creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Miguel Perez
Miguel Perez
14 Feb 2012
Eye-Opener for Diehard Latino Republicans

Just when we think there is nothing more Republicans can do to alienate themselves from Latino voters, when … Read More.

7 Feb 2012
Romney: The DREAM Latino Unifier

In our public schools, we taught them to be civic minded and to exercise their rights as Americans. There … Read More.

31 Jan 2012
Snake Oil Peddlers

It takes a lot of gall to defend either Newt Gingrich or Mitt Romney in the Hispanic community nowadays. And yet,… Read More.

In Sotomayor Hearings, Republicans Are On Trial

Share Comment

Shortly after the Judge Sonia Sotomayor confirmation hearings began Monday, Sen. Jeff Sessions let it be known that he and other Republicans intend to play hardball.

And in the Latino community, where almost everyone enjoys a good ballgame, many people began to look for fouls.

If the Republicans play hard but fair, as the opposition party, they will be within their rights. But if their passion for extreme right-wing ideals leads to comments that could be considered racist or if Sotomayor's experience as a Latina becomes an issue, boy are they in trouble!

Sessions wasted no time demonstrating classic GOP insensitivity toward minorities. He said that the importance being placed on Sotomayor's personal background is "shocking and offensive" to him.

What an interesting choice of words! That's exactly how many Latinos may feel after Sessions and some of his Republican colleagues get done with Sotomayor.

Let's face it. In the Latino community, Republicans, not Sotomayor, are on trial. Of course, there are exceptions. I get letters from some extreme-right Latinos who make Sessions seem moderate. But they are a minute minority of extremely neurotic individuals.

Most Latinos feel an immense sense of pride because of Sotomayor's nomination, and they will feel immensely offended if the first Hispanic Supreme Court nominee is mistreated in any way, especially if it is perceived as prejudice based on her ethnicity.

When they question Sotomayor, a Puerto Rican from the Bronx, N.Y., Republicans on the Senate Judiciary Committee will be playing with their party's political future. If they represent states with few Latino voters, perhaps they feel they can afford to be arrogant. But surely, in areas where Latino voters make a difference, they will be hurting their fellow Republicans.

Even before Sotomayor got a chance to speak Monday, Sessions led the Republican offensive by immediately challenging Sotomayor's 2001 comment on how a "wise Latina" might make a better decision than a white man.

"I will not vote for — and no senator should vote for — an individual nominated by any president who believes it is acceptable for a judge to allow their own personal background, gender, prejudices or sympathies to sway their decision," Sessions charged.

While Sessions and other Republicans tried to portray Sotomayor as an activist judge — and while they pretended to be the champions of an impartial judiciary — it was Sen.

Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., who most eloquently put them in their place.

"These calls for restraint and modesty and complaints about activist judges are often code words seeking a particular kind of judge who will deliver a particular set of political outcomes," Whitehouse said.

He is right. But it applies to both sides. It's always amazing how both Democrats and Republicans try to fool the American people into believing that Supreme Court nominations have nothing to do with party politics. Whether they are Democrats or Republicans, they want us to believe that their appointees practice "judicial restraints" and that the other side appoints activists.

This time, it is the Republicans' turn to do it. And Whitehouse rightfully called them on it. "For all the talk of modesty and restraint, the right-wing justices of the court have a striking record of ignoring precedent, overturning congressional statutes, limiting constitutional protections and discovering new constitutional rights," Whitehouse charged.

When it was finally Sotomayor's turn to speak, she made it perfectly clear that her experiences as a Latina will only help to inform her decisions. "The task of a judge is not to make law," she said. "It is to apply the law."

She explained that during her 17 years on the bench, she has witnessed the human consequences of her decisions. "Those decisions have not been made to serve the interests of any one litigant, but always to serve the larger interest of impartial justice," Sotomayor said. "My personal and professional experiences help me listen and understand, with the law always commanding the result in every case," she added.

In the next few days, right before our eyes, Republican senators are likely to turn into bullies as they keep drilling Sotomayor over issues related to her Latina experience. Perhaps they will be appealing to bigots and xenophobes, or perhaps they just can't hide their own anti-Hispanic prejudices. But in the hardball game that began in the U.S. Senate Monday, although Republicans came out swinging the bats, Latinos saw them striking out.

To find out more about Miguel Perez and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2009 CREATORS.COM


Comments

2 Comments | Post Comment
The United States was on trial during the confirmation hearings for Supreme Court nominee Judge Sonia Sotomayor. The confirmation process was a choreographed socio-political sham. Judge Sotomayor was herself on trial with her disingenuous and degrading classification of herself as a "person of color".

Sotomayor caters to the political advice of her neo-liberal sponsors who work diligently to preserve the white/non-white Melting Pot caste system that places Hispanics in the category of "people of color" and perpetuates the cultural oppression of Hispanics and the cultural genocide of the Spanish Americans.

The white/non-white caste system scam serves the secular and immoral interests of the Judeo-Anglo-Saxon financial and banking oligarchy. This oligarchy does not give a damn about anybody's freedom or culture whether it be that of Hispanics or that of the majority European Americans.

The cultural genocide of the Spanish Americans of the Southwest has been in place since 1846. The practice is now directed against all European Americans. Sotomayor's repeated "people of color" incantation sends an unmistakable signal to her elite backers that she remains a safe and faithful servant of the Wall Street banksters and their genocidalist oligarchical masters.

Identity caste politics comes at the expense of all Americans. There is a principled solution to the American race problem that is anathema to the oligarchy because it threatens their power and flies in the face of the reigning Melting Pot paradigm: cultural sovereignty for all ethno-racial groups.

The USA will eventually break up as it has ceased to be the country envisioned in 1776 by the Founders. The socio-cultural political insanity on display during the confirmation hearings will not last another generation. Granting cultural sovereignty now to all ethno-racial groups creates the possibility of a peaceful or, at a minimum, a less violent transition to an otherwise inevitable future of death, destruction, breakup and general mayhem.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Luis Magno
Tue Jul 21, 2009 8:02 AM
How does voting or supporting someone based solely upon their race differ any in it's racial and xenophobic implications than voting against or refusing to support someone based solely upon their race? It doesn't. I'm getting sick of hearing hispanics complain of this while doing the same. Are there any hispanics that think Sotomayor shouldn't be a judge? I haven't heard any. Why?
Surely, it's not a racially motivated decision. Sotomayor needed to be "bashed." Her past decisions are poor and the majority of them have been overturned. I would say this whether she was he, or white, or pink. Take the race card out of this, Mr. Perez. Take your own advice. I read your columns regularly........you are a racist.
Comment: #2
Posted by: evestuart
Thu Jul 23, 2009 10:23 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Miguel Perez
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Lawrence Kudlow
Lawrence KudlowUpdated 16 Feb 2012
Judge Napolitano
Judge Andrew P. NapolitanoUpdated 16 Feb 2012
Jackie Gingrich Cushman
Jackie Gingrich CushmanUpdated 16 Feb 2012

25 Jan 2011 Obama's Senseless Cuba Bailout

5 Feb 2008 Free Trade for Freedom

10 Jul 2007 A Narrowing Field of Candidatos