opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Mona Charen
Mona Charen
5 Feb 2016
An Open Letter to Jeb Bush

Dear Gov. Bush: There are many ways to express your love of country. One is to serve as president. In your case,… Read More.

27 Jan 2016
What's a Party For?

What is a political party? By the intensity of internecine conflict among Republicans, you might conclude … Read More.

22 Jan 2016
Republican Hemlock Society

"I am not a member of any organized political party," Will Rogers quipped in the last century, "I'm a Democrat." … Read More.

Apologizing for America


One of President Obama's first official acts was to grant an interview to Al Arabiya, the Arabic language network that broadcasts worldwide. It signified, aides explained, the new page that Obama meant to turn in relations with the Arab and Muslim worlds. Just as he did last week in Europe, Obama began the conversation by criticizing America. Asked about relations between Israel and the Palestinians and the appointment of George Mitchell as special envoy, President Obama said " ... what I told (Mitchell) is start by listening, because all too often the United States starts by dictating — in the past on some of these issues — and we don't always know all the factors that are involved. So let's listen." Throughout the rest of the interview, Obama returned again and again to the word "respect," stressing that his administration — unlike previous American presidents — would base relations with the Muslim world on "mutual respect."

In Europe, the president returned to this leitmotif, telling his audience that "there have been times where America has shown arrogance and been dismissive, even derisive" toward Europe. He went on to note that Europeans had responded with an anti-Americanism that "is at once casual but can also be insidious." That sounds awfully high-mindedly evenhanded — except that in Obama's telling, America's arrogance comes first. If that were truly the case, who could blame the Europeans for feeling resentful?

Don't hold your breath waiting for any European to acknowledge that they have been guilty of arrogance. And before giving Obama too much credit for humility, consider that the planted axiom of these declarations is that he is different. It was that ham-handed predecessor of his who blundered through the world, disrespecting allies, needlessly insulting enemies, and crashing through drawing rooms like the proverbial bull, or perhaps like a Texas steer. But as former Ambassador John Bolton reminds us, during the glory days of the Clinton administration, French President Francois Mitterrand said this: "We are at war with America— a permanent war ... a war without death. They are very hard, the Americans. They are voracious. They want undivided power over the world." Compared with that, the most stinging rebuke to come out of the Bush administration — Rumsfeld's swipe about "old Europe" — seems downright polite.

There's nothing wrong with pleasant atmospherics, of course.

And if Barack and Michelle Obama wowed the crowds in London and Prague, that's nice. But what you might have missed in all the hyperventilating in the media about the new incarnation of Jack and Jackie was that President Obama was rebuffed by Europe. He had asked them to pass stimulus bills like the one the Democrats passed in the U.S. Germany's Angela Merkel and the others turned that down flat. European nations have even graver problems with promised social safety net programs than we do, and they sensibly decided that further indebting themselves would aggravate rather than alleviate their troubles.

President Obama further requested that more troops be sent to Afghanistan. He wasn't subtle about it either. "Europe should not simply expect the United States to shoulder that burden alone," he said. "This is a joint problem and it requires a joint effort." Adoring crowds notwithstanding, they refused that request as well. Oh, wait. That's not quite true. According to Fox News, "Belgium offered to send 35 military trainers and Spain offered 12."

Back to relations with the Muslim world. Lest this slander pass into conventional wisdom, it must be protested. George W. Bush was never disrespectful to the Muslim world. He was extraordinarily careful to telegraph his respect for the Muslim faith — some thought to a fault. ("Why is it," asked one wag, "that the only people who say Islam is religion of peace are Christians?") Bush made the Feast of Eid, which marks the end of Ramadan, an annual White House celebration with prominent Muslim guests. He arguably saved more Muslim lives through the African AIDS initiative than any other world leader could claim. Mrs. Bush made improving the lives of women and girls in Afghanistan her special project. In the immediate aftermath of the 9/11 attacks, when this was not an obvious move, he visited the Islamic Center in Washington, D.C., to telegraph to the nation that anger toward American Muslims would be a misplaced response to the atrocity.

This caricature of Bush as a heedless militarist and xenophobe — which no one is doing more to promote than the current president — is a libel.

There is one other troubling aspect to President Obama's diplomatic debut. Being eager to ingratiate oneself with Europeans is an understandable liberal impulse. The left wing of the Democratic Party reveres European welfare states. But President Obama also bowed low (literally) before the king of Saudi Arabia. That was more than courtesy; it was abasement.

To find out more about Mona Charen and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at



3 Comments | Post Comment
Ms. Charen, as usual, "gets it".
Seems too many can't stand what they feel is heresy when critically viewing our popular new president;
thank goodness she can see some of the thin spots (and risks) in his stewardship.
Hooray for a (well done ) free press !
Thank you, Ms. Charen.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Robert Mapes
Thu Apr 9, 2009 4:22 AM
Yeah, I agree with Charen. It's hard to see how Bush risking his political career (not to mention spending so much American blood and treasure) to liberate Iraq and Afghanistan could be seen as disrespectful to Muslims, or constitute any other behavior which needed apologizing for by the next administration. If Bush had wanted to be disrespectful, he at best wouldn't have said a word about Islam while going ahead with the wars....and at worst, found ways to curtail their civil liberties at home and not drawn distinctions between military and civilian targets abroad. Our enemies do both of those things, even going so far as to hide behind civilians. I'd say that Obama bowing to the king of Saudi Arabia, a tyrant over Muslims if there ever was one, is the most disrespectful act of all. (It was certainly disrespectful to the memory of millions of American GI's who fought and bled and died for the right to live free of kings & not have to bow to anyone.)
Comment: #2
Posted by: Matt
Thu Apr 9, 2009 3:26 PM
Obama has his nerve for criticizing America! Just how does he think he is? From Day one, he's criticized America and even his own "Church" (where they teach hate for Americans as so stated many times by Rev. Wright. Yet, Obama and his family never heard a word? Amazing! Acorn, Rezko, Immanual, Jackson and his other buddies that's bankrupted Chicago are now determined to take over America with their radical and socialistic ideas! This is why America needs to be run like a private business and get rid of the politicians and the criminals that's been running America, far too long, into bankruptcy!
Obamas' inexperience, cocky attitude and big mouth is going to get America into wars with many countries, and this is why none of the G20 is willing to help America! All the foreign countries want is for America to be without money and resources! It looks like we're there, already! Guess what's going to happen? Without Taxpayers' consent, Politicians borrowed trillions (that we can't pay interest on), so it's time for Taxpayers to sell them a one-way ticket to the countries they've sold America to, take all their assets, and pay off all debt, period!

Incidentally, I still have the old and new web pages of Mr. Obama's church!
Comment: #3
Posted by: Shirley deLong
Sun Apr 12, 2009 12:13 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right: comments policy
Mona Charen
Feb. `16
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 1 2 3 4 5
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Authorís Podcast
Froma Harrop
Froma HarropUpdated 9 Feb 2016
Newspaper ContributorsUpdated 8 Feb 2016
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 8 Feb 2016

23 Nov 2010 Search for Terrorists Not Weapons

16 Feb 2010 Unpacking Obama's Rationale on Terrorists

27 Apr 2007 Can You Live on Food Stamps?