creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Michelle Malkin
Michelle Malkin
27 Aug 2014
Asian-Bashing Dems and Doormat Minorities Who Enable Them

Harry Reid is a bigoted Beltway corruptocrat with an interminable case of diarrhea of the mouth. The feeble-… Read More.

22 Aug 2014
The Jihadi Serial Killer no One's Talking About

For two bloody months, an armed jihadist serial killer ran loose across the country. At least four innocent … Read More.

20 Aug 2014
The Ferguson Feeding Frenzy

The most poisonous "-ism" now infecting Ferguson, Missouri, is not virulent racism. It's viral narcissism. … Read More.

The Eternal Flame of Muslim Outrage

Comment

Shhhhhhh, we're told. Don't protest the Ground Zero mosque. Don't burn a Koran. It'll imperil the troops. It'll inflame tensions. The "Muslim world" will "explode" if it does not get its way, warns sharia-peddling imam Feisal Abdul Rauf. Pardon my national security-threatening impudence, but when is the "Muslim world" not ready to "explode"?

At the risk of provoking the ever-volatile Religion of Perpetual Outrage, let us count the little-noticed and forgotten ways.

Just a few months ago in Kashmir, faithful Muslims rioted over what they thought was a mosque depicted on underwear sold by street vendors. The mob shut down businesses and clashed with police over the blasphemous skivvies. But it turned out there was no need for Allah's avengers to get their holy knickers in a bunch. The alleged mosque was actually a building resembling London's St. Paul's Cathedral. A Kashmiri law enforcement official later concluded the protests were "premeditated and organized to vitiate the atmosphere."

Indeed, art and graphics have an uncanny way of vitiating the Muslim world's atmosphere. In 1994, Muslims threatened German supermodel Claudia Schiffer with death after she wore a Karl Lagerfeld-designed dress printed with a saying from the Koran. In 1997, outraged Muslims forced Nike to recall 800,000 shoes because they claimed the company's "Air" logo looked like the Arabic script for "Allah." In 1998, another conflagration spread over Unilever's ice cream logo — which Muslims claimed looked like "Allah" if read upside-down and backward (can't recall what they said it resembled if you viewed it with 3D glasses).

Even more explosively, in 2002, an al-Qaida-linked jihadist cell plotted to blow up Bologna, Italy's Church of San Petronio because it displayed a 15th century fresco depicting Mohammed being tormented in the ninth circle of Hell. For years, Muslims had demanded that the art come down. Counterterrorism officials in Europe caught the would-be bombers on tape scouting out the church and exclaiming, "May Allah bring it all down. It will all come down."

That same year, Nigerian Muslims stabbed, bludgeoned or burned to death 200 people in protest of the Miss World beauty pageant — which they considered an affront to Allah. Contest organizers fled out of fear of inflaming further destruction. When Nigerian journalist Isioma Daniel joked that Mohammed would have approved of the pageant and that "in all honesty, he would probably have chosen a wife from among them," her newspaper rushed to print three retractions and apologies in a row.

It didn't stop Muslim vigilantes from torching the newspaper's offices. A fatwa was issued on Daniel's life by a Nigerian official in the sharia-ruled state of Zamfara, who declared that "the blood of Isioma Daniel can be shed. It is abiding on all Muslims wherever they are to consider the killing of the writer as a religious duty." Daniel fled to Norway.

In 2005, British Muslims got all hot and bothered over a Burger King ice cream cone container whose swirly-texted label resembled, you guessed it, the Arabic script for "Allah." The restaurant chain yanked the product in a panic and prostrated itself before the Muslim world. But the fast-food dessert had already become a handy radical Islamic recruiting tool. Rashad Akhtar, a young British Muslim, told Harper's Magazine how the ice cream caper had inspired him: "Even though it means nothing to some people and may mean nothing to some Muslims in this country, this is my jihad. I'm not going to rest until I find the person who is responsible. I'm going to bring this country down."

In 2007, Muslims combusted again in Sudan after an infidel elementary school teacher innocently named a classroom teddy bear "Mohammed." Protesters chanted, "Kill her, kill her by firing squad!" and "No tolerance — execution!" She was arrested, jailed and faced 40 lashes for blasphemy before being freed after eight days. Not wanting to cause further inflammation, the teacher rushed to apologize: "I have great respect for the Islamic religion and would not knowingly offend anyone, and I am sorry if I caused any distress."

And who could forget the global Danish cartoon riots of 2006 (instigated by imams who toured Egypt stoking hysteria with faked anti-Islam comic strips)? From Afghanistan to Egypt to Lebanon to Libya, Pakistan, Turkey and in between, hundreds died under the pretext of protecting Mohammed from Western slight, and brave journalists who stood up to the madness were threatened with beheading. It wasn't really about the cartoons at all, of course. Little-remembered is the fact that Muslim bullies were attempting to pressure Denmark over the International Atomic Energy Agency's decision to report Iran to the UN Security Council for continuing with its nuclear research program. The chairmanship of the council was passing to Denmark at the time. Yes, it was just another in a long line of manufactured Muslim explosions that were, to borrow a useful phrase, "premeditated and organized to vitiate the atmosphere."

When everything from sneakers to stuffed animals to comics to frescos to beauty queens to fast-food packaging to undies serves as dry tinder for Allah's avengers, it's a grand farce to feign concern about the recruitment effect of a few burnt Korans in the hands of a two-bit attention-seeker in Florida. The eternal flame of Muslim outrage was lit a long, long time ago.

Michelle Malkin is the author of "Culture of Corruption: Obama and his Team of Tax Cheats, Crooks & Cronies" (Regnery 2010). Her e-mail address is malkinblog@gmail.com.

COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM



Comments

5 Comments | Post Comment
I knew I could find some idiot somewhere who would take the position that that self-serving slob Terry Jones can go ahead and burn his books and let the chips fall where they fall. Congratulations Michelle! Screw all the American soldiers overseas battling those barbarians who would be quite happy to stone your safe, cushy little ass to death.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Masako
Thu Sep 9, 2010 7:14 PM
Good grasp of the situation. These clowns are just waiting for any excuse to 'explode', it doesn't have to be a koran burning or is it quran now? Their main objective seems to be to find any reason to kill in allah's name. They want to be offended by slights to mohammed, I on the other hand am offended by beheadings, suicide bombings, killings of women & children and innocent civilians, and sharia law. As for this preacher in Florida, he's as insane as they are.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Edward Kirk
Fri Sep 10, 2010 4:50 AM
Let us please use some restraint, the US gov't did when they refused to allow 20 somethings to bomb the ME! To get back on topic which Michelle wrote about, I can't wait to see the book of mudhomad burning and being shown "live" on every network! The image of Muslims protesting in the streets is gonna be just too funny! Gotta run, Dick's is having a big sale!
Comment: #3
Posted by: bill s
Fri Sep 10, 2010 5:53 PM
Re: Masako

The groups using religion as a shield don't need a book burning as an excuse to hate and murder us. Oops, we still breathe - that's offensive to them as well.

Let's be realistic.

Doesn't anyone find it ridiculous that the President chastised the Florida guy and his book burning but didn't chastise the countries behind the people who want to murder us, who burn our flag and see no offense there?

Perhaps those countries can rein in those fellows who are over the top?
Comment: #4
Posted by: A
Sat Sep 11, 2010 11:24 AM
You are exactly correct on the "Religion of Perpetual Outrage". It's not a religion but a political ideology. Religion doesn't teach to kill non belivers but Islam does. Therefore it is not a religion but a political movement bent on world domination. We need to stop it now.
Comment: #5
Posted by: WmR Miles
Sat Sep 11, 2010 1:33 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Michelle Malkin
Aug. `14
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Authorís Podcast
Froma Harrop
Froma HarropUpdated 28 Aug 2014
Ben Carson
Ben CarsonUpdated 27 Aug 2014
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 27 Aug 2014

26 Aug 2009 ACLU: Spying for America's Enemies

27 Apr 2011 Maxine Waters: Swamp Queen

20 Dec 2006 2006: The Year of Perpetual Outrage