creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Michelle Malkin
Michelle Malkin
25 May 2012
Obama's Land of the LOST

What's green and blue and grabby all over? President Obama's new pressure campaign for Congress to ratify the … Read More.

23 May 2012
Jaczko the Jerk: Harry Reid's Sexist Crony Gets the Boot

The embattled chair of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission resigned this week. It's a victory for … Read More.

18 May 2012
How the Gay-Marriage Mob Slimed Manny Pacquiao

Boxing champion Manny Pacquiao is guilty — of being true to his Catholic faith. The gay-marriage mob is … Read More.

Take Your Olive Branch and Shove It, Democrats

Share Comment

On the eve of a historic midterm election upheaval, President Barack Obama tried to walk back his gratuitous slap at Americans who oppose his radical progressive agenda. "I probably should have used the word 'opponents' instead of 'enemies' to describe political adversaries," Obama admitted Monday. "Probably"?

Here is an ironclad certainty: It's too little too late for the antagonist-in-chief to paper over two years of relentless Democratic incivility and hate toward his domestic "enemies." Voters have spoken: They've had enough. Enough of the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize winner's rhetorical abuse. Enough of his feints at bipartisanship. Whatever the final tally, this week's turnover in Congress is a GOP mandate for legislative pugilism, not peace. Voters have had enough of big government meddlers "getting things done." They are sending fresh blood to the nation's Capitol to get things undone.

Just two short years ago, Obama campaigned as the transcendent unifier. "Young and old, rich and poor, Democrat and Republican, black, white, Hispanic, Asian, Native American, gay, straight, disabled and not disabled, Americans have sent a message to the world that we have never been just a collection of red states and blue states," he proclaimed. "We have been and always will be the United States of America." It's been an Us vs. Them freefall ever since.

"We don't mind the Republicans joining us," Obama taunted a few weeks ago. "They can come for the ride, but they gotta sit in back."

"They're counting on young people staying home and union members staying home and black folks staying home," the fear-mongering agent of hope and change jeered on the campaign trail last month.

"You would think they'd be saying thank you," he sneered last April, when millions turned out for the nationwide Tax Day tea party protests.

"I want them just to get out of the way" and "don't do a lot of talking," he scoffed in response to prescient critics of the federal trillion-dollar stimulus boondoggle.

In addition to labeling GOP opponents of his open-borders policies "enemies" who needed to be "punished" by Latino voters, Obama accused them — that is, us — of lacking patriotism. "Those aren't the kinds of folks who represent our core American values," he told viewers of the Spanish-language network Univision.

Democratic leaders have taken their cue from Team Obama's persistent politics of polarization.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer called vocal citizens who protested the federal health care takeover bill during the town hall revolts of 2009 "un-American," too.

Remember? "These disruptions are occurring because opponents are afraid not just of differing views — but of the facts themselves. Drowning out opposing views is simply un-American," Pelosi and Hoyer blasted in an op-ed piece for USA Today last summer. "Drowning out the facts is how we failed at this task for decades."

This from the woman who called for a vengeful government investigation of grassroots opponents of the Ground Zero mosque.

Obama's pal Rep. Alan Grayson of Florida, whom the president hailed as an "outstanding" member of Congress, accused Republicans of wanting elderly people to "die quickly" and of presiding over a "holocaust in America." Vice President Joe Biden hailed Grayson as a "guy who doesn't back away from a fight, and doesn't back down from what he believes in" and told him at a fundraiser: "We owe you one, buddy." No mention of Grayson's smear of a female Federal Reserve adviser as a "K Street whore."

In California, entrenched incumbent jerk Pete Stark derided immigration enforcement activists at a town hall by asking: "Who are you going to kill today?" To an elderly constituent who opposed the health care bill, Stark retorted: "I wouldn't dignify you by peeing on your leg. It wouldn't be worth wasting the urine."

As voters who have been maligned by the ruling majority as stupid, unwashed, racist, selfish and violent headed to the polls Tuesday, Democrats released "talking points" attacking Republican leaders who "are not willing to compromise." But "no compromise" is exactly the message that un-American Americans delivered to Washington this campaign season:

No more compromising deals behind closed doors. No more compromising bailouts in times of manufactured crisis. No more compromising conservative principles for D.C. party elites. No more compromising the American economy for left-wing special interests. No more compromising transparency and ethics for bureaucratic self-preservation.

Let us be clear, in case it hasn't fully sunk into the minds of Obama and the trash-talking Democrats yet: You can take your faux olive branch and shove it. Thank you.

Michelle Malkin is the author of "Culture of Corruption: Obama and his Team of Tax Cheats, Crooks & Cronies" (Regnery 2010). Her e-mail address is malkinblog@gmail.com.

COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM


Comments

8 Comments | Post Comment
"Culture of Corruption: Obama and his Team of Tax Cheats, Crooks & Cronies" ?

Isn't that what people were saying about the Bush administration and many others?

Not for nothing but writhing an article about name calling and then calling someone a "incumbent jerk" renders your diatribe an impulsive rant.

When did we ever have an administration that was for the people, of the people and by the people without any glitches?
Comment: #1
Posted by: Thomas Parinello
Wed Nov 3, 2010 4:57 AM
One thing I find irritating is that when the left wins the presidency we are treated to boastful comments about how "smart" he is, blah, blah, blah. Carter, Clinton, Obama. Did they say that Reagan, Bush I or Bush II were smart? Nah, the left are terrible in defeat and worse in victory.

The right won a small victory last night, but being mean and refusing to talk isn't going to help. One can be steadfast and gracious at the same moment. Need I remind you that Republicans didn't hold down the spending when they had power?

This victory is not a mandate any more than Obama's was. It is an effort to seek balance and clean house. Throw some cold humility upon your rage. Don't gloat or you will sound like a democrat. Stay on point and forget past insults because there is work to be done. Cheer if and when republicans accomplish somethig of true value to our country.

Be a gracious winner because nobody wins every time. Help to build the civil discourse needed for a civil society. Lead in this by example.


Comment: #2
Posted by: Tom
Wed Nov 3, 2010 5:08 AM
We get the government we elect and now we get to see if we got what we wanted. If not then we need to be watching them like hawks and create an upheaval in washington again in 2012. If the American public wants a better life then they are going to have to take it back from the state and federal governments. It is about returning power for most decisions to the local governments when it is internal or inside the United States. The federal government should only be concerned making sure the Constitution and Bill of Rights are applied equally to every citizen in every state and what other countries are doing in relationship to us. The rest should be dealt with locally by local and state governments. We have created monsters in regards to state governments and the federal government and now it is time to put the monsters back in their cages. Keep your eye on the man or woman you elected and if they are not voting the way you think they should then kick them out the next time their name appears on a ballot. Government needs fresh blood and we need to eliminate their retirement and perk systems as well as overturning the seats each election. This is not about parties since both parties should fear the American voting public. This is about making them do the job we sent them to Washington for. Maybe it is time for both parties to disappear into the sunset and for new political parties to rise up. remember we had no parties when this country started. Only citizens sick and tired of being beaten, starved, and bullied by someone in power. Ring a bell folks?
Comment: #3
Posted by: Robert
Wed Nov 3, 2010 12:38 PM
What did you honestly expect from the election? Do you, somewhere down deep, still think there is a political solution to this mess? If so, why is that?

Only the people who wish to go on living at someone else's expense actually win "elections." The choices are usually only how much and for how long. Sort of like occasionally being "allowed" to elect the overseer who swings the whip on a slave galley. You can have master A or B... but you WILL have an overseer to whip you if you don't row fast enough - and be expected to grovel for your daily gruel and grog ration besides. Master may be nice or nasty at his pleasure, but he IS the master and you'd better not forget it.

And, unfortunately, even when there is a mutiny and the old tyrants are removed, those who "win" change nothing and the journey resumes with a different set of masters and slaves.

Until people accept personal ownership and responsibility, rejecting the ownership of others, that will continue.
Comment: #4
Posted by: MamaLiberty
Wed Nov 3, 2010 2:34 PM
I agree with Michelle ,all the time , I do not want compromise , compromise weakens your principles , and this election was all about principles . They complain about not compromisng causing gridlock , gridlock is a good thing because doing nothing is better than doing the wrong thing or compromising your principles . When you compromise with democrats you always lose because you give them something to build on . No American wants socialism , communism or progressivism except those that want every thing handed to them without having to earn anything .
Comment: #5
Posted by: Buck Crosby
Wed Nov 3, 2010 3:30 PM
"Take Your Olive Branch and Shove It"

I'm pretty sure Jesus said that.
Comment: #6
Posted by: John
Wed Nov 3, 2010 3:44 PM
I personally like the man we saw today that speaks at public forums. The problem is that I don't think Obama really is that man. I believe he is the man that we hear when he thinks we aren't listening or when he accidentally speaks off the cuff.

I believe he did think he would eliminate the red state / blue state mix. In all the countries of the world that he looks to for thought leadership, the blues simply annihilated their enemies until there was just The State. He doesn't just dislike the Republican leaders, he dislikes republicans, his population. He thought the Blues were rising, that he had a permanent majority of voters and could simply crush the remaining 40% until they were no more.

PS. Thank you for Michelle...your every post is original and not a rehash of the facts. You ARE a creator
Comment: #7
Posted by: DontSayIt
Wed Nov 3, 2010 5:28 PM
I'm glad the author is acting like an adult and taking that "olive branch" as a symbol of better things to come (sarcasm). Fighting fire with fire is quite childish, don't you think? This article is aloof, overly defensive, and ignorant of any of the Republican Party's past wrongdoings. I might be going out on a limb here, but isn't this behavior and attitude exactly what got the Republicans kicked out of office in 2008? Please, people, let's move forward and give voters a reason to feel like they finally put power in the hands of competent, mature adults.
Comment: #8
Posted by: Katie
Fri Nov 5, 2010 12:05 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Michelle Malkin
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Roland Martin
Roland S. MartinUpdated 20 Jun 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 27 May 2012

13 Nov 2009 Another Bogus ACORN Lawsuit

4 Jul 2007 The Forgotten "A" Word: Assimilation

30 Jul 2008 The Brangelina-fication of the Obamas