creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Mona Charen
Mona Charen
29 Jul 2014
Israel Supporters: Beware of Hillary

In the last several weeks, I've heard people confidently declare that the 70 percent of Jewish Americans who … Read More.

25 Jul 2014
Hamas' Triumph

Hamas, with perhaps unwitting help from President Barack Obama, is achieving its war aim: to legitimize … Read More.

22 Jul 2014
What Needs Resetting

The bodies of 298 passengers and crew of Malaysia Air Flight 17, 80 of them children, lie unburied in a … Read More.

Big Bad Capitalists?

Comment

As I write, news is coming across the wire that a bill to bail out the financial industry is likely to pass. That is a relief. We have not seen a real financial panic for 80 years — but that doesn't mean we couldn't. Just as the psychology that creates bubbles (whether for tulips or real estate) does not change over time, neither does the psychology that stampedes for safety during crashes. If large numbers of people transfer their money to Treasury bonds (as many appear to be doing already), the pool of capital available for business and personal loans will dry up and America's economy will find out what a 21st century depression looks like.

Conservatives rightly detest government bailouts of any kind. It violates our free market principles. But if some government rescue is not forthcoming, a worse scenario (from the conservative perspective) is very likely. We could slide into a deep recession just weeks before an election. As of today, banks have stopped lending to one another. When voters look around for someone to blame, they will find a fable offered by Democrats. That fable goes like this: The Republicans presided over an "anything goes" party during the Bush administration and failed to properly regulate the superrich of Wall Street. They did this because they are capitalists who disbelieve in regulation. Democrats, never wild about capitalism, will correct the lax oversight of the Republican regime and make it possible for happy days to be here again. By a 2 to 1 margin, according to a CNN poll, voters blame Republicans more than Democrats for the present crisis.

Democratic spin is working. Republicans need to wake up.

At the root of this mess is not the failure of capitalism but political interference in the market. It was Democrats who pushed for and passed the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 that forced banks to serve their "whole communities" and required them to offer loans to people who were not credit worthy. In 1995, the Clinton administration's Department of Housing and Urban Development, headed by Andrew Cuomo, implemented new regulations requiring banks to meet numerical quotas in lending and demonstrate the diversity of their borrowers.

While housing prices were rising, the bad loans were hidden.

But as soon as prices began to fall and adjustable ARMs kicked in, the defaults began.

It was Democrats who closed ranks to insulate their pet projects — Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac — from proper oversight and regulation. A New York Times article from 2003 described the opposition to a Bush administration proposal to enhance oversight: "Among the groups denouncing the proposal today were the National Association of Home Builders and Congressional Democrats who fear that tighter regulation of the companies could sharply reduce their commitment to financing low-income and affordable housing." Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) claimed of the thrifts, "These two entities Ö are not facing any kind of financial crisis. The more people exaggerate these problems, the more pressure there is on these companies, the less we will see in terms of affordable housing." Representative Mel Watt (D-N.C.) added, "I don't see much other than a shell game going on here, moving something from one agency to another and in the process weakening the bargaining power of poorer families and their ability to get affordable housing."

As for the regulations that were adopted, some, like the "mark to market" accounting rule, have taken a serious situation and transformed it into a disaster. An estimated 6 to 7 percent of home mortgages are in default (compared to 40 percent in the 1930s). Under the old cost accounting system, investment banks would have been able to manage the losses with patience and time. But the mark to market rule (imposed by many including the Securities and Exchange Commission in response to the S and L debacle and the Enron scandal) requires that banks value their assets based on what they can fetch at any given moment in the open market. Well, because the housing market was in a temporary dither, banks were forced to wildly write down their portfolios, spreading the contagion of panic even further.

The secret good news beneath today's terror is that 93 or 94 percent of America's mortgages are sound. Once the liquidity crisis is blunted and the bad loans sorted out, taxpayers should see most if not all of their $700 billion back. But the moral of the story must be understood — it wasn't lack of regulation that got us here, it was bad regulation.

To find out more about Mona Charen and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.



Comments

3 Comments | Post Comment
Capitalism is great when played by the rules. Maybe the very nature of the beast makes one forget the rules. Yes capitalism is great, your article is not. I read between the lines an accusation against the many that have been given their rightful financial opportunity since the reforms you noted. In truth, the accusation is foundless. The financiers, the congress, Alan Greenspan, Thien, all created this mess. Not the consumers. In fact, the history of why Democrat's pushed for the changes and reforms is too long and too murky to recite here but you know it. With thoughtful implementation, those reforms and changes might have been successful. We'll never know because the law of extremes kicked in. The pendulum swung. I believe accepting this bail out without collateral sucks for the majority of American's. Some of the greatest financial minds not in politics have all spoken against it, but who listens to them? With the right checks and balances, we might have had a fair and profitable middle ground.
Comment: #1
Posted by: liz
Thu Sep 25, 2008 10:28 PM
Bill Clinton and his admiminstration the 'Tax & Spend' and their greed, got America into this Wall Street mess. Now Barack Obama, along with his 'Tax & Spend' buddies, are trying to dig the final grave for Americans. Chicago is millions behind due to Obama! He's looking to Taxpayers to 'fix' his State along with Washington. This is why he insists on the 'debates' and his 'hyped up' cover ups! As usual, he and others like him, think they can cover up a lot of wrong doings by telling the America people 'everything's going to be alright'!
Guess what, America, you'd better wake up and smell the coffee, while you can afford to buy it!
The No. 1 Priority should be 'Fair Tax'. Which should include 'PROPERTY TAXES', as well as 'INCOME TAXES'. This is the only way to end the 'Tax & Spend' politicians on local, state, and federal levels and stop the mess they've gotten America into!

Taxpayers ARE NOT GOING TO BAIL out Wall Street, AIG, Fannie Mae nor Freddie Mac? Taxpayers are fed up and are saying, it's time to 'shut down and hunt down' the CEO's, the politicians who backed such schemes, and the big money hounds of the insurance industry, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and take all the money back
from them, as they, most certainly, didn't earn it and they're absolutely responsible for the bankruptcy of these organizations and the selling of American jobs to foreign countries, not the Taxpayers! If these 'so-called pillows of the community' don't pay off this $700 billion, plus the trillions of dollars they've borrowed from foreign countries and pay all monies for other bad ideas they've created, (and make sure all the Swiss and Foreign Bank Accounts they've acquired are found), then there's bigger reasons for Taxpayers to investigate what's really going on.
Everyone, including politicians, are going to have to give back. This means 'Your time is limited to one (1) month a year', and this, of course, means a maximum salary of $12,000.00 yearly. No more freebies, no raises, and extras for anything, since these 'positions' were supposed to be 'public servants', instead of a lifetime of taking Taxpayers money you haven't earned. Come to think of it, politicians never served the Taxpayers only themselves!
THIS IS NOW A PROVEN FACT, ISN'T IT!



Comment: #2
Posted by: Shirley deLong
Fri Sep 26, 2008 5:44 AM
The problem did not occur in 1977 the problem was Fannie Mae and Freedy Mac's lack of fiscal prudence. There is a board of diretors at these institutiions that is supposed to provide oversight and they did not. Even after warnings they continued to take on high risk loans with the assumption that home prices would forever escalate. If these institutions were that important to the economy that a federally funded bailout is required then there should have been more regulation not less.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Mike
Mon Sep 29, 2008 4:06 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Mona Charen
Jul. `14
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Authorís Podcast
Walter Williams
Walter E. WilliamsUpdated 30 Jul 2014
Patrick Buchanan
Pat BuchananUpdated 29 Jul 2014
Froma Harrop
Froma HarropUpdated 29 Jul 2014

26 May 2009 Are We at Peace?

23 Jul 2010 The Washington Post Finds Waste -- in Government!

21 Oct 2008 Fair Taxation?