opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Miguel Perez
Miguel Perez
18 Aug 2015
Finding Dad in a Museum

There I was, on my Great Hispanic American History Tour, visiting yet one more gallery where our heritage is … Read More.

10 Jun 2015
Smithsonian Omits Hispanics in US History Exhibit

On the broad streets of Washington, D.C., and within the majestic halls of the U.S. Capitol, our often-hidden … Read More.

22 Apr 2015
Searching for Not-So-Hidden Hispanic Heritage in Washington, DC

When we go to our nation's capital, mostly as tourists trying to make time to cover all the major attractions,… Read More.

Who's on Trial, Sotomayor or Republicans?


When I dared to suggest that Sonia Sotomayor could be a shoo-in for a Supreme Court nomination — three weeks before President Barack Obama actually picked her — some people told me I had gone too far out on a limb.

"Estás loco," some of my friends told me. They said that my longing for Hispanic representation on the high court had distorted my sense of reality. Some said I was dreaming, and others called me delusional.

Frankly, I still think it was an easy call. When Obama and other members of his administration spoke of the qualities they sought in their first Supreme Court nominee — excellence, integrity, respect for the rule of law, and real-life experiences that make her a better judge — to me, it seemed as if they were painting a picture of Sotomayor.

The fact that she is a Latina is not a qualification, I wrote, but it's certainly icing on the cake, especially because she would help balance the current court's lopsided 8-1 gender scale and add some ethnic diversity to what has been predominantly a white men's club. Seeing as 106 white men, two white women and two black men had been seated throughout the court's history, it seemed as if the "Corte Suprema" was more than overdue for a Latina.

Nevertheless, suggesting that a Puerto Rican woman from the projects of the Bronx, N.Y., could suddenly become one of the country's most influential people was too much wishful thinking, even for many Latinos who wanted to see it happen.

"Five years ago, if you would have asked me what had a better chance of becoming reality — finding life on Mars or having a black president appoint a Puerto Rican woman to the Supreme Court — I would have picked life on Mars," one of my friends told me after Obama nominated Sotomayor last week. This particular friend, journalist Elaine Rivera, a Puerto Rican woman who lives in the South Bronx, also said, "Now it feels like we are living in a dream."

In the Hispanic community, Sotomayor's nomination can be equated with that wonderful elation felt by many African-Americans when Obama was elected president. Across the country, Latinos are telling their children, "Sí, se puede," because they, too, can grow up to become justices of the Supreme Court of the United States.

And just as Latinos are beginning to enjoy this moment of pride and euphoria, just as they are beginning to realize what previously was only a dream, some very hateful people who claim to speak for the Republican Party are turning the whole thing into a nightmare.

In spite of Sotomayor's vast experience and brilliant career, some Republican flamethrowers are implying that she was picked only because she is a Latina, as if no Hispanic could get that job if the selection were based purely on intellect.

Even if they don't mean it as an insult, that's the effect!

Clinging to a few misspoken words by Sotomayor, right-wing extremists, such as Newt Gingrich and Rush Limbaugh, already are branding the judge as a racist.

Amazingly, these are the same people who don't like to be called racists — the ones who claim that civil discourse cannot be had if the left always is accusing them of racism.

Yet now look at who is playing the race card!

Is Sotomayor an activist judge or a judge who recognizes that her life experiences affect her decisions? That's a legitimate debate. Is she going to tilt the balance of the court? Even that question, although problematic, has become acceptable.

What is not acceptable and, frankly, repulsive is the effort to turn Sotomayor into a reverse racist — all because of her choice of words during a 2001 speech at the University of California, Berkeley, in which she noted that "a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life."

Even when they purposely ignore the rest of her speech and decide to take that sentence totally out of context — as many obviously have — most rational Americans can see that, as the president said Friday, "what's clear is that she was simply saying that her life experiences will give her information about the struggles and hardships that people are going through, that will make her a good judge."

But the Republican leadership in Congress — instead of strongly condemning the outrageous diatribes of those who claim to speak for the party — simply is saying that Gingrich and Limbaugh are not elected officials. It's not enough!

Imagine how Latino Republicans must feel when they hear the GOP zealots suggesting that their party doesn't need the Hispanic vote? Could this lead to massive desertions? Possibly. Stay tuned for the Senate confirmation hearings!

The tone of the dialogue is getting so nasty that many in the Spanish news media rightfully are asking whether the Republican Party is on the verge of self-destructing.

Certainly in the Hispanic community, after the damage GOP zealots have done to their party over the issue of immigration, the Sotomayor nomination could represent the last nail on the Republicans' coffin. When we watch the upcoming confirmation hearings, it will be Republicans, not Sotomayor, who will be on trial.

To find out more about Miguel Perez and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at



4 Comments | Post Comment
I wonder what Mr. Perez thinks of the treatment that the Democrats gave Miguel Estrada 2 years ago. President Bush nominated Mr. Estrada to a lower court, but always with the vision of letting him work up to the Supreme Court. Mr. Estrada also had a very good story of his struggles, and achievements, he's a very smart and an experienced judge, he had all the qualifications, yet the Democrats waved a battle against him , one of the reasons was because he was a Latino. Does it only count when you're a left wing Democrat Latino?
Comment: #1
Posted by: Tily
Wed Jun 3, 2009 3:29 PM
Sotomayor is NOT a racist? Is that why she is a member of LA RAZA? Perhaps you are only a racist when you are a white male talking about any other race. When people have banished the white male who will they rebel against next? Why is it not racist to be against Attorney General Gonzalez or Justice Thomas? You really need to get it together before you write these columns.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Donna Garcia
Mon Jun 8, 2009 10:26 AM
I surely am very disappointed in you Mr. Perez, you are one of my faviorte panelists at Lou Dobbs. I have heard your statement on journalism in this country and in a word you have said it is dead. According to you the media/written news has such a bias towards Obama they can't be considered jounalist anymore. They don't hold his feet to the fire, you said. Yet a couple of weeks ago I here you make a statement on Lou Dobbs that Sotomayor is to hispanics what Obama is to African Americans. I guess I'm to interpret that, as a hispanic you aren't going to judge this lady the same way you would judge any other Supreme Court Nominee? Will she get an automatic pass from you, should she? By the way, the statement she made about a Latino women coming to a better conclusion than a older white male wasn't made just once according to what I'm hearing it looks like about 8 times now. I would say that is more than just, she miss spoke.
Mr. Perez how do you feel about the Constitution and the Bill of Rights? Perhaps you might want to check out where she stands on the right to bear arms issue and the abortion issue. According to one Senator she was unwilling to say the second amendment protects a fundamental right that applies to all Americans. Sotomayor is a Catholic but says she doesn't share the Churches commitment to protect the unborn. When further questioned by the Senator if the unborn have any rights whatsoever, her answer, she had never thought about it! Really, and you wonder why the GOP is concerned. I'm concerned as a Conservative about these issues. I wonder where she stands on the Fairness Doctrine you know that silly little thing we Conservatives call Free Speech. I'm sure you are interested in that since you have many times commented on Castro's Cuba and his people in prison for life because they spoke out. To trot out the race card to intimidate the GOP is exactly what's happening here, you do know where Conservatives stand on issues and she doesn't stand in that same corner so they are worried about these ISSUES Mr. Perez. Please don't disappoint a fan that thinks a great deal about you and your opinions, don't make this about race, it's beneath you!
Comment: #3
Posted by: Linda
Fri Jun 12, 2009 9:40 AM
Did not Sotomoyer say she was appointed because of affirmative action! She stated there were others more qualified than she was, but she was a recipient of affirmative action bias even though she was born in the U.S. Imagine your outrage at a KKK member seeking a seat on the court - KKK is no different than "La Raza". Bigots come in all genders, colors, and ethnicities. Perhaps she should open a Taco stand or am I being a bit racist???
Ed Filardo
Comment: #4
Posted by: Ed Filardo
Sun Jul 5, 2009 3:16 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right: comments policy
Miguel Perez
Aug. `15
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
26 27 28 29 30 31 1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31 1 2 3 4 5
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 8 Feb 2016
Deb Saunders
Debra J. SaundersUpdated 7 Feb 2016
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 7 Feb 2016

22 Jan 2008 Watching Hugo Go Crazy

9 Nov 2011 Death of Democracy in Nicaragua

4 Mar 2013 Cabinet-Level (Con) Jobs