report the crime as what was the accepted national practice THEN. What was his reward, McQuery was fired from his job. That's a good idea -- shoot the messanger. How many people will look the other way because some sactimonious journalist gets them fired. Maybe she should have actually visited Penn State and talked to some students. PS. Why was the Mayor of Pittsburgh allowed to fire Fanco Harris from a scholarship board. He didn't commit a crime; his offense was that he spoke out against the firing of Paterno. So much for Constitutional Rights.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Ed
Sat Nov 26, 2011 4:34 PM
Second comment. Where was the press in 1999 when this first came out. A mother of a child who Sandusky touched inappropriately allowed the police to listen in on a phone call between them. Evidently, this violated the PA Wiretap Law so it was inadmissable. The DA and Police had to drop the case. The press also let it drop and moved on to the next case du jour. What if the press had done its due diligence back then? Was there a secret deal between Sandusky and the University (President and Board) so he wouldn't sue? Was there a secrecy clause? How many children would have been spared if the press had kept investigating.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Ed
Sat Nov 26, 2011 4:49 PM
If you read the comments from Barry Switzer about the episode you might change your mind. How could a whole community 'know' and not respond adequately. That includes students who, apparently, did not see the social setting as flawed. What I saw was a cultural reality that lacked clear ethical standards. As a born and bred Catholic, I would have thought that Joe Paterno, given the magnitude of the problems within his church, could see the harm and been moved to take assertive action. Switer spoke of his failings at the University of Oklahoma, my alma mater, what should have been the appropriate actions. Football became too important at Pennsylvania State University in the way that it did at University of Oklahoma in the 1970s.
Comment: #4
Posted by: charles mcgee
Sun Nov 27, 2011 6:19 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Mona Charen
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Roland Martin
Roland S. MartinUpdated 20 Jun 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 27 May 2012

1 May 2009 Expletive Deleted ... For Now

5 Feb 2010 Another Undead Conservative Idea

9 Jan 2009 What Makes for Success?