creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Miguel Perez
Miguel Perez
30 Sep 2014
A River Runs Through Our Hispanic Heritage

When the United States and Mexico agreed to designate a large portion of the Rio Grande as the international … Read More.

23 Sep 2014
The World's Biggest Statue of a Nameless Horseback Rider

It is, by all accounts, "the world's biggest equestrian statue" — so big that it's meant to be seen … Read More.

16 Sep 2014
The First Thanksgiving in the (Southwest) United States

When you get to San Elizario, Texas, in a part of the country that bears little resemblance to Plymouth, Massachusetts,… Read More.

Romney: The DREAM Latino Unifier

Comment

In our public schools, we taught them to be civic minded and to exercise their rights as Americans. There were no separate courses where young undocumented immigrants could learn how to be submissive second-class citizens. When they learned about Martin Luther King's dream, they felt they had the right to dream that way, too.

So let's not be surprised when we see them getting involved in the political process and speaking bluntly when they confront politicians. We taught them that marching, protesting and demonstrating for our civil rights is the American way. And they are about to show us how well they learned that lesson!

All over the country, without even national coordination, young undocumented immigrants already are confronting the presidential candidates who would deny them of their dream of going to college and becoming productive members of our society.

They are about to make the Development Relief Education Alien Minors Act a huge issue in the presidential race. The DREAM Act is the controversial legislation that would legalize young undocumented immigrants who were brought here as children if they attend at least two years of college or join the military. It's an issue that will demonstrate the clear difference between President Barack Obama and whomever turns out to be his Republican opponent.

While Obama has continuously urged Congress to pass the DREAM Act, his leading opponent, Mitt Romney, has vowed to veto it. Instead, while pandering to Latinos in Florida, Romney and Newt Gingrich proposed a military-only DREAM Act — another clear demonstration of their lack of compassion for these young people who consider themselves Americans and should not be treated differently.

In his blatant pandering to right-wing extremists in the first few GOP primaries, Romney went out of his way not only to oppose comprehensive immigration reform but even the light version of that reform.

"I absolutely believe that those who come here illegally should not be given favoritism or a special route to becoming permanent residents or citizens that's not given to those people who have stayed in line legally," Romney said in one of the GOP debates. "... I have indicated I would veto the DREAM Act if provisions included in that act to say that people who are here illegally, if they go to school here long enough, get a degree here that they can become permanent residents. I think that's a mistake. I think we have to follow the law and insist those who come here illegally, ultimately return home, apply and get in line with everyone else."

I say the mistake is Romney's failure to appreciate how such an extremist position would backfire on him in the general election. I say he chose the wrong issue to prove to right-wing extremists that he is really a conservative, especially since it hasn't worked. Knowing that he has flip-flopped on this issue, Conservatives still are reluctant to embrace him and Latinos are more motivated to vote against him.

Until now, politicians who oppose the DREAM Act have been somewhat sheltered by demographics.

They usually come from districts where Latinos and other pro-immigrant voters still are a small minority. While immigrant rights advocates have demonstrated that they can organize huge demonstrations in major U.S. cities, demographics have made it much more difficult for them to demonstrate their political strength.

But things are totally different now. With an anti-immigrant extremist like Romney leading the GOP race for president, now activists who support the DREAM Act will have one distinct DREAM target. The time has come for them to go beyond shouting "Si Se Puede — Yes We Can" and to turn those words into a political movement.

And it's already happening! In New York City, DREAM Act activists shouted "Veto Romney" as the former Massachusetts governor headed for a campaign fundraiser. In Nevada, the "dreamers" organized a rally just in time for the GOP primary. In Miami, activists greeted the Romney campaign bus shouting "education not deportation" and three of them interrupted a Romney stump speech shouting, "Why are you trying to separate our families?"

After delivering a victory speech for winning the New Hampshire primary, Romney was reportedly approached by several DREAM Act activists. "I love this country. I'm a dreamer. I want you to support the DREAM Act, sir," one man reportedly told him. To which Romney dismissively responded, "Fine, thank you," and moved on.

Perhaps the most dramatic encounter came when a young Latina shook Romney's hand outside a New York hotel, identified herself as an undocumented immigrant and asked Romney, "Why aren't you supporting my dream?"

That young woman, Lucy Allain, later told reporters that Romney pulled his hand away when she revealed her immigration status, "as if I were a criminal."

Let's face it: By making an anti-immigrant extremist like Romney the frontrunner and likely-GOP nominee, by selecting the one who has gone father to the right on immigration than any of his already-draconian GOP opponents, the one who wants to make conditions so miserable that immigrants will have to "self-deport," Republicans are giving Latinos and immigrant rights activists a unifying opponent.

President Obama deported more immigrants than any other president and failed to deliver on his promise to get Congress to pass comprehensive immigration reform. But compared to Romney, who would clearly make life much more miserable for immigrants, the choice is easy.

Even Rep. Luis Gutierrez, who has been an outspoken critic of Obama on immigration, had to acknowledge last week that between Obama and Romney, there is no comparison. "There is no route to the White House that does not go through a Latino neighborhood. Any winner in either party needs a significant proportion of Latino voters," Gutierrez told reporters on a conference call. "When you say you want millions of us to leave the country ... we will vote against you."

It's true. Instead of voting enthusiastically for Obama because he failed to fulfill our immigration dreams, Latinos will instead have no choice but to vote against Romney, who has vowed to turn our dreams into nightmares.

To find out more about Miguel Perez and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2012 CREATORS.COM



Comments

3 Comments | Post Comment
"an anti-immigrant extremist like Romney leading the GOP race for president"
Did he say to throw all immigrants out? Did he say to end all immigration? Did he say to round up all immigrants and put them into concentration camps? Does he have a history of legal anti-immigrant positions or policies? Ah, I'm no fan of Romney, but how is expecting immigrants to follow the law 'anti-immigrant extremist'?
With a few modifications I think the dream act could work for the betterment of everybody but it cannot and should not reward illegal behavior or put people who have circumvented the law above, or at the expense of, those who do follow the law. Is that ‘extreme' and against ALL immigration?
Comment: #1
Posted by: GottaRide
Wed Feb 8, 2012 1:27 PM
Being of Italian descent, I understand immigrants coming to America for a better life. I am in no way "extreme anti-immigration"....but it doesn't make sense to me that my US-born child might not be accepted into a college because places are being taken by students who are not legal citizens of this country. I don't understand why tuition-assistance would be granted to those who are not legal citizens of this country, while my US-born citizen could be denied. In the good ol' USA, it should be our responsibility to educate the children of THIS country - be it a natural born citizen, permanent resident, or naturalized citizen. Because I want my US-born child to receive education BEFORE anyone that is not legally in the US, it doesn't mean I'm anti immigration...it means there are priorities for citizens in THIS country before others. This is common sense, not anti-anything.
Comment: #2
Posted by: CommonSenseMom
Thu Feb 9, 2012 6:09 AM
Illegal behavior? The Rule of Law! Shocking! As Forest Gump would say, the Rule of Law is as the Rule of Law does.
If you don't want so many illegals here, then make more of them legal. And then that would be the Rule of Law. Romney talking about "self deportation" is delusional and claiming that how you are not against immigrants because you are in favor of "other people" getting visas won't cut mustard for Romney this year.
We've been here before. In 1850 Congress passed two controversial pro-slavery laws: he Compromise of 1850 and the Fugitive Slave Act - These laws made it possible that Slavery could extend further West, while the most noxious Fugitive Slave Act directed ordinary citizens to cooperate with slave owners trying to get their escaped slaves back from the Northern states where they had established lives as free men and women. Then another pro-Slavery law, the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 set in motion the Kansas bloodbath and ended badly. Some laws deserve little respect.
That was the rule of law, then, the 1850s version of Arizona's recent laws. Some congressmen even scheme to take away some American citizenship away from their American children. Wanting to create second class Americans apparently has more lives than the Terminator. I thought we had settled that after a bloody war and the 14th Amendment.
Let's not get carried away with indignation that the illegals came here illegally. That's tautological tripping. Entering the US illegally is a misdemeanor punishable by six months for the first conviction under 8 USC 1325 (Improper entry by alien), like other misdemeanors like driving while intoxicated,etc. It's not a capital crime to be punished on later generations. Give the new Americans a chance.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Gus Malanga
Thu Feb 9, 2012 10:47 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Miguel Perez
Sep. `14
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 1 2 3 4
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Susan EstrichUpdated 1 Oct 2014
Jim Hightower
Jim HightowerUpdated 1 Oct 2014
John Stossel
John StosselUpdated 1 Oct 2014

13 Sep 2011 Undermining Democracy

17 Jul 2007 As McCain Slips, Latinos Lose Leverage

5 Jun 2007 Venezuela Unplugs Opposition TV