creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Miguel Perez
Miguel Perez
14 Feb 2012
Eye-Opener for Diehard Latino Republicans

Just when we think there is nothing more Republicans can do to alienate themselves from Latino voters, when … Read More.

7 Feb 2012
Romney: The DREAM Latino Unifier

In our public schools, we taught them to be civic minded and to exercise their rights as Americans. There … Read More.

31 Jan 2012
Snake Oil Peddlers

It takes a lot of gall to defend either Newt Gingrich or Mitt Romney in the Hispanic community nowadays. And yet,… Read More.

Obama and McCain Are Making Me Punch Myself!

Share Comment
Sen. Barack Obama challenges America to learn how to speak Spanish, and Sen. John McCain challenges Obama to deal with Latin America -- and my dual national personalities, Miguel and Michael, are fighting again. I'm at war with myself!

As a Cuban-American, I suffer from what I call a "split-nationality syndrome," a condition that affects me, as well as many other hyphenated Americans, mostly during presidential elections and international sports competitions. It's probably the main reason I always have been an independent voter.

Miguel, the Cuban in me, wants to remain loyal to the Republican Party, not because it has done anything special to free Cuba from almost five decades of Communist repression, but because -- from the Bay of Pigs to Elian Gonzalez -- Cuban-Americans have been betrayed too many times by the Democrats.

Yet Michael, the American in me, has other priorities that transcend past loyalties. As a Latino who has lived in this country five times longer than in Cuba, Michael, like many other Latino-Americans, wants to remain loyal to the Democratic Party, not because it has done anything special to advance immigration reform, education, health care, the economy or the many other domestic issues that concern my community, but because many Republicans have practiced the politics of instilling xenophobia and thus have stood in the way of my civil rights. For Michael, it's payback time!

Needless to say, Miguel wants to vote for McCain, and Michael says Obama is "the man."

If there were any doubt in Miguel's mind, Obama disqualified himself early. The moment Obama said, in a debate with Sen. Hillary Clinton, that he would meet with Cuba's dictator-to-be, Raul Castro, "without preconditions," Miguel gave up on Obama. You don't negotiate with despots who should be tried for genocide!

Michael argues that Obama would be good for U.S. Latinos because Obama promises to fight for comprehensive immigration reform within his first year in the Oval Office and because, as an African-American, Obama seems to jive better with Latinos on domestic issues, such as the economy, education and health care. Michael recognizes that McCain has been an ally of Latinos in the fight to legalize the 12 million undocumented immigrants in the country but notes that the right wing of McCain's party never will let McCain be McCain on this issue.

Miguel argues that for the 12 million illegal immigrants in this country, McCain is the only hope because in order get their legalization through Congress, the borders have to be secured first, which is what McCain is promising to do.

Miguel argues for other issues that should favor McCain among Latinos, especially Obama's opposition to the free trade agreement with Colombia and the reluctance by Democrats in Congress to support U.S. assistance to Mexico's war on drug cartels.

When McCain went to Colombia and Mexico recently -- and some naive American pundits were laughing and questioning how many votes he was going to get south of the border -- there were many U.S. Colombians, Mexicans and other Latinos who were shouting at their TV sets, "How about my vote, stupid?" Those who failed to see the significance of McCain visiting the Virgin of Guadalupe simply are culturally challenged and not politically astute.

Miguel likes to tell that story. Michael hates it.

During the past few days, as Obama and McCain spoke before the national conventions of a couple of large Hispanic civil rights organizations, many Latinos have gone through the mentally agonizing symptoms of the "split-nationality syndrome" -- just as Irish, Jewish, Polish or any other hyphenated Americans do when our politicians speak to their organizations about their community issues and U.S. relations with the rest of the world. When they do it for Latinos, some people call it pandering. Not fair. It has been that way throughout the history of this "nation of immigrants."

Based on those speeches, many Americans will end up choosing between the candidate who represents the best interests of their people, either here or abroad. And in the race between McCain and Obama, this is not only true for Latinos but also for many other hyphenated Americans.

If that weren't enough, the Olympic Games are coming. This is when Miguel roots for Cuba, Michael roots for the USA, and many other hyphenated Americans will be suffering the worst symptoms of the "split-nationality syndrome."

During the boxing matches, I will try not to punch myself. And on Election Day, I will let Miguel and Michael race to the voting booth.

To find out more about Miguel Perez and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.
COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.


Comments

4 Comments | Post Comment
Where did this notion of voting for the guy who's going to do the most for me and my favorite subset of the population come from? What about the business of electing the candidate who is going to look out for the best interests of the country as a whole? (On that topic, can you explain to me how "pardoning" 12 million illegal aliens is in the best interest of the US? Perhaps when we do that, we can also refund all the money paid to the US government, and give tax credits for fees paid to lawyers by legal immigrants, and then top that off by apologizing to them for letting the illegals cut in line ahead of them.) I recognize that in this election, those of us who have the interests of the whole country at heart will have to settle for the best foreign policy, but that's something, at least. I hope Miguel wins the race to the poll.
Comment: #1
Posted by: davd w pennington
Tue Jul 15, 2008 2:02 PM
How absurd for you to say that Europeans showing enthusiasm for Obama will turn American voters off. You think that after Bush has made us the mmost despised, disdained and vilified nation in the world, we are going to be turned off by people like the French warming to an American politician? Pure, unadulterated bullshit.
Comment: #2
Posted by: tom werman
Sun Jul 20, 2008 5:07 PM
I can truly identify with Miguel Perez in all of his articles. The article about his dual identity American (Michael) and Latino (Miguel) definitely hits home. The question is legitimate, I ask myself whether I should sign this comment with my American name R. Angelica Redpath hyphened Perez or use my true Latino name Rosaura Angelica Perez Espaillat de Redpath. Just recently I have been debating with myself whether to change my x-husband's name with my maiden name and never change it again even if I re-marry. But then again it is rather nice to be in cloak and pass as an American with my ex.'s name Redpath; it is a true advantage—you'd be surprised at what Americans say about those people. Have I become a sort of Latino spy, a witness to bigotry expressed in round perfect tones by respected members of our society? People are shocked when I repeat out load for all to hear the nastiness that came out of their mouths.

I must confess with the name Redpath most people ask me if I am American Indian, shouldn't it be Native American? The name Redpath is actually Scottish. It is important to note that most of the times I can get away with swapping heritage syndrome and camouflage as a true American? Aren't the true Americans Native Americans? Question, if one is from South America isn't that person an American too? Anyway…But then again sometimes people ask are you Italian-American? That is when I say wow; they think I am European American? Should I feel proud to be impersonating an American or sad because I feel the need to be in disguise or is it a shield? So the question is whether I should be a moth or turn into a multi colored butterfly that uses such colors to her advantage? Isn't that the American way?

By the way the Microsoft spell check for this article prompted me to change Rosaura to Rosaria, and it also does not accepts the accents on Perez or Angelica—it categorizes these as incorrect. I will leave the accents on the letters for now, it gives the name character….funny even Microsoft chose not to include common Latino names with their accents in the spell check; typical.

P.S. When I previewed this article, I had to remove the accents on Perez and Angelica because they show up as é that is hilarious.;)))))))
Comment: #3
Posted by: R. Angelica Perez Espaillat
Fri Aug 15, 2008 8:28 AM
By the way R. Angelica Perez Espaillat will go to the poll.
Comment: #4
Posted by: R. Angelica Perez Espaillat
Fri Aug 15, 2008 8:37 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Miguel Perez
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Lawrence Kudlow
Lawrence KudlowUpdated 16 Feb 2012
Judge Napolitano
Judge Andrew P. NapolitanoUpdated 16 Feb 2012
Joe Conason
Joe ConasonUpdated 16 Feb 2012

29 Nov 2011 With Amigos Like Gingrich, Who Needs Enemigos?

10 Jul 2007 A Narrowing Field of Candidatos

22 Dec 2009 The Amnesty To End All Amnesties