creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Molly Ivins
Molly Ivins
28 Jan 2009
What Would Molly Think?

JANUARY 31, 2009, IS THE TWO-YEAR ANNIVERSARY OF MOLLY IVINS' DEATH. THE FOLLOWING COLUMN WAS WRITTEN BY … Read More.

31 Jan 2007
Molly Ivins Tribute

MOLLY IVINS BEGAN WRITING HER SYNDICATED COLUMN FOR CREATORS SYNDICATE IN 1992. ANTHONY ZURCHER IS A CREATORS … Read More.

11 Jan 2007
Stand Up Against the Surge

The purpose of this old-fashioned newspaper crusade to stop the war is not to make George W. Bush look like … Read More.

Molly Ivins October 16

Share Comment

AUSTIN — Afghanistan is to nation-building what Afghanistan is to war — pretty much the last place on earth you'd choose, if you had any choice at all. I point this out not to oppose the idea, about which I think we have no choice, but to underline that the task is hard, long and incredibly complicated. President Bush has said that from the beginning, but it cannot be said too often.

There are some signs of what could become a dangerous division in what has been an unusually unified America since this crisis began, and they have to do with a class difference in information. To oversimplify, those who are getting their information from the Internet and/or a broad range of publications are having conversations with one another that are radically different from those heard on many radio talk shows. This is more than the simplistic jingoism that is a constant in American life; this is simplistic jingoism with a dangerously short attention span. The "let's nuke 'em" crowd is still looking for a short, simple solution, and there just isn't one. The starkest evidence of this is the poll of Pakistanis just released by Newsweek, and the numbers here need to be read carefully: While 51 percent support their government's cooperation with the U.S. during the crisis, 83 percent are sympathetic to the Taliban, and almost half believe Israel was behind the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. Fortunately for us, Bin Laden and the Taliban are taking care of that theory. I think one of the few mistakes the Bush administration has made so far in this was to criticize the networks for putting on Bin Laden — we want everybody to hear him claim credit for those attacks

While some us search for the answer to the question, "Why do they hate us?" the voices on radio talk shows are answering, "Who cares? Nuke 'em." Those inclined to think that's not a bad plan might keep in mind the already-classic lede by Barry Bearak of The New York Times: "If there are American clamoring to bomb Afghanistan back to the Stone Age, they ought to know that this nation does not have far to go. This is a post-apocalyptic place of felled cities, parched land and downtrodden people." The major downside to the short-simple-answer school is that those folks are going to become extremely frustrated. As others have observed, talk radio is often not so much a forum for discussion as it is a medium for venting anger, so perhaps it serves a useful purpose.

In a continuing effort to focus on the practical, I see no reason not to lay out the evidence against Bin Laden. It's being leaked to the media so widely one can only assume that's a policy. The Taliban are now saying they will turn Bin Laden over to a third party if they see evidence: we don't want to negotiate, fine, we don't have to talk to them, we can just make the information public for everyone, with the exception, obviously, of shielding investigative tools. The money trail offers insights on the daunting complexity of what we face. Some of the charitable money we are questioning, from Saudi Arabia and elsewhere, goes to the madrasas, religious schools of varying quality. Some offer education, some educate solely for jihad: many of the Taliban are graduates of these schools. The madrasas, in addition to religious education, provide room and board for the boys of poor families. In Pakistan, where almost the entirety of the budget goes to the military and debt service, the madrasas represent almost the only opportunity for the poor. When experts talk about building a civil society, they mean almost from scratch — an education system, health care, everything. Nor is education the solution: in Egypt When schools offer turn, offer . . Al Jazeera

first intifada, 87 to 94, 1,067 pals 978 by pals for collaborating, 52 isli soldiers and 62 civs. Jerusalem Report. If there are am calmoring to bobm aghasintant back the stone age they ought to know that this nation does not have so far to go. This is a post apocalyptic place of felled cities, parched land and downtrodden people. If there are Ams lamosring to bomb Afg back to the Stone Age, they ought to know that this nation does not have so far to dol as of cotl5 664 paelstianinas and 175 israelis; 51 percentwith coopw. Am's, 21 oppose musharraf, 75 percetn opoose use of pak airfields., 64 percent say and attack of terrorism and 24 percent

To find out more about Molly Ivins and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2001 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.

u� AUSTIN —- Afghanistan is to nation-building what Afghanistan is to war — pretty much the last place on earth you'd choose, if you had any choice at all. V��H<.�&n�.�(n�0.�kV @�nP­@0;�N���

��*�������.��1��2��<��=��z��|��§������������„��������«��»��©����=��>��B��C��F��G��N��O��Q��R������F��G������O��P��������������O��P��d��e������������¶��©������«��»������,��-����µ�� ��

�� �� z�� {��!��!��!9��!:��!;��!<��!��!‚��!��!��!��!��!™��!��"a��"b��"|��"}��"��"��#��#��#^��#_��#��#�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������

�@�������b�������2��3������

��­��`����.������!;��%��'(™™™’™���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������!�h���!�h��� !�h���

!�h���!�h���!�h���!�h��������

��������I point this out not to oppose the idea, about which I think we have no choice, but to underline that the task is hard, long and incredibly complicated.

President Bush has said that from the beginning, but it cannot be said too often.

There are some signs of what could become a dangerous division in what has been an unusually unified America since this crisis began, and they have to do with a class difference in information. To oversimplify, those who are getting their information from the Internet and/or a broad range of publications are having conversations with one another that are radically different from those heard on many radio talk shows. This is more than the simplistic jingoism that is a constant in American life: this is simplistic jingoism with a dangerously short attention span. The "let's nuke 'em" crowd is still looking for a short, simple solution and there just isn't one. More stark evidence of this is the poll of Pakistanis just released by Newsweek, and the numbers need to be read carefully: while 51 percent support their government's cooperation with the U.S. during the crisis, 83 percent are sympathetic to the Taliban and almost half believe Israel was behind the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. Fortunately for us, bin Laden and the Taliban are taking care of that theory. I think one of the few mistakes the Bush administration has made so far in this was to criticize the networks for putting on bin Laden — we want everybody to hear him claim credit for those attacks.

While some us search for the answer to the question, "Why do they hate us?" the voices on radio talk shows are answering, "Who cares? Nuke 'em." Those inclined to think that's not a bad plan might keep in mind the already-classic lede by Barry Bearak of The New York Times: "If there are American clamoring to bomb Afghanistan back to the Stone Age, they ought to know that this nation does not have far to go. This is a post-apocalyptic place of felled cities, parched land and downtrodden people." One downside to the short-simple-answer school is that those folks are going to become extremely frustrated. As others have observed, talk radio is often not so much a forum for discussion as it is a medium for venting anger, so perhaps it serves a useful purpose. But it also seems to foment anger.

In a continuing effort to focus on the practical, I see no reason not to lay out the evidence against bin Laden. It's being leaked to the media so widely one can only assume that's a policy. The Taliban are now saying they will turn bin Laden over to a third party if they see evidence: we don't want to negotiate, fine, we don't have to talk to them, we can just make the information public for everyone, with the exception, obviously, of shielding investigative tools. The money trail offers insights on the daunting complexity of what we face. Some of the charitable money we are questioning, from Saudi Arabia and elsewhere, goes to the madrasas, religious schools of varying quality. Some offer education, some educate solely for jihad: many of the Taliban are graduates of these schools. The madrasas, in addition to religious education, provide room and board for the boys of poor families. In Pakistan, where almost the entirety of the budget goes to the military and debt service, the madrasas represent almost the whole of civil society for the poor. When experts talk about building a civil society, they mean from scratch.

While some of us are talking about how to build a civil society, achieve energy independence and settle long-standing international disputes, others are reacting like the waitress in an Austin drinking establishment, who refused to serve the East Indian guest of a regular patron, repeatedly called him a terrorist and insisted he leave. That's the reaction gap that concerns me.

;,W,of a. W? F. W;inging thats —�†���–��±��"����‚���„�����™�����›���action�align�alink�alt�at�attributes�background�behavior�bgcolor�bgproperties�border�bordercolor�bordercolordark�bordercolorlight��#��$U��$V��$‡��$��%`��%a��%��%��%��&›��&��'��'��''��'(��')��'*��'+��',��'/��'0��'3��'6��'9��':��'=��'E��'F��'I�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������†@��.������

��†P����@����������������2���3��†��­�� –��h������†�!��!��!��!��!��

!��������!��!��!������#��'I�

������'(� ����

�����U5‹—  

~°#*X*****/-/78889z:T:X:?

����H�H����(·’�FG(����H�H����(����d�������'��������������`���������������������������������=/­��­R����@������H�-:LaserWriter 8�

�����-���New York���Geneva���Monaco


Comments

0 Comments | Post Comment
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Molly Ivins
Jan. `09
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
28 29 30 31 1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 27 Feb 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 20 Feb 2012
Mark Levy
Mark LevyUpdated 18 Feb 2012

14 Mar 2000 Molly Ivins March 14

25 Oct 2005 Molly Ivins October 25

22 Jul 2004 Molly Ivins July 22