creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Michelle Malkin
Michelle Malkin
17 Mar 2010
The Slaughter on the Southern Border

At a joint press conference with Mexican President Felipe Calderon last year, President Obama vowed to make … Read More.

12 Mar 2010
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's Deficient Cleaning Service

"Maybe it will take a woman to clean up the House," Nancy Pelosi boasted before the 2006 midterm elections.… Read More.

10 Mar 2010
Desperate Dems Cling to Human Kiddie Shield

Have you noticed something about the audiences that President Obama has cherry-picked to cheer his government … Read More.

Inside the Monstrous Obamacare Bureaucracy

If you think government is too big and too costly, wait until Obamacare kicks in. The Congressional Budget Office put the price tag of the House Democrats' health care takeover plans at $1.5 trillion over 10 years. But the CBO's fine print included a telltale caveat:

"We have not yet estimated the administrative costs to the federal government of implementing the specified policies, nor have we accounted for all of the proposal's likely effects on spending for other federal programs."

You don't need an accounting degree or clairvoyant powers. The administrative costs and spillover spending effects will be astronomical. Look at existing federal programs. In 1966, the Office of Management and Budget put the total taxpayer costs for Medicare at $64 million. In 2011, Medicare costs are expected to balloon to nearly $500 billion. Medicaid cost $770 million in 1966. By 2011, that program will cost taxpayers an estimated $264 billion. The Virginia-based Council for Affordable Health Insurance estimated that the administrative expenses of both programs last decade were 66 percent higher than those of private sector health insurance companies.

And we ain't seen nothing yet. House Republicans on the Joint Economic Committee sifted through their opponents' 1,018-page health care bill and released a dizzying flow chart detailing the Byzantine bureaucracy Obamacare would create. Washington would become the home of at least 31 new federal programs, agencies and commissions to oversee the government-run health insurance regime.

Because 32 "czars" isn't enough, the Democratic plan would add another overlord to the Obama administration. The new "Health Choices Commissioner" would helm the new "Health Choices Administration" (section 141 of the bill) — separate from the already existing Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (formerly the Health Care Financing Administration), the Veterans Health Administration and the Indian Health Service.

Because the government has done such a boffo job managing the near-bankrupt Social Security and Medicare Trust Funds, the Democrats have proposed creating a "Public Health Investment Fund" and a "Health Insurance Exchange Trust Fund." The latter would create a "transparent and functional marketplace for individuals and small employers to comparison shop among private and public insurers."

No matter that state insurance departments already operate such systems. Health care must be "fixed." The federal cure is redundancy.

The Obamacare bill also creates a new "Bureau of Health Information" (not to be confused with the already existing National Center for Health Statistics) within the department of Health and Human Services.

A new "Assistant Secretary for Health Information" will lead the BHI. The new assistant secretary will coordinate with the recently created "National Coordinator for Health Information Technology" — who is responsible for monitoring the $19.5 billion in the stimulus law to implement "a nationwide interoperable, privacy-protected health information technology infrastructure."

New bureaucracies always have old special interests to appease. The Bureau of Health Information will house its own "Office of Civil Rights" and "Office of Minority Health." The information czar will be required to collect health statistics in the "primary language" of ethnic minorities — and, thus, the need for a new "language demonstration program" to showcase their efforts. Obamacare will also ensure "cultural and linguistics competence training" and establish "a youth public health program to expose and recruit high-school students into public health careers." The government health care juggernaut must be fed and staffed, after all.

Providing more stimulus for taxpayer-funded jobs, the Democrats' bill would add a new "Senior Advisor for Health Care Fraud" and require the Attorney General to appoint a "Senior Counsel for Health Care Fraud Enforcement." There's already a national Health Care Fraud and Abuse Control Program, but who's counting?

To coordinate all the new bureaucrats, Obamacare would create a new "Health Care Program Integrity Coordinating Council" to "to coordinate strategic planning among federal agencies involved in health care integrity and oversight."

To make sure all the existing local and state environmental public health agencies don't feel lonely, the Democrats' plan creates a new "Coordinated Environmental Public Health Network" to "build upon and coordinate among existing environmental and health data collection systems and create state environmental public health networks."

A new "National Health Care Workforce Commission" will be "tasked with reviewing health care workforce and projected workforce needs." New funding will be available for a "demonstration program to improve immunization coverage" that would enable government busybodies to send reminders or recalls for patients or providers, or make home visits.

Who'll be looking out for you? The House bill creates a "public plan ombudsman" and a "special health insurance exchange inspector general" to police spending and guard against waste, fraud and abuse. Given the sad fate of aggressive watchdogs in the age of Obama, however, these positions will end up like every other new agency, commission, task force and office created to serve the federal health care beast: black holes.

Michelle Malkin is the author of the forthcoming "Culture of Corruption: Obama and his Team of Tax Cheats, Crooks & Cronies" (Regnery 2009). Her e-mail address is malkinblog@gmail.com.

COPYRIGHT 2009 CREATORS.COM



Comments

2 Comments | Post Comment

You are so clear on this issue, Michelle! Redundancy, by any other name, is still redundancy! And the costs just keep on coming! Guess it all depends on which side of Bo's plans you sit, and I say "sit" because, apparently, not many supporters stand! And of those who do stand, they won't be for long. Lofty goals and ideals are well received and heard but not many prove fruitfull without dramatic costs. Good intention is the pavement for the road to ruin. I can't help but wonder, how do they like him so far? Guess that all depends on where you sit, too.

Comment: #1
Posted by: bill s
Fri Jul 17, 2009 10:30 AM

Ma'am;...There is no way around the fact that the nation has to support the citizen, and it is best if all the citizens play a part in that, supporting themselves, and supporting their own... The fact is that capital profits when it works fewer and fewer, harder and harder, and lays off all the rest to fend for themselves... We have reached a point in this country where the profit of a fraction has drained all the wealth and capital of many generation out of this people, and even out of the government until we are, government and people, destitute, and without visible means of support...Yet the fact remains that the nation, the land, the property, the rich and poor alike must support all its members, or get about the grisly task of deciding who will be denied, and who will die... In that case, capital will have reached its ultimate goal, where the good it promises is shown to be false and futile... Capital has failed us... Will we now fail each other???... Will we let the rich who have plundered the nation remain unplundered???Is not turn around fair play???I would say the pass lies before us, and only the healthy and strong will get beyond it... We must fight for the life of this people over the desire of the rich to see us unhealthy, sick, and dying without hope... We have to demand our rights or surrender to slavery... We must take our freedom or see our freedom taken from us to protect profit... Is this our land, or is it sold forever to the rich who ride us??? That is the question we must answer, and all others are insignificant... The answer is simple: As the rich have taken from us, by hook or by crook, we must take from them, finally and forever... Thanks...Sweeney

Comment: #2
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Fri Jul 17, 2009 8:00 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:
Creators.com comments policy
More
Michelle Malkin
Mar. `10
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
28 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Joe Conason
Joe ConasonUpdated 18 Mar 2010
R. Emmett Tyrrell
R. Emmett Tyrrell Jr.Updated 18 Mar 2010
Jackie Gingrich Cushman
Jackie Gingrich CushmanUpdated 18 Mar 2010

11 Sep 2009 How Obama Cronyism Threatens Rail Security

7 Oct 2009 Spin Doctors for Obamacare

20 Feb 2008 Michelle Obama's America -- and Mine