opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Michael Barone
Michael Barone
25 Aug 2015
Hillary Clinton and 'Black Lives Matter': An Unproductive Confrontation

Reporters and voters have so far gotten few glimpses of Hillary Clinton speaking candidly. One of the few … Read More.

21 Aug 2015
Donald Trump's Half-Serious, Half-Fantasy Immigration Plan

Donald Trump's six-page platform on immigration may not be, as Ann Coulter wrote, "the greatest political … Read More.

18 Aug 2015
The Strange Death of the Center-Left

In 1935 George Dangerfield published "The Strange Death of Liberal England, 1910-1914," a vivid account of … Read More.

Two Impossible Things That Could Happen in 2016


"One can't believe impossible things," Alice objected.

"I daresay you haven't had much practice," the Red Queen replied. "When I was your age, I always did it for half an hour a day. Why, sometimes I've believed as many as six impossible things before breakfast."

You may be reading this sometime after breakfast, and six is a pretty large number of impossible things. But looking at developments in the 2016 campaign, I can see two impossible things — impossible in the sense that almost every pundit (including me) ruled them out — that might happen in the weeks and months ahead.

The first impossible thing is that Hillary Clinton might stop being the undisputed frontrunner for the Democratic nomination.

There have been two good reasons for believing this to be impossible. One is that even in the swirl of the email controversy, a very large majority of self-identified Democrats continue to have positive feelings about Clinton. That includes the 25 percent or so nationally and the 40 or so percent in New Hampshire who say they'd vote for Bernie Sanders right now.

That shows that one Democratic constituency — the Birkenstock Belt — is willing to consider an alternative. What would happen if another — black Democrats — should prove willing to do so as well?

The answer: disaster for the Clinton campaign. As analysts have pointed out, even if Clinton loses Iowa and New Hampshire, the next big set of contests come in Southern states, where blacks make up nearly half or more of Democratic primary voters. And black voters tend to coalesce, in primaries as well in November, for one candidate.

That's a rational response for people who are self-conscious members of a persecuted and discriminated-against minority. In the past, black Democrats have been nearly unanimous for one candidate even over another who has strong claims on their support — e.g., Robert Kennedy over Hubert Humphrey in 1968 and Barack Obama over Hillary Clinton 40 years later.

Right now, Clinton has the kind of black support Humphrey would have had if Kennedy had not run. But what if Joe Biden entered the race with the explicit or strongly implied support of President Obama?

Maybe that could happen. On Monday, White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest said he "wouldn't rule out the possibility of an endorsement" in the primary and added that "no one in American politics today" knows more about running for president than Biden and that Obama considered his Biden VP pick as "the smartest decision that he has ever made in politics." Hmm.

The second impossible thing that could happen is a vast expansion of the Republican primary electorate — and general election turnout.

Sparked, at least initially, but not necessarily permanently, by Donald Trump.

The New York Times reported last week that other Republican candidates' strategists discount Trump's current poll leads on the grounds that the polls "rely on feedback from many Republicans who are unlikely to vote" because they aren't registered Republicans or haven't voted in past primaries.

It's true that past Republican turnout has been low. In 2008, 37 million Americans voted in Democratic primaries and caucuses and only 21 million voted in Republican contests. Hillary Clinton, while losing the nomination, got almost as many votes as the three leading Republicans put together.

Similarly, many analysts blame Mitt Romney's 2012 loss on conservatives staying home. Barack Obama got 3.5 million fewer votes in 2012 than in 2008. Usually incumbents who drop that far lose. But Romney got only 1 million more votes than John McCain in 2008.

Even in a period of close partisan divisions, when one party's turnout increases it can win decisively. Democratic total votes increased 10.5 million when Obama won in 2008. Republican total votes increased 11.5 million when George W. Bush was re-elected in 2004.

One metric we have so far suggests a huge increase in Republican votes: 24 million people watched the Republican debate in Cleveland August 6. That's almost triple the previous Republican high and double the Democrats' record — which came in 2008, when the party's primary and general electorate expanded.

Donald Trump accounts for much of Republicans' big audience, but perhaps not all: some 6 million watched the second-tier candidates' pre-prime-time debate. The big question now is whether another candidate can entice Trump's predominantly older, non-college-graduate enthusiasts. Hmm.

Will these two impossible things happen? After all, the Red Queen only said that you could believe impossible things. But they did happen to Alice.

Michael Barone, senior political analyst at the Washington Examiner (, where this article first appeared, is a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, a Fox News Channel contributor and a co-author of The Almanac of American Politics. To find out more about Michael Barone, and read features by other Creators writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate Web page at



1 Comments | Post Comment
No one asked me, but from the beginning of the Trump phenomenon, I have believed that he is serving a useful purpose by shaking up the rest of the field, causing them to listen to Trump's ideas, obviously popular to a lot of people, and giving the other candidates pause to reexamine their own thinking and agendas. I don't think he will survive to become the next nominee, but the cross-pollination he is bringing about will result in a better GOP nominee. His bombast also demonstrates that it is OK to be more aggressive than the GOP was in the last two election cycles. No place for wimps this time around.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Derel Schrock
Fri Aug 28, 2015 5:35 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right: comments policy
Michael Barone
Aug. `15
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
26 27 28 29 30 31 1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31 1 2 3 4 5
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Authorís Podcast
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 31 Aug 2015
Newspaper ContributorsUpdated 31 Aug 2015
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 30 Aug 2015

8 Oct 2012 Romney's Debate Win Opens Cracks in Obama Firewall

13 Dec 2013 Obamacare's Rocky Rollout Improves Republicans' 2014 Outlook

9 May 2010 In Britain, a Cautionary Tale for U.S. Parties