creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Michael Barone
Michael Barone
16 Feb 2012
A Failure of Imagination Put Metro on Wrong Track

Believers in central planning should take a look at Washington's Metro rail transit system. While they will … Read More.

13 Feb 2012
Romney Appeals to White Collars, Santorum to Blue

Rick Santorum won big victories in three small contests in the Republican presidential race last Tuesday. In … Read More.

9 Feb 2012
GOP Must Convince Young People It's the Party of Options

The Republican presidential candidates, except for Ron Paul, haven't been paying much attention to young … Read More.

A Year Later, Signs of Progress Around the World

Share Comment

The world looks safer, friendlier, more hopeful than it did as we approached Christmastime last year.

Then, we were on the defensive, perhaps on the verge of defeat, in Iraq. The Europeans' attempts to persuade Iran to renounce nuclear weapons seemed to have failed. Hugo Chavez was using his near-dictatorial powers and the oil wealth of Venezuela to secure the election of opponents of the American "empire" in Latin America.

Today, things look different. And they suggest, to me at least, that the policies of the Bush administration, pilloried as bankrupt by the Democrats after their victory in congressional elections in November, have served American interests better than most Americans then thought.

Start with Iraq. The surge strategy, opposed by almost all Democrats in Congress and the party's presidential candidates, has clearly worked. Violence has sharply decreased; Iraqi Sunnis have turned against al-Qaida and toward the Shiite-dominated government; bottom-up reconciliation has gone forward in apparently all areas of the country. Polls show that despite minimal coverage in the mainstream media for many months, most Americans are coming to understand that the surge is working.

True, majorities still say that we should not have gone into Iraq in the first place. And George W. Bush's job rating has rebounded only a little, if at all. There is room for criticism of his record: If the surge has been so successful, why didn't he order it some months or even years earlier? But the prospect of a non-dictatorial Iraq, friendly to the United States, growing economically and peaceful enough to nurture civil society, is now within sight — as it wasn't a year ago.

Then go to Iran. The National Intelligence Estimate unveiled Dec. 3 stated that Iran had stopped its nuclear weapons program back in 2003. But it also noted, though this didn't make the headlines, that the mullahs' regime is continuing its enrichment of uranium. Uranium enrichment is the single hardest part of making a deliverable nuclear weapon, and the NIE also stated that the mullahs could resume their nuclear weapons program anytime soon.

In the short run, the NIE will probably make it harder for us to persuade Russia and China, and perhaps the Europeans, to impose tougher sanctions on Iran.

And it forecloses any possibility of a U.S. military attack, although my own not totally uninformed opinion is that there was no prospect of George W. Bush ordering one in any case. But note the date on which Iran allegedly stopped the weapons program: What happened in 2003? Is it possible that the major military action in Iraq and the capture of Saddam Hussein, which motivated Muammar Qaddafi to cancel Libya's nuclear weapons program, had the same effect on Iran's mullahs? If so, it was not as much of a blunder as so many Americans thought a year ago.

And then there's Venezuela. Hugo Chavez asked voters to make him president for life and give him the power to seize all private property. They declined by a 51 percent to 49 percent margin. The brave students who monitored voting sites might have prevented him from stealing this referendum.

We can be reasonably sure that Chavez will make more mischief in Latin America and undermine the vibrant democracy of next-door Colombia, and it's possible that by rejecting the Colombia Free Trade Agreement, congressional Democrats will do the latter, as well. But the rejection of Chavez's plan by the people in whose name he claims to speak is a shattering blow to his prestige that will resonate all across Latin America. It will amplify the words King Juan Carlos I, who has done more than anyone else to advance freedom and democracy in Spain and the Spanish-speaking world, addressed to him at a recent conference: "Why don't you just shut up?"

Not all these favorable events are the work of George W. Bush and the United States. Iraqi Sunnis started turning against al-Qaida even before the surge began, the mullahs (assuming the NIE is correct) may have moved partly out of fear that their own people would rise up against them, and the Venezuelans who rejected Chavez's referendum acted without much encouragement from the United States. So if the world does seem safer, American voters might forget that we still have many vicious enemies determined to inflict great harm on us and install a president who believes we can resume the holiday from history we seemed to be enjoying in the 1990s. But as Christmas approaches, we have more to be thankful for than we did this time last year.

To read more political analysis by Michael Barone, visit www.usnews.com/baroneblog. To find out more about Michael Barone, and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2007 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.

??

??

??

??


Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment
I don't think I've ever read a column so rife with rank ignorance and/or misinformation as this one. Where to begin?

Iraq? Far from turning toward the Shi'ite government, the Sunnis in that government have all walked out, and their leader was placed under house arrest until released under pressure from the US. Don't you read the paper? And here's a Murdoch paper's take on the "bottom-up" reconciliation taking place:

http://timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/iraq/article2937104.ece

You apparently learned nothing from Vietnam. Then as now, that light at the end of the tunnel you're seeing is an oncoming train.

As for Venezuela, Chavez in no way asked voters to make him president for life. He sought to remove term limits. There's a difference -- a big one. And when the majority went against him, he accepted it, unlike certain recent elections in the US. As for your snide remark about brave students keeping him from stealing it, nice try, but there is no evidence that any election in Venezuela since he's been in power has been anything but free and fair -- again, unlike certain elections in the US.

Well, ignorance is bliss, as they say, and you're Exhibit A, but the party's about over. No one believes President Bush or his media parrots anymore, thus his continuing gutter-level approval ratings which so mystify you, despite all the "good news" from Iraq. You reap what you sow, and the chickens do come home to roost. Enjoy.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Gregg Gordon
Mon Dec 10, 2007 6:23 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Michael Barone
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Michelle Malkin
Michelle MalkinUpdated 27 Feb 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 20 Feb 2012
Mark Levy
Mark LevyUpdated 18 Feb 2012

15 Nov 2010 Bush Had Ups and Downs, but the Surge Counted Most

5 Apr 2010 Under Obama, a diminished sense of opportunity

2 Feb 2012 After Big Win, Romney Faces Tough Opponents in a Long War