creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Michelle Malkin
Michelle Malkin
25 May 2012
Obama's Land of the LOST

What's green and blue and grabby all over? President Obama's new pressure campaign for Congress to ratify the … Read More.

23 May 2012
Jaczko the Jerk: Harry Reid's Sexist Crony Gets the Boot

The embattled chair of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission resigned this week. It's a victory for … Read More.

18 May 2012
How the Gay-Marriage Mob Slimed Manny Pacquiao

Boxing champion Manny Pacquiao is guilty — of being true to his Catholic faith. The gay-marriage mob is … Read More.

Waivers for Favors: Big Labor's Obamacare Escape Hatch

Share Comment

President Obama's storytellers recently launched a White House blog series called "Voices of Health Reform," where "readers can meet average Americans already benefiting from the health reform law."

I propose a new White House series: "Voices of Health Reform Waivers," where taxpayers can meet all the politically connected unions benefiting from exclusive get-out-of-Obamacare passes — after squandering millions of their workers' dues to lobby for the job-killing, private insurance-sabotaging law from which they are now exempt.

At the end of last year, the Department of Health and Human Services had granted some 222 temporary waivers to businesses small and large, insurers, labor and other organizations that offer affordable health insurance or prescription drug coverage with limited benefits. On Wednesday, the agency quietly updated its online list, which now reveals a whopping total of 729 Obamacare escapees — in addition to four states, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Ohio and Tennessee — who collectively cover about 2.1 million enrollees.

At least one eyebrow-raising waiver recipient — the left-leaning, nationalized health care-promoting Robert Wood Johnson Foundation — has direct ties to the White House. Obama health care czar Nancy-Ann DeParle sits on the foundation's board of trustees.

Most noteworthy: One-fourth of all the waivers (182) so far have gone to Big Labor groups across the country.

The Teamsters Union, which hailed Obama last March for "enacting historic health care reform, providing health insurance to millions of Americans who don't have it and controlling costs for millions more who do," obtained waivers for 17 different locals.

The United Food and Commercial Workers International Union (UFCW), which celebrated the passage of Obamacare as "an achievement that will rank among the highest in our national experience," secured waivers for 28 different affiliates.

The International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers — which exulted after the health care law's passage that "finally, affordable and comprehensive health care coverage will be available for millions of working Americans" — saw eight of its affiliates win shelter from the Obamacare wrecking ball.

The Communications Workers of America, which sent its workers to lobby for Obamacare on Capitol Hill as part of the left-wing billionaire George Soros-funded Health Care for America Now front group, snagged a waiver that will spare a hefty 19,000 of its members from the onerous federal mandate.

And the Service Employees International Union, which poured $60 million into Democratic/Obama coffers in 2008 and millions more into the campaign for the federal health care takeover, added four new affiliates to the waiver list: SEIU Local 2000 Health and Welfare Fund, representing 161 enrollees; SEIU 32BJ North Health Benefit Fund, representing 7,020 enrollees; SEIU Local 300, Civil Service Forum Employees Welfare Fund, representing 2,000 enrollees; and SEIU Health & Welfare Fund, representing 1,620 enrollees.

That's in addition to three other previous SEIU waiver winners: Local 25 SEIU in Chicago with 31,000 enrollees; Local 1199 SEIU Greater New York Benefit Fund with 4,544 enrollees; and SEIU Local 1 Cleveland Welfare Fund with 520 enrollees.

This brings the total number of Obamacare-promoting SEIU Obamacare refugees to an estimated 45,000 workers represented by seven SEIU locals.

Without the HHS-approved exemptions, these health providers would have been forced to drop low-cost coverage for seasonal, part-time and low-wage workers due to skyrocketing premiums. The only way they are keeping their health care is by successfully begging the feds to spare them from Obamacare.

The Democrats' law seeks to eliminate the low-cost plans (known as "mini-med" plans) under the guise of controlling insurer spending on executive salaries and marketing. The ultimate goal, as I've reported before: forcing a massive shift from private to public insurance designed by government-knows-best bureaucrats.

House and Senate Republicans plan separate investigations of the Obamacare waiver process. Who got one when and why? Who knew whom? Who didn't? HHS acknowledged Thursday that some 50 sanctuary-seekers had their waiver applications denied, but would not say more. Perhaps the White House storytellers, so eager to profile the "Voices of Health Reform," can enlighten us.

Michelle Malkin is the author of "Culture of Corruption: Obama and his Team of Tax Cheats, Crooks & Cronies" (Regnery 2010). Her e-mail address is malkinblog@gmail.com.

COPYRIGHT 2011 CREATORS.COM


Comments

3 Comments | Post Comment
Glad to see its politics as usual. If you are Dem then you believe in gaining more and more social programs that a for the "good of the poor people". But (wink wink) as long as it doesn't belong to/apply to our elites, who get to feel good about enacting social programs for the poor and downtrodden. Don't worry about all the costs, it will be okay because if the nation is healthier, then the economy will improve. If you are GOP then you believe in gaining more and more tax and money policies that are good for the economy. Don't worry about the costs of it, it will be okay because every one will spend more money and its good for the economy. Neither worry about the facts that inflation is wiping out the effects of lower taxes. The tax break money isn't going towards struggling businesses. More of it now goes to the already record profit making oil companies and food companies. The health care policies is already in trouble as states and businesses ask for waiver after waiver because they can't afford the increased costs. California backed off its announced plans to raise its Blue Cross/Blue Shield individual policy rate increase of 59% that it needs to pay for this legislation that "was not going to raise the costs to those who already have insurance". But they back off only after state and federal agencies wanted to see more of their documents and the huge public scrutiny. Anyone remember last spring when the administration excoriated CAT, McDonald's, and a couple more large companies posted that they would have huge (billion of dollars) of losses related to ObamaCare. The administration was on the airwaves and in the press excoriating them for their "misleading" information regarding those costs and demanded to see their internal documents. A month later after the investigation, the White House released a small paragraph stating the companies had acted appropriately by releasing the loss information according to SEC rules and it was necessary because it really was going to cost the companies that much money in increased payments for their health care policies.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Lynn
Fri Jan 28, 2011 4:42 AM
I notice Ms. Malkin does not propose to offer a series where we can meet the "Voices of those whose jobs will be killed by the allegedly job-killing bill". Hmmm, why is that? Lessee...
Maybe because the HCR bill is not really such a "job-killer" as some claim?
Maybe because legislation always means change, so a LOT of legislation results in ending some jobs, while it may be creating other jobs, and maybe she doesn't want to have the legislation SHE likes held up to scrutiny under this criterion?
Maybe because she's worried she'd hear from people whose employment outlook was IMPROVED by this bill, and it might be way more than the volume of jobs "killed"?
Even if the HCR law killed as many jobs as she wants us to think, it is the height of audacious hypocrisy for Ms. Malkin to claim to care about jobs after spending years championing the policies and measures that led to the most disastrous economic crash in the last half-century.
Comment: #2
Posted by: cassandr
Fri Jan 28, 2011 11:41 AM
cassandr, it sounds like "The most disastrous economic crash in the last half century" must be your favorite bedtime fairy tale beginning with the evil Bush administration and ending with the saintly Obama. (Hope! Change! Two legs bad - four legs good!) But if you're as interested in truth as you pretend, why don't you go back to the Carter administration for the roots of the collapse. You might also take note that the gigantic bungling corporate frauds (Enron, Tyco, Adelphia, etc.) were thriving during the Clinton years - but Bush got blamed because it was his administration when they imploded.
Comment: #3
Posted by: Maggie Lawrence
Sat Jan 29, 2011 8:21 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Michelle Malkin
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Roland Martin
Roland S. MartinUpdated 20 Jun 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 27 May 2012

9 Oct 2009 Crime, Census and Censorship

20 Jun 2007 Behead All Those Who Insult Islam

6 Jul 2011 All the President's High-Paid “Engagers”