If scientists were able to determine, beyond doubt, that the sky were actually going to fall on Monday, Oct. 6, Congress would pass legislation containing tax breaks for lobster fisherman in Maine and glue manufacturers in Paducah. It's just what they do.
The Senate version of the financial bailout bill — an emergency measure designed (we thought) to keep the world economy from tumbling into a deep recession — has been ornamented with special favors. Glancing through this bill, you find that Puerto Rican and Virgin Islands rum makers get a tax break, as do certain commercial fisherman and others who were affected by the Exxon Valdez oil spill of 1989. Makers of wooden arrows for children's toys are remembered, along with rural schools. There's a duty suspension on wool products, and television production companies get a break on expensing rules. Mental illnesses (including substance abuse) are to receive parity with other disorders in private insurance coverage, and geothermal heat pump systems will get favorable tax treatment. An estimated 24 million middle-class households would be relieved from paying the Alternative Minimum Tax (originally aimed at millionaires). It goes on and on.
Some conservative Republicans dug their heels in on the House bailout bill — which was, gulp, relatively clean compared with this. Now a 100-page bill has become a 450-page monstrosity tarted up with special favors for this one and that one. Did they just walk through Senate offices scooping up old bills and throwing them into the word processor? Some of these provisions may be perfectly good ideas. But isn't the Senate supposed to be the world's greatest deliberative body? Isn't it supposed to hold hearings and debate these things instead of bundling them all up in a "must pass" emergency bill?
We have seen a couple of weeks go by since Hank Paulson warned us that economic disaster was imminent. He claimed that he needed czar-like powers instantly. That was clearly not the case. On the other hand, the danger is obviously real. The credit crunch has begun to bite. Gold prices are spiking as investors look for safety.
Car sales are tanking. Layoffs have begun. As Congressman Paul Ryan (R-Wis.), an economist, noted when he voted for the rescue bill, "The credit spreads are going crazy. It's like nothing I've ever seen in my life."
The stakes are high.
The Democrats have nominated the most left-leaning presidential candidate in history. And they are now using this financial crisis as an opportunity to recast this election as Hoover against Roosevelt. Their narrative is simple and easy to understand (though false). Laissez-faire economics under Bush allowed capitalists to destroy the economy today just as they did during the Great Depression. The solution is to put Democrats in charge of all three branches.
Republicans have responded that much of the blame for the current mess lies with Democrats who pushed for the Community Reinvestment Act, coddled Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and resisted vigorous oversight (by, for example, accusing anyone who questioned the subprime mortgages of racism). And by the way, Roosevelt didn't get us out of the Great Depression. World War II did.
Here's the rub: If we do plunge into a deep recession in the next few weeks, McCain will certainly lose. Even if St. George the Dragon Slayer were the Republican nominee, he could not win in the midst of steep recession that began under a Republican president.
Which brings us back to the rescue bill. Young conservative stars like Paul Ryan and Eric Cantor (R-Va.) did brilliant work transforming the original Paulson plan from a free hand for the Treasury secretary to a more free market oriented rescue of the banking system. That was not, alas, enough for two-thirds of the House Republicans who voted no. They feared retribution from constituents who believed the bailout was for rich Wall Street types and doubted their own capacity, with only a month remaining before Election Day, to persuade voters otherwise. They argued that they could not vote for socialism.
But if there is no rescue bill, and the Democrats take charge of all three branches of government in a time of economic crisis, they will have the opportunity to pass legislation that will cross the line into bona fide socialism. Once enacted, as we have seen, socialism is awfully hard to undo. That would put this country on the path to becoming like Europe. And Europe is dying.
So pass a bill.
To find out more about Mona Charen and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.
COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.

|
 |
Comments
|
3 Comments | Post Comment
|
|
It seems the Democrats knew that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac was bankrupting America
this long before it was brought to public's attention! As usual, they continued to sweep it
under the rug!
What does this tell you about the Democrats? It tells Taxpayers that Joe Biden wants to be
President of United States, so badly, he's continuing to lie and play the blame game! This
was proven on the debate as he constantly scratched his face. This was a sure sign of his
covering up for himself and Obama!
Carter (1977) & Clinton, his admiminstration and greed, got America into this Wall
Street mess. Obama is now trying to dig the final grave for Americans as
Chicago is millions behind and he's looking for Taxpayers to 'fix' this. Could this
be why Obama insists on the 'debates' and his 'hyped up' speeches? Think of the
money that could and should be saved for America's future!
America, it's time to wake up and smell the coffee, while you can afford to buy it!
Priority should be 'Fair Tax' and include 'PROPERTY TAXES'! This is the only way
to end the 'Tax & Spend' politicians on every level of government!
Taxpayers are fed up and aren't going to bailout Wall Street, AIG, Fannie Mae nor
Freddie Mac? It's time to 'shut down and hunt down' the CEO's, the politicians
who backed such schemes, and the big money hounds of the insurance industry,
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac! Politicians are absolutely responsible for the
bankruptcy of these organizations and the layoffs of American jobs! If these 'so-
called pillows of the community' don't pay off this $700 billion, with their own
monies, plus the other trillions of dollars they've created, then there's bigger
reasons for Taxpayers to investigate, immediately, what's really going on!
Since politicians have so much time on their hands to make bad decisions that's
cost America everything, it's time they're put on notice that ‘their position' is now
limited to one (1) month a year'. Of course, this means a maximum salary of
$12,000.00 yearly. No more freebies, no raises, or extras, since these 'positions'
were supposed to be 'as public servants', instead of a lifetime of taking
Taxpayers money you haven't earned. Come to think of it, politicians never
served the Taxpayers only themselves!
THIS IS NOW A PROVEN FACT, ISN'T IT!
Comment: #1
Posted by: Shirley deLong
Fri Oct 3, 2008 7:55 AM
|
|
|
|
Re: Shirley deLong; ma'am...do you think Mr. Biden lost the debate? I don't think he ever got closer than when he allowed Mrs. Palin to call him Joe, when it was revealed by her actions that it was all to turn his name toward a prearranged insul that fell flat, flat, flat. If you asked me for informality, and i was a Senator, I would say sure, and for what purpose? Because if the object is to reach a point of friendship and amity then fine, call me by my name. If you want to score points trying to look smart issed what you are not well educated or knowledgable, and have been spreading every well tried lie from one end of the country to the next, then you might as well keep it formal.... Now, I abuse the heckout of people. For that very reason I try to show people proper respect. Unlike Mr. Biden, I do often impugn people's motives, and not just thier judgement only because I realize how often the prospect of personal gain warps a person's judgement. Now, far more people voted for Mr. Biden than are in the state of Alaska, counting dogs. And, I wouldn't care, and haven't cared for what party a person belongs to. If a lot of people have voted for them, I don't really care for the reason, their motive or their judgement. It is because I respect my fellow citizens that I give any respect to their representatives. So, what you call Mr. Biden's scratching his face, I call an old balding guy under a hot light trying to inconspicuously wipe a bit of sweat away. No one wants to look like Nixon against Kennedy. Everyone wants to look like Kennedy. But that low life dirty trick pulled by Mrs. Palin under the cover of civility and informality was a slam at every citizen represented by Mr. Biden. If it was me I'd just say: Call me Senator, Governor. If people can't be trusted with informality they should not have it. We may all work for the republicans, but it sure gets old being treated like a maid.....Thanks....Sweeney
Comment: #2
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Fri Oct 3, 2008 5:52 PM
|
|
|
|
Re: Shirley deLong;...And Ma'am, if you don't mind me asking, how did Fanny Mae, and Freddie Mac bankrupt America before the Nation assumed all their bad debt? If the whole country was not bankruptded by too much debt and too little of production in society then these loan sharks would not be going bankrupt. They have done squeezed all the wealth they can out of society, and the government thinks that by feeding them money they will pass it out, and the bloom of spring will burst forth. We give them good money for bad debt, but that will not change the basic dynamic at work that all the moveable wealth, and capital of the country has been put into hands already wealthy. Export all your capital, short pay everyone and give them credit instead of fair wages and watch the whole country fall into your pockets. This bailout was foolish. For the democrats to take the hit for that bailout when it is likely to break the whole country was a failed test of intelligence. It really gives the republicans an edge going into this election. It would have been better for the country to tell the world to go to hell, and tell the rich to quit feeding on us, and manage the economy like we were a country at war. To allow that anarchy with our army strung out half way around the world is another failure of intelligence. I understand the international character of capitalism. Why should we enjoy slaving for foreign masters more than our own masters? Credit has removed the choice from our lives. Credit has many a foreign tail wagging this dog. We should tell them all they are on their own. Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #3
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Fri Oct 3, 2008 6:16 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|