Molly Ivins August 25AUSTIN — Excuse me, but ... when did teachers become the enemy of education? Did I, like, have a stroke-ette and lose my short-term memory or something? Is it early onset Alzheimer's? Last time I checked, your basic teachers were still there — underpaid, overworked and suffering from what is fashionably called "lack of empowerment" — but still there. Imagine my surprise upon hearing Bob Dole attack teachers. Dole did specify that he was attacking teachers unions, not teachers, per se, but since teachers unions consist of teachers, represent teachers and do the bidding of teachers, that's a distinction without a difference. And what grave offense have the teachers committed, aside from supporting President Bill Clinton? Why, they do not favor school vouchers, and Mr. Dole does. And so, he condemns them, root and branch, and announces to the world that they're doing a terrible job — rotten, awful, horrible. If they were doctors, their patient would be dying, he said. When Republicans start condemning some public endeavor, it makes me nervous, as it usually precedes one of their efforts to dismantle whatever it is entirely — often under the guise of reform. One perforce perceives that the public schools are in some peril. You would scarcely believe the rhetoric that was applied to public schools at the San Diego rally. You would think every elementary school in the nation was a Blackboard Jungle of violence and drug use. That's odd, since the last time I checked, our kids' test scores were going up. The teachers I know are busy getting their classrooms ready, as always, spending their own money to buy the children books and dictionaries and paints and chalk. They're bringing in their own art posters and potted plants and goldfish. The teachers I know get more excited about the first day of school than little kids do. Al Shanker of the American Federation of Teachers, whose long record of concern for education is known to most Americans, observed last week that if an auto company — say, Ford — was getting its brains beaten out by Toyota, we wouldn't blame the United Auto Workers; we'd say, "Boy, is it ever time they shook up the management over there at Ford." Blaming the teachers for the problems in our schools is simply wrong and unfair. Having covered school systems in Houston, Dallas, Minneapolis, New York City and seven mountain states, I have reached a few (very few) conclusions about public schools. One is that we can't improve the public schools by taking money out of them and giving it to private schools. Sorry, that will not work. It is a bad idea. In fact, it's so profoundly dumb that I'm amazed to find apparently sensible people advocating it. What is it we would expect from a good private school? First of all, smaller classes.
This is precisely what we should expect of our public schools. Unfortunately, taking money away from them is not the way to achieve it. Since schoolteachers and their unions realize this, they consequently oppose the voucher plan. This does not make them enemies of education or even defenders of the status quo. One of the odd things about every problem associated with education is that someone somewhere has already solved it. Around this shining land, teachers are managing to interest inner-city kids in physics, getting bored little snots in the 'burbs excited about trigonometry and taking tough young punks and turning them into a literate basketball team. The problem has always been: How do you replicate success? One price we pay for the "local control" so beloved of prating politicians is that we don't replicate success. And if you follow school news, you already know that the effort to set national standards for our schools, started by President George Bush and called Goals 2000, is under attack by the right wing, who see in it some vile plot to take away local control. So, Salt Lake City's innovative school-choice plan (that's choice within the public school system), and Denver's brilliant response to working mothers, and the Midwestern experiment that recognizes artistic and athletic excellence along with academic success, and all the principal/campus-based experiments that seem so promising, remain in splendid isolation. In Texas, we can't even keep no-pass, no-play out of the busy hands of meddling legislators. My favorite example of local control was the time the Houston school board fell into the hands of some truly batty people. They called themselves Minutewomen and stood prepared to stave off Communist infiltrators, who were not in plentiful supply on the Texas Gulf Coast in the 1950s. One Minutewoman school board member shot her cop-husband, an uncommonly devilish twist. And remember when Dallas school board meetings were called the Monday Night Fights? Perhaps you have read about New York City's unfortunate experiment with local control, the community school boards that were not so much locally controlled as totally out of control. What I'm trying to suggest here is that the problem isn't the teachers — it's the management. What Dole is doing is like blaming the Internal Revenue Service for our screwy tax system (which he helped write so much of) and then saying that our screwy tax system would be better if we privatized the IRS. I do think it would be helpful if we were to dismantle most of the school administration structure. I've always wanted to bomb Livingstone Street, where New York City's school administration building sits. But perhaps that's a trifle inhumane. Padlocking it might do. *** Molly Ivins is a columnist for the Fort Worth Star-Telegram. COPYRIGHT 1996 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.
|
![]() |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]()
|
![]()
|






















