opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Mona Charen
Mona Charen
10 Feb 2016
Day of the Demagogues

As the results of New Hampshire's primary were coming in Tuesday night, some commentators on Twitter were … Read More.

5 Feb 2016
An Open Letter to Jeb Bush

Dear Gov. Bush: There are many ways to express your love of country. One is to serve as president. In your case,… Read More.

27 Jan 2016
What's a Party For?

What is a political party? By the intensity of internecine conflict among Republicans, you might conclude … Read More.

No Individual Initiative Please! We're Americans


A plucky teller foiled a robbery attempt at Key Bank in Seattle. But the story does not end happily. When a small man in a beanie cap, dark clothing, and sunglasses pushed a backpack across the counter and announced, "This is a ransom. Fill the bag with money," teller Jim Nicholson ignored his training and "instinct took over." He lunged across the counter and attempted to grab the thief by the throat or at least to pull his glasses off. The nonplussed would-be robber bolted for the door with Nicholson on his heels. A couple of blocks away, with the help of others, Nicholson tackled the guy and held him until police arrived.

Two days later, Key Bank got in touch with Nicholson. A bonus perhaps? A commendation? Not quite. He was fired. It seems he had violated the bank's strict policy that tellers should always comply with robber demands. A Key Bank spokesman has not returned a call asking for comment.

"We always recommend citizens, including employees of institutions, be good witnesses," Seattle police Sgt. Sean Whitcomb told the Seattle Times. "When confronted by a violent criminal, it is best to comply unless they feel their personal safety is in jeopardy. It is possible that taking action and confronting the criminal may lead to the injury of the victim or other bystanders."

A nation of "good witnesses" — is that what we aspire to be? Tame victims who hand over the money and file legible police reports? Mentioned in passing in the AP's account is a factor that may be more important than any other in explaining the passivity banks require of their employees: "Police and the FBI discourage such heroics" for money that is "federally insured." Now we get to the nub.

Federal insurance has doubtless spared the nation the agony of bank runs. But by immediately replacing losses due to crime, it saps some of the righteous anger from victims. Don't attempt to nab the guy, just fill out the proper paperwork.

My husband and I had the experience of being robbed by a babysitter who found my blank checks and wrote herself the most generous compensation for a three-hour work shift in the history of baby-sitting.

I was shocked, when I reported this to bank employees, at their utter lack of interest in details about the larcenist. I had her address, phone number, and likely whereabouts. Yawn. Not interested (nor were the police — a story for another day). Bank employees assured me that our $5,000 would be immediately credited to our account. As for the thief — no action. Compensation thus undermines justice.

Deposit insurance cannot explain all of it, though. Some of this is the bureaucratization of America — the deliberate attempt to drain individual judgment and initiative from life. While Nicholson was sprinting after a thief, a Fairfax County, Va., man was issued a ticket for stopping traffic to permit a gaggle of geese to cross a four-lane highway safely.

We see Canadian geese crossing roadways all the time here in Fairfax County. Usually it's an adult goose followed by four to six fuzzy gray goslings with another adult goose bringing up the rear. One assumes a family unit. Jozsef Vamosi was driving to work around 9:30 a.m. when he saw such a family assembling to cross a busy thoroughfare. "They were walking like gentlemen," Vamosi told the Washington Post. "Like the Beatles on 'Abbey Road.'" Vamosi got out of his car, held up a hand to stop traffic and escorted the birds to the median. He then did the same thing on the other side of the road. The geese went safely on their way. "Everything came out fantastic," the Hungarian immigrant explained. That is, until a Fairfax County police officer arrived on the scene berating Vamosi and questioning his sanity. Vamosi was issued a ticket for jaywalking. A police spokesman advised, "We can appreciate the citizen's response and compassion for wildlife. But a more prudent response would be to pull off the road and use their cellphone. Call the police, and have them respond."

By the time even the most responsive police could have arrived for such a call (and don't they have more important matters to attend to?) the geese would have been pate. Nicholson and Vamosi acted on impulse — and I for one would not like to live in a country where such instincts have been ironed out of us.

To find out more about Mona Charen and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at



3 Comments | Post Comment
This is not a very responsible article. The young man in question violated the rules he knew had been set forth by his employer. He freely admitted that he did not do it out of bravely but because he got a rush from it. This behaviour endangered not just himself but other innocent people in the bank. Now if the robber had tried to assault a customer or the young man then he would have been justified in defending himself. But in this case he was not. Its only money after all and not something worth risking your life or someone else's life over. Banks have cameras and other types of security so the robber would have enventually been caught. Its certainly not a situation where indvidual initiative was violated. Someone risking their life over money is an example of recklessness and stupidity. Now if he had found out a fellow employee was stealing money and turned him in that would be a good example of individual inititive.
Comment: #1
Posted by: SJ
Wed Aug 5, 2009 9:30 AM
I agree with your views, however, it is CANADA GEESE, not CANADIAN GEESE!!!! This innacuracy caused me to wonder whether there were inaccuracies in some of the other "facts" in your piece.
Comment: #2
Fri Aug 7, 2009 6:35 AM
Having worked in banking for 20 years, I agree with the bank's actions, the teller was properly dismissed. He's also lucky that the robber left the bank without harm to himself or others. Banks once had armed guards, but, at least where I worked, the guards proved more of a danger than the robbers (having accidentally shot a customer during a robbery)and were eliminated, and the bank depended on silent alarms, surveillance cameras and exploding bait money instead. However, I do agree that there should be a more proactive approach to dealing with theft. Insured or not, criminals should be pursued and prosecuted.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Publius II
Wed Aug 19, 2009 8:39 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right: comments policy
Mona Charen
Feb. `16
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 1 2 3 4 5
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Authorís Podcast
Mark Shields
Mark ShieldsUpdated 13 Feb 2016
David Harsanyi
David HarsanyiUpdated 12 Feb 2016
David Limbaugh
David LimbaughUpdated 12 Feb 2016

2 Feb 2010 Has Obama Moved Center on Nuclear Power?

22 Jul 2013 The New Brainwashing: Women Like Hookups

6 Apr 2007 Heart and Sowell