Obama Losing Rock-star Status Among Young Voters
Last week, Barack Obama delivered speeches at universities in Chapel Hill, N.C., Iowa City, Iowa, and Boulder, Colo. The trip was, press secretary Jay Carney assured us, official government business, not political campaigning.
It's part of a pattern. Neil Munro of the Daily Caller has counted 130 appearances by the president, vice president, their spouses, White House officials, and Cabinet secretaries at colleges and universities since spring 2011.
Obviously, the Obama campaign strategists are worried that he cannot duplicate his 66 to 32 percent margin among young voters back in 2008.
Recent surveys of young people show inconsistent results. Gallup's tracking shows Obama leading Mitt Romney 64 to 29 percent, and a Harvard Institute of Politics poll shows him leading Romney 43 to 26 percent among those who said they had an opinion.
But a March survey of 18- to 24 year olds by the Public Religion Research Institute showed Obama ahead of "a Republican" by only 48 to 41 percent. Only 52 percent had favorable opinions of Obama, and 43 percent had unfavorable opinions.
Where the surveys seem to be in accord is that young voters are less engaged, less likely to vote and less enthusiastic about Obama than in the days when he was proclaiming, "We are the change we are seeking."
Gallup shows only 56 percent of Americans under 30 saying they definitely will vote. Among older Americans, the figure is over 80 percent. The most recent NBC/Wall Street Journal poll showed only 45 percent of young people taking a big interest in the election, down from 63 percent in 2008.
Hispanics and blacks make up a larger share of the Millennial generation than of older Americans, and Obama's support among them seems to remain high. But the Harvard survey shows that only 41 percent of white Millennials approve of Obama's job performance, significantly lower than the 54 percent who voted for him in 2008.
Obama's decision to campaign — er, conduct official business — on university campuses last week was not surprising. According to exit polls, there was no surge of young voters in 2008. They made up 18 percent of voters, compared to 17 percent in 2004.
But close inspection of the election returns showed that the Obama campaign did a splendid job of ginning up turnout in university and college towns and in singles apartment neighborhoods in central cities and close-in suburbs, like Arlington, Va., across the Potomac from Washington.
Consider the counties where Obama spoke last week. In Orange County, N.C., Obama won 72 percent of the vote. He did better in only one of the state's 99 other counties, Durham, which has a large black population plus Duke University.
Obama carried Johnson County, Iowa, with 70 percent of the vote, more than in any of Iowa's other 98 counties. He carried Boulder County, Colo., with 72 percent, a mark exceeded in that state only in Denver, one rural Hispanic county and two counties with fashionable ski resorts (Aspen, Telluride).
What Obama doesn't seem to have done in 2008 is mobilize more economically marginal and educationally limited young people, except perhaps among blacks.
His problem this year is that there are a lot more economically marginal young people, including many who are not educationally limited.
Young people are notoriously transient, and it's hard for political organizers to track them down. Harder perhaps this year, with many recent college graduates unable to find jobs and a rising percentage of young people moving in with their parents.
Few young Americans bothered to vote in Republican primaries, and young people's attitudes toward Mitt Romney seem frosty. They still know little about him.
That gives him a chance to argue that Obama's economic policies have failed and that his policies can spark an economic revival that will provide myriad opportunities for the iPod/Facebook generation to find satisfying work where they can utilize their special talents.
In his campus speeches, Obama stumped for keeping low interest rates on student loans. But young people may be figuring out that colleges and universities are gobbling up the money government pours in, leaving them saddled with debt.
It's a side issue. The Harvard survey showed 58 percent of Millennials saying the economy was a top issue and only 41 percent approving Obama's handling of it. Like Romney, they seem to be saying, "It's the economy, and we're not stupid."
Michael Barone, senior political analyst for The Washington Examiner (www.washingtonexaminer.com), is a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, a Fox News Channel contributor and a co-author of The Almanac of American Politics. To find out more about Michael Barone, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.
COPYRIGHT 2012 THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER
DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM


|
 |
Comments
|
11 Comments | Post Comment
|
|
Sir;... You know, the young can smell hair dye on a politician the way lions used to smell hypocracy on a Christian... It does not matter what promises a man makes to get elected, because left or right, reasonable people see the benefit of governing from the center... The thing is that the people stirred up and polarized by partisan politics to get them off their butts and voting the party line are little inclined for moderation of any sort from those they voted for... Politicians set out to capture the voters and are inevitably captured by them, made prisoners of a sort by their own antics, hyperbole and rhetoric... It is enough to make one ponder the vicissitudes of history which finds people only in revolutionary times, and then for one brief moment as the masters of their fates, and then fate and events gain the upper hand and push them on to the end... There is an aching need for change in this society that not one on the right and only few on the left will recognize and address...Anyone who thinks to master and surf this huricane for change is a fool.. This bus is on the tipping point and we are all that is keeping it on the cliff... Which way do you want to lean??? Because it may be too late for Mr. Obama to radicalize his base, and if he does not give them some reason to vote for him, then he is done... But then, what will the right do with all those it has radicalized??? You can talk unity after an election but everyone, even the democrats who prize unity above all else know such talk is just talk...So; stir up the people... Rabble rouse as though the rabble were not already up in arms and ready for action... I warn you folks that it is easier to talk about putting a leash and muzzle on a mob than it is to do it...Thanks... Sweeney
Comment: #1
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Mon Apr 30, 2012 5:47 AM
|
|
|
|
Young people do want hope and change, but didn't and can't find it with Obama. Young voters know there is a problem with this country that they'll eventually have to deal with. They know social security won't be there for them in 40 years. They want hope and change, but no one can give it to them. Its sad really.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Chris McCoy
Mon Apr 30, 2012 9:21 AM
|
|
|
|
Re: Chris McCoy
Young people do find it with Obama, Chris, the numbers are clear unless you use the one research pole that Barone sites which doesn't show almost a 50% advantage for Obama in all cases.
What Barone quotes? Public Religion Research Institute, which still showed Obama ahead of "a Republican" by only 48 to 41 percent. Only 52 percent had favorable opinions of Obama, and 43 percent had unfavorable opinions.
Oh, the religion research institute, there's a moderate, fair, unbiased group, SNARK, made up, I'm sure, of a bunch of Tea Party whack jobs, and Theocratic extremists. What a joke, you can be sure that young people are moderate independent and progressive for the most part, unless you survey some right wing born again Christian colleges where the little robots run around spouting the party line. You know, the Universities where science studies have the cavemen playing tennis with the dinosaurs and the earth is flat and 2000 years old.
Obama has the women, (which Romney pissed off ), the minorities, (which Romney pissed off), the intelligent, (which Romeny can't win over), nice try though Barone.......what Romney has locked up is the 1%, and even they don't like him.
"
"Conservative" Mantra, if I spend enough money on lies, the people will believe me
Comment: #3
Posted by: Bloom Hilda
Mon Apr 30, 2012 9:50 AM
|
|
|
|
Gallup polls show that young voters go for Obama rather than Romney, but are unenthusiastic about either and will most likely not show up on election day. Neither candidate will create a brighter future for them either way.
Comment: #4
Posted by: Chris McCoy
Mon Apr 30, 2012 11:03 AM
|
|
|
|
Re: Chris McCoy
Not true Chris, if the GOP Congress hadn't focused on destroying Obama and focused on doing their job, which is representing the voters, and solving our problems, great things could have happened. Let's hope with Obama winning a second term, getting rid of at least a couple of ancient right wingnut Supremes, and replacing some Tea party whore congressmen, he can accomplish his clear 2008 mandates. It's not a dream, it's a reality, the GOP had no one acceptable to replace him, they presented a cast of circus clowns, and religious nut jobs, and a corporate predator. The least noxious of the bunch is the corporate predator. The GOP will now throw obscene amounts of money at Romney with blatant lies about Obama, which will stream non-stop until the election.
The money spent on this election could have saved how many essential programs?
don't even go there.
"Conservative" Mantra: If I flood the airwaves with enough lies about Obama, people will believe them
Comment: #5
Posted by: Bloom Hilda
Mon Apr 30, 2012 12:24 PM
|
|
|
|
Lets both agree that Romney and the GOP all suck balls. Now that thats out of the way, Obama has done nothing but screw the next generation. He's passed the NDAA, which strips their liberties. Accumulated massive debt, which must be paid off down the line. He refuses to reforms social security, which is set to go bankrupt long before they retire. He promises students more government subsidised loans, not an actual reduction in tuition rates. Want to bash the GOP, go nuts, but stop making excuses for the man who has down more than his fair share of putting America is the sewers.
Comment: #6
Posted by: Chris McCoy
Mon Apr 30, 2012 1:01 PM
|
|
|
|
Re: Chris McCoy
Not true Chris, if the GOP Congress hadn't focused on destroying Obama and focused on doing their job, which is representing the voters, and solving our problems, great things could have happened. Let's hope with Obama winning a second term, getting rid of at least a couple of ancient right wingnut Supremes, and replacing some Tea party whore congressmen, he can accomplish his clear 2008 mandates. It's not a dream, it's a reality, the GOP had no one acceptable to replace him, they presented a cast of circus clowns, and religious nut jobs, and a corporate predator. The least noxious of the bunch is the corporate predator. The GOP will now throw obscene amounts of money at Romney with blatant lies about Obama, which will stream non-stop until the election.
The money spent on this election could have saved how many essential programs?
don't even go there.
"Conservative" Mantra: If I flood the airwaves with enough lies about Obama, people will believe them
Comment: #7
Posted by: Bloom Hilda
Mon Apr 30, 2012 1:07 PM
|
|
|
|
You just reposted the same thing. The only way you can make Obama look good is to put him next to the GOP and make him out to be the lesser of 2 evils. But the lesser of 2 evils is still evil.
Comment: #8
Posted by: Chris McCoy
Mon Apr 30, 2012 2:01 PM
|
|
|
|
Re: Chris McCoy; ... You must try to understand the huge effort on the part of the republicans to first defeat social security, and then deny it funds, and then to convince everyone it will not be there for them, so that those with the means will risk their futures in the stock market... What would have happened if we had not used the SS trust fund to offset the government debt??? Well; we might have had to tax more over many years to make the balance seem better, and that would have been a curb on international expansion... So; what is the cure now??? Well; it would be to tax more, with even less business in this land to tax...If the government demanded more of contibutions to sustain social security, as the republicans will never support, then the employers would have to raise wages to keep employees out of poverty, but that would again place a limit on empire building...
The only choices left to government is to see social security reduced to spare change that prolongs the lives of the old of this land in dire poverty, of yank it off from under them like a rug and see them die in droves... One must consider what is politically acceptable, and what can be sold to the young... The young are correct to think that the old have little to offer society... The answers sold to the old did not serve them well in their own day and now are used up...Why should the young honor the old when, if they had not bought into the democratic promises of pie in the sky, then there was a chance thing might well have changed for good and all, and the capitalist class might have been reined in, or even hobbled...With social security and the safety net generally, the rich neutralized the working class while they went about destroying
communism...
It was a brilliant stratagy... And now they can turn their eliminate any danger from the working class... If they attack social programs and deny the government taxes, both will be so busy thanking god or covering their bills that they will have no time for resistence... All that is missing from today's ruling class is a sense of the long game...Today's rich see their chances and they are taking them...They should know that times of depression, war, and disease are times of profit... The big fish can gobble up the small fish and all the fry they can belly... The only danger to the rich is that they will drive working people into some sense of self consciousness, but the chances are slim since the poor are sold on the idea of socialism bad, and capitalism good...
No person is more free than he, or she is free to imagine, and if the vocablulary is the captive of the rich, the poor will be too...It is a myth that some rights are inalienable... When property has rights, right are property, and when people are starved into submission by the rich, they will forget about holding onto grama's farm, will dispose of their rights, and the capital built up by generations before them...Our commonwealth has been sold to buy down the national debt from the rich who often borrowed from the government to loan it the money back... All the government has left to sell are our entitlements and with that we will all have to part with the last of our capital...You know, Capitalism never took off until the black plague, and those people with suddenly more capital than they could use soon found themselves reduced to a bare minimum again by the predations of wealth... There is plenty of money to fund social security and universal health care... It is just that the rich, having our money, now want out rights... Thanks.... Sweeney
Comment: #9
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Mon Apr 30, 2012 2:49 PM
|
|
|
|
Re: Chris McCoy
How much of your list of what Obama didn't do was within his power to accomplish with an obstructionistic Congress......Seriously, do you think he could just say, OK, we're going to do XYZ, so it's done? It's not an excuse, it's reality. Remember the tax debacle before Christmas? The GOP was going to let the tax assistance expire, rather than compromise, they compromised at the final bell, they didn't care who got hurt, they just wanted to win and crush Obama. This has been going on since 2008, for the past year the goal of Congress has been to destroy Obama, not solve our problems. Obama has no special secret power to make instant changes anymore than he can make your gas price $1.15 a gallon. Until all houses are bi-partisan, nothing will be accomplished, why do you think the approval rating for Congress is in the 20's? The onus is on all of us to tell our Congressperson to KNOCK IT OFF and do your job.
"Conservative" Mantra: I've got mine, screw you
Comment: #10
Posted by: Bloom Hilda
Mon Apr 30, 2012 4:06 PM
|
|
|
|
I'm not going to blame Obama for gas prices. Thats reaching in my opinion and theres plenty of other stuff. The problem with your agrument is that the Dems had a supermajority until 2010. If they got that God-awful healthcare bill through, they could have gotten anything through. And second, I'm just as mad about what he's done as I am what he's left undone. Like the NDAA, Fast and Furious, and a dozen failed green energy loans.
Comment: #11
Posted by: Chris McCoy
Mon Apr 30, 2012 5:11 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
Author’s Podcast
|