creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Miguel Perez
Miguel Perez
14 Feb 2012
Eye-Opener for Diehard Latino Republicans

Just when we think there is nothing more Republicans can do to alienate themselves from Latino voters, when … Read More.

7 Feb 2012
Romney: The DREAM Latino Unifier

In our public schools, we taught them to be civic minded and to exercise their rights as Americans. There … Read More.

31 Jan 2012
Snake Oil Peddlers

It takes a lot of gall to defend either Newt Gingrich or Mitt Romney in the Hispanic community nowadays. And yet,… Read More.

Obama's Election Didn't Cure Racism

Share Comment

Remember when, just a few weeks ago, we thought the election of Barack Obama had dealt a major blow against racism in this country, when we temporarily were swept by a tidal wave of interracial harmony? Remember how some people were actually naive enough to assume that racism was over?

Well, now it turns out that Obama's victory has ignited a series of hate crimes against blacks and other ethnic minorities, especially Latinos.

Since the Nov. 4 election, there have been hundreds of incidents of abuse or intimidation apparently motivated by racial hatred, according to representatives of seven civil rights organizations who held a news conference in Washington to denounce the abuses. Some compared the recent surge in racial incidents to the rise in discrimination against Muslims after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11.

"We've seen everything from cross burnings on lawns of interracial couples to effigies of Obama hanging from nooses to unpleasant exchanges in schoolyards," said Mark Potok, director of the Alabama-based Intelligence Project at the Southern Poverty Law Center.

All the election proved is that obviously the majority of Americans are not racists. And that's not just counting those who voted for Obama, because surely there are many Americans who are not racists and voted for Sen. John McCain.

But the small minority of people who suffer from this terrible ailment — those who are consumed by racial or ethnic hatred — are not getting any better. The election didn't cure them. In fact, now there is evidence that Obama's election actually worsened their mean-spirited condition.

"In the wake of an election that sends a message to the world about freedom, it seems incongruous to raise the specter of hate in America," Janet Murguia, president and CEO of the National Council of La Raza, told reporters. "Hate did not win the election, but it has certainly reared its head in local communities across the country."

It started on election night, when two teenagers assaulted a black man on Staten Island, N.Y., as they shouted racial epithets about Obama. A few days later, a New Jersey family who supported Obama found a charred wooden cross on their lawn — a painful reminder of the intimidation tactics used by the Ku Klux Klan against African-Americans. KKK graffiti appeared along a popular walking and bicycling trail in Hallowell, Maine.

The list of these unfortunate incidents is long.

Perhaps the most blatant act of racism recently was the one committed Nov. 8 on New York's Long Island. That's where Ecuadorian Marcelo Lucero was stabbed to death — all because a group of seven youths was allegedly on a quest to hunt down and attack Latinos. Calling it a hate crime, police have charged one teenager with murder and six others with lesser crimes.

While these incidents can be attributed to resentment against Obama's election when blacks are the victims, some say the increased violence against other ethnic minorities can be blamed on the anti-immigrant climate of the recent past. They say that for immigrants who have fallen victim to discrimination, this is not a new, postelection trend but one that goes back a few years. While the total number of hate crimes reported nationally between 2003 and 2007 remained steady, according to FBI statistics, attacks on Latinos grew by 40 percent during the same time period.

"The hysterical tone of many of the media pundits and the harsh qualities of rhetoric pushed by some policymakers at a local level have created a toxic environment which is promoting violence against immigrants and immigrant communities," said Karen Narasaki of the Asian American Justice Center.

Amazingly, we are seeing a surge in not only hate crimes but also membership applications in far-right and white-supremacist groups. Obama's election reportedly has given new life to extremist groups, including the KKK, which has begun to resurface after many years of obscurity.

"I think we're in a worrying situation right now, a perfect storm of conditions coming together that could easily favor the continued growth of these groups," said Potok, whose organization monitors extremist groups.

"We have seen a fairly dramatic backlash over the last three or four weeks, since the final weeks of the campaign," Potok told a Reuters reporter. "These (incidents) are merely gut-level reactions from a lot of people. … There is a substantial subset of white people in America who are boiling angry over this."

Yet given the fact that we live in a democracy and that Obama was elected by an impressive majority of the American people, what should we call those who refuse to accept the fact that a black family is moving into the White House?

Un-American? Is that an accurate way to describe the white-supremacist extremists who would turn this country into Nazi Germany?

Of course it is! But we've known that all along, haven't we?

Unfortunately, electing Obama was not enough to cure their chronic racism.

To find out more about Miguel Perez and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.


Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment
Mr. Perez,
Your recent article on an alleged surge in hate crimes since the November 4 election is inaccurate and misleading.

Most of the text has been taken, almost verbatim, from a recent press release issued by the Southern Poverty Law Center's (SPLC) public relations chief, Mark Potok. Not only is this lazy journalism, Mr. Perez, it perpetuates a number of half-truths and falsehoods from an organization that has a documented financial interest in exploiting the public's fear.

You make the comment that Mr. Obama's victory "...has ignited a series of hate crimes against blacks and other ethnic minorities, especially Latinos," and yet you don't cite a single incident that links an attack on Hispanics to Obama's election. Where is this "special" connection?

Nor is there any evidence that the number of hate crimes against minorities is significantly greater now than it was before the election. In addition, you imply that all hate crimes against minorities are perpetrated by Whites, which is also untrue. You cite the November 8 murder of Marcelo Lucero as the "most blatant act of racism recently" while completely ignoring the December 7 attack and murder of another Ecuadorian immigrant, Romel Sucuzhanay at the hands of four blacks in Brooklyn.

Apparently, the attack on the Sucuzhanay brothers, while more recent, doesn't fit your preconceived notion that Whites somehow hold a monopoly on hate. Even the mainstream media are hard pressed to identify such a blatant act for what it is. Most outlets are hiding behind the euphemism "bias attack" instead of calling it out for the hate crime that it is. If the brothers had not been mistaken for gays the press would have written it off as just another black on brown attack; an everyday occurrence in the Big Apple.

As for Mr. Potok and the SPLC, his organization is a self-proclaimed "watch dog" group that has no mandate and receives no external review or regulation. An individual or group makes the SPLC's hate list solely at the whim of the group's founder, Morris Dees, a millionaire lawyer who successfully represented the Klan in the 1960s against charges of attacking Freedom Riders in Alabama. In his autobiography, Mr. Dees states that he was only in it for the money. (Dees, Morris. (1991). A season for justice: The life and times of civil rights lawyer Morris Dees. Pp 84-85)

Among those Mr. Dees designates as "hate groups" are writers, publishers, church groups and "radical traditionalist Catholics," groups to which many Latinos, including yourself, may belong. (http://www.splcenter.org/intel/map/type.jsp?DT=30).

The SPLC is one of the richest non-profit organizations in the country. Currently it sits on an "Endowment Fund" worth more than $200 million dollars and will add another $25 to $30 million tax-free dollars to that pot this year. Considering that the SPLC spent only $7 million in "legal costs" in 2007, such a fund would allow the group to operate for more than twenty years without raising another dime. (Page 14, http://www.splcenter.org/pdf/static/SPLC_AR07.pdf)

Due to these huge cash reserves, the American Institute of Philanthropy gives the SPLC a rating grade of "F" and the Better Business Bureau no longer accredits them as a charity due to "...a lack of commitment to transparency." (http://us.bbb.org/WWWRoot/SitePage.aspx?site=113&id=5fe39041-face-4ffb-8551-1ace558f9082)

The SPLC relies on a campaign of fear and misinformation, such as the press release from which you quote so heavily, to frighten donors, many of whom are elderly, into keeping the donations rolling in. Despite the fact that Morris Dees was a multimillionaire the day he opened the SPLC in 1971, he still sees fit to compensate himself to the tune of more than $330,000 dollars a year from the SPLC's coffers. PR Chief Mark Potok, who has no legal background, is compensated with nearly $140,000 a year from the same donation pot. Obviously, both men have a definite financial stake in exaggerating the number of hate groups and incidents in the United States. (Pages 10 and 26, http://www.splcenter.org/pdf/static/SPLC990_2006.pdf)

You even go so far as to quote Mr. Potok's embarrassing statement about "...unpleasant exchanges in schoolyards." The incident which has drawn Mr. Potok's ire refers to a 9 year old third grader who made threatening comments about Mr. Obama. As any parent can tell you, 9 year olds make immature and childish remarks precisely because they are children and immature. Should we start rounding up grade schoolers for the gulag and nip this in the bud? Mr. Potok, who has no children, must be pretty desperate to pad out his list of "evidence" if this is the best he can do.

In conclusion, Mr. Perez, no one can deny that there is much hate in this country, but sadly there are many people of all races and creeds who twist the facts for their own political and financial ends. Hate mongers such as the SPLC and the other alphabet soup organizations use fear to dupe millions of good hearted, well meaning people, also of all races and creeds, into sending in their hard earned money. Others, and I'm sure you know the type, Mr. Perez, need to examine their own bigotry and prejudices before attacking entire groups, even if those groups happen to be White.

Richard Keefe
Comment: #1
Posted by: Rkeefe
Fri Dec 12, 2008 6:53 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Miguel Perez
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Judge Napolitano
Judge Andrew P. NapolitanoUpdated 16 Feb 2012
Austin Bay
Austin BayUpdated 15 Feb 2012
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 15 Feb 2012

9 Oct 2007 Bordering on Racism

2 Mar 2010 His Death Has Many Culprits

19 Jul 2011 A Long-Overdue Museum