creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Mona Charen
Mona Charen
25 May 2012
Obama's Education Hypocrisy -- Again

    If you were a child in the District of Columbia school system (51st in state rankings for … Read More.

22 May 2012
Is Your 5-Year-Old Transgender?

A 5-year-old child with large dark eyes, full lips and a button nose stares out from the front page of the … Read More.

17 May 2012
Obama, Barnard and Women

The president dropped by Barnard College (my alma mater) this week to deliver the commencement address. It wasn'… Read More.

Should Boys Be Wrestling Girls?

Share Comment

Around Washington, D.C., if you mention Iowa, the first thing that will pop into most people's minds is "caucuses." But in Iowa, if you asked a local about the matchups, he'd most likely assume you were talking about wrestling. That's right, the non-metaphorical, sweaty, rough-and-tumble on the mat sort of wrestling.

This year's Iowa state championships attracted attention nationwide when the promising high school sophomore Joel Northrup (the fifth-ranked wrestler in the state) defaulted on his first match. He had drawn Cassy Herkelman, a female freshman, as his opponent, and he could not, in good conscience, wrestle a girl.

Northrup's statement was a model of clarity and simplicity: "I have a tremendous amount of respect for Cassy and Megan (Black, another female wrestler who made it to the state championships) and their accomplishments. However, wrestling is a combat sport and it can get violent at times. As a matter of conscience and my faith, I do not believe it that it is appropriate for a boy to engage a girl in this manner. It is unfortunate that I have been placed in a situation not seen in most high school sports in Iowa." Had he not declined to wrestle Herkelman, he might have won it all.

The New York Times, the AP, and other national news organizations noted that Northrup's father is a minister — the suggestion being that such peculiar and backward views as the young man expressed must be chalked up to a religious sensibility. Most of the coverage stressed the "girl against the old boys network" angle. The Times headline captured the tone: "On Wrestling Mat, Girls Still Face Uphill Struggle."

But not every issue fits neatly into the little boxes that New York Times headline writers like to arrange. The liberal template is always that conventional practices — like not having boys and girls wrestle one another — are obsolete now that we believe in pure sexual equally. Clinging to the outmoded notion that wrestling might be one sport best kept separate is evidence of sexism.

Rick Reilly, writing at ESPN.com, responded to the Rev. Northrup's view that "we believe in the elevation and respect of woman" with contempt: "That's where the Northrups are so wrong.

Body slams and takedowns and gouges in the eye and elbows in the ribs are exactly how to respect Cassy Herkelman. This is what she lives for. She can elevate herself, thanks."

Are we really sure we want to obliterate the last traces of chivalry in young men — to stamp out every trace of protectiveness from the male psyche?

Even if we agree that young women should be body slammed and gouged and hurt if that's what they've signed up for, you have to be living in a dream world not to face the other reality of co-ed wrestling: It puts the boy at a disadvantage.

Not only is any well brought up young man going to hesitate to use his full strength against a young lady, he is also going to have to be so, so careful about where he touches her. The genital areas of both sexes are off limits, obviously. But girls also have breasts. So the boys have to be very careful not to grab the girl in such a way as might cause his hands to touch her breasts if she moves in an unexpected direction. One finger slip and the wrestler becomes a sexual harasser, no? The girl, by contrast, can push and shove and grab the upper body of her opponent without impediment.

And why are boys being put in this awkward situation? Because a small minority of high school girls has decided to wrestle. According to the National Federation of State High School Associations, more than 275,000 boys competed in wrestling during the last school year — compared with only 6,000 girls. Five states — California, Hawaii, Texas, Washington, and Tennessee — sponsor girls-only high school wrestling tournaments. In the other states, girls are asked to compete against boys.

Supporters of co-ed wrestling insist that sex is the last thing on the kids' minds when they're in the arena, which is almost certainly false. These are, after all, teenagers. Even when not in close proximity to the opposite sex, even when not coming into physical contact with the opposite sex at all, a teenager will spend a generous amount of time thinking about sex.

Joel Northrup did the honorable thing by bowing out and refusing to wrestle a girl. He cited his conscience and his faith. They have been better guides for him than a misplaced gender neutrality has been to the state of Iowa.

To find out more about Mona Charen and read features by other Creators Syndicate columnists and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2011 CREATORS.COM


Comments

5 Comments | Post Comment
Uh, help me understand something here.

Men and women generally compete on gender-segregated teams in all sports played at the high school, collegiate, or professional level - football, baseball/softball, basketball, lacrosse, even swimming. Each gender has different strengths and weaknesses; it would be considered unfair to both to pit men and women against each other.

Why would wrestling be any different? If anything, it would be more so - men usually have a strength and weight advantage that would render the match completely pointless. They're physically larger and heavier. Who in their right mind would consider this fair or sportsmanlike?

That such a thing would even be considered, only demonstrates the complete lunacy of the famous Title IX.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Matt
Mon Feb 28, 2011 11:04 PM
It never fails to amaze me that people who obviously know nothing about a particular subject are moved to comment on it anyway. Signing up for wrestling (amateur wrestling, not the scripted "fake" wrestling) does not mean you will be body slammed or gouged or elbowed, etc. All of these things are illegal and penalized. Girls who do compete against boys in wrestling generally do so at lower weights where differences in muscle mass are not as pronounced. Matt obviously doesn't know that there are weight classes that prevent larger wrestlers from competing against smaller opponents. And please, we all know that the culture cops think they know what's best for women and their bodies, but I would rather let them decide for themselves .
Comment: #2
Posted by: king82
Tue Mar 1, 2011 7:29 AM
king82 is exactly correct. My daughterr wrestled all through her junior high and high school years on co-ed teams. She got her inspiration from her older brother and a girl that was on his team. She enjoyed some success against boys but usually lost to them. The weight classes allowed her to be competative and the rules against body slams, gouging and elbowing (along with head butting, biting and scratching) prevented serious injury. There are many college level women's teams and high school girls have to get their experience in high school in order to get on a college team. In states that do not have girl-only wrestling teams, that means they must wrestle boys. Their "uniforms" prevent most observers from being able to tell at a glance if the wrestlers are female or male. Not once in 6 or 7 years of wrestling did she complain that another wrestler had groped her. If groping is ones only reason for not wanting girls to compete against boys, what about homosexual wrestlers? Aren't they equally likely to "get their thrills" by groping members of their own gender? There is no way to stop that so why single out girls?
Also, Mona seems to be ignorant of the USGWA (United States Girls Wrestling Association) that sponcers girls-only tournaments throughout the country as well as a national tournament in Detroit every year. Exposure in these tournaments helps women get national attention (as witnessed by my daughter's recruitment by a college in Oklahoma while she lived in Ohio).
In the story in question, the male wrestler's father stated it clearly when he said there was nothing specific in scripture that prevented his son from wrestling a girl. The forfieture cannot be said to have happened for religious reasons. Rather, it was for a misguided "respect" for women. How much better it would have been for the young wrestler to have shown his respect for his opponent by showing her the respect she deserved for qualifying for the same tournament he did and by reguarding her as a competant athlete.
By the way there have been instances where girls have won state-wide co-ed tournaments. This has happened in California and Alaska that I know of. Men are not automatically better wrestleres than women. It depends on their skills, stamina and brains just as in any other sport or endeavor and Mona and others should accept it.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Randy
Thu Mar 10, 2011 1:06 PM
Besides, not every wrestling match ends with the strongest wrestler pinning his opponent. There are other aspects of the sport. Wrestlers are awarded 2 points for takedown and 1 point for an escape. I have witnessed many matches where the quicker wrestler won by simply taking his opponent down many times and allowing his to escape. There-by gaining one point every time until he had enought points to win the match.
Another aspect to this discussion is the similarity to racial concers in sports many years ago. In reply to matt above, blacks used to compete on segragated teams. They were somehow considered too inferior to compete with whites. It took Jackie Robinson and others to prove blacks could compete with whites on an equal level. Why should we segragate wonem wrestlers from male wrestlers? Many can compete successfully on an equal level. They should be allowed to do so. It is no more wrong to discriminate against someone for gender reasons than it was to segregate them for recial differences.
Comment: #4
Posted by: Randy
Thu Mar 10, 2011 1:17 PM
I have a daughter that loves wrestling, and does quite well at it.. I was afraid when she begain and watching her agaist the boys scared for her.. AT FIRST.. then a little 103 pound boy told her he was going to hurt her and she went on the mat ready to go, pinned him in about 1 minute and his photo ended up on the front of the news paper in the local area. She takes it 1 match at a time and does her best at each. This last weekend she had was able to wrestle agaist all girls in nationals and I know that i have more of a reason to be scared there then when she is going agaist the boys. those girls trained hard, fought hard and did great!!
Comment: #5
Posted by: shelley
Tue Apr 5, 2011 12:26 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Mona Charen
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Roland Martin
Roland S. MartinUpdated 20 Jun 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 27 May 2012

10 Sep 2010 The Rev. Jones and Both Sidesism

25 Oct 2011 Obama Doctrine: Ignore American Interests

18 Nov 2008 Quantum of Nonsense