creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Molly Ivins
Molly Ivins
28 Jan 2009
What Would Molly Think?

JANUARY 31, 2009, IS THE TWO-YEAR ANNIVERSARY OF MOLLY IVINS' DEATH. THE FOLLOWING COLUMN WAS WRITTEN BY … Read More.

31 Jan 2007
Molly Ivins Tribute

MOLLY IVINS BEGAN WRITING HER SYNDICATED COLUMN FOR CREATORS SYNDICATE IN 1992. ANTHONY ZURCHER IS A CREATORS … Read More.

11 Jan 2007
Stand Up Against the Surge

The purpose of this old-fashioned newspaper crusade to stop the war is not to make George W. Bush look like … Read More.

Molly Ivins August 11

Share Comment

AUSTIN, Texas — The GOP, we are told, will use its convention to address the gender gap — the 20-point difference between men and women in their preference for President Clinton over Bob Dole, for Democrats over Republicans. To this end, the convention in San Diego will feature many female speakers, including the keynote speaker, Rep. Susan Molinari. We will watch many videos of actual American women — working moms, small-business women and homemakers — telling us why they're voting Republican. Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison will address us; we will see much of the attractive Elizabeth Dole and ranks of perfect Republican wives who always sit with their feet demurely crossed while listening to their husbands. (They teach cross-footed listening in Republican campaign school.)

Meanwhile, I am sitting here looking at this plank — the abortion plank in the Republican Party platform. It calls quite clearly for a constitutional amendment to outlaw abortion in all circumstances, including to save the life of the mother. Any doctor who performed an abortion, even to save the life of the mother, would be liable to criminal prosecution.

I think "not even to save the life of the mother" makes a stronger impression on me as to just what the Republican Party thinks of women, how much the party values women, than will the pretty videos to come.

Oddly enough (I have no idea how one would go about quantifying this), I think that a majority of the mothers I know would in fact sacrifice their own lives to save one of their children. It seems to be an automatic response in an emergency. I have seen a woman start to throw herself in front of an oncoming car to get a child out of the way; I have read reports of their lunging into raging rivers, etc. I know that mothers of terminally ill children often entreat God to take them instead. And I know women who have placed themselves in danger to help a child not even their own.

Still, it's not the same as a pregnancy gone disastrously wrong, is it? A child about to be hit by a car, a child trapped in a burning house, even a child being bitten by a dog or a wild animal — one responds without thinking.

There is time to think when a pregnancy has gone wrong. To think of one's older children who need a mother. To think of other children whom one might have or adopt in the future. To think of one's other obligations in life. To think of the sweetness and challenges of one's own life.

When women have miscarriages, we mourn — sometimes bitterly and grievously. But it is not the same as losing a child, is it? "Not even to save the life of the mother." That seems to me so presumptuous — the Republican Party (actually, just a minority of the Republican Party) playing God. Playing God with supreme self-righteousness, on the grounds that they alone speak for God.

The party that just finished laying plans to cut $55 billion out of programs to help poor children. The party that opposed a modest increase in the minimum wage so working parents can care for their children. What kind of Christians are these?

There's an old blues song, "When the Hunter Gets Captured By the Game," that describes the Republican Party at present. The game that the party went out to seek was the Christian right — a mother lode of zealous anti-abortion, anti-gay, religiously inspired political activists. The Republicans have used these people through five election cycles, exploiting their fervor without doing much that they wanted. But now the game has captured them.

Their platform brings back everything short of the flat-earth theory. Voodoo economics is back, social policies based on Darwinism are back (odd for a party that isn't quite sure about the theory of evolution), and strange references to the United Nations keep creeping in. I can't figure out whether this is the old John Birch Society U.N.-phobia or the new militia-inspired black-helicopter conspiracy theory. It's all over the Texas Republican platform.

This platform is like King Midas in reverse. Everything it touches turns to sludge. I guess the good news is that no one pays much attention to party platforms.

Never underestimate the perverse power of spinners. Last time I checked Bill Safire's column, he was planning to reinvent Dole as a populist. That's Bob Dole, lifelong servant of the corporate and financial elites, who flies around in the Archer-Daniels-Midland jet.

My friends, our eyes will yet witness unimaginable wonders. Life on Mars. Bob Dole as the friend of the Little Man.

***

Molly Ivins is a columnist for the Fort Worth Star-Telegram.

COPYRIGHT 1996 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.


Comments

0 Comments | Post Comment
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Molly Ivins
Jan. `09
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
28 29 30 31 1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25 26 27 28 29 30 31
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 27 Feb 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 20 Feb 2012
Mark Levy
Mark LevyUpdated 18 Feb 2012

26 Apr 2005 Molly Ivins April 26

17 Nov 1998 Molly Ivins November 17

4 Feb 2003 Molly Ivins February 4