creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Matt Towery
Matt Towery
24 May 2012
Why Rubio for Vice President Makes Sense

Yes, this column is based out of Florida, so it would seem that an opinion piece suggesting that Marco Rubio … Read More.

17 May 2012
A Cash-strapped Battle for Florida's Senate Seat

Many decades ago as a young punk working in Washington, I was given the job of teaching public speaking and … Read More.

10 May 2012
Lugar Defeat Sends Many Messages

The defeat of Indiana Sen. Richard Lugar has political tongues wagging all over the nation. Lugar was a major … Read More.

Mama Can't Find a Doctor, and Other Fallout From New Democratic Legislation

Share Comment

Lately, even the most elite in media have started to report some of the intended and unintended consequences of the rushed and ill-conceived federal health care bill passed earlier this year by the Barack Obama administration and the Democrat-controlled Congress.

And I've had my first eye-opener. Like everyone of their generation, my parents automatically qualify for Medicare. Soon after the new health care bill passed, their personal physician retired. When they set about looking for a new one, they kept hearing the same refrain: "We are no longer accepting new patients."

Why? Because while Congress fashioned a massive — and massively expensive — new health care program, they have also allowed Medicare reimbursements to physicians to be reduced. Many seniors have physicians who are their contemporaries because they've been under their care for many years. As these older physicians retire, their patients are scrambling to find replacements. They're encountering "do not apply" signs on the doors of medical facilities.

Now that's change you can believe in.

Next comes the unfolding realization that the new law is stocked with all sorts of little gems that are destined to make life harder for the young and those still working. For example, many small businesses already dread the annual task of creating 1099 tax forms for those individual contractors they pay each year for goods and services. Apparently they now also will be required to issue similar forms to every corporation, vendor or other party they pay during the taxable year.

As interpreted by many, the new law suggests the need for, say, a local hardware store to search out the tax identification number of huge corporations they pay for products or services. If this interpretation of the law is correct, and it's truly enforced, business in America will be ground to a halt by a cascade of paperwork.

Also in the coming months, all types of entities touched by the new financial reform laws will suddenly learn that they are required to comply with new bureaucratic rules related to the ethnicity, or other demographic profiles, of their employees. Maybe this is well-intended, but once again the burden of compliance will be staggering.

There's more. Under the guise of a "watered down" climate bill, there could soon be plenty of opportunities to add even more costs to American businesses.

Ultimately, those costs will be passed on to consumers, of course.

Take the example of the possible ramifications of requiring energy companies to generate specific percentages of their total energy output from wind, solar and other non-traditional sources. The goals being put forth are unattainable, and the inefficiencies and high costs of trying to reach them anyway will only result in higher energy bills for all. And government subsidies to support these new energy sources will mean tax dollars being wasted.

There has been a mad rush to pass all these half-baked pieces of legislation. Now, as the devilish details start to emerge, it's becoming clear that these new laws will have a huge impact on the lives of millions of Americans.

The past provides examples of how poorly designed legislation can eventually lead to sad results. Recall that lovely deal cut by congressional Republicans when they passed the "Bush tax cuts."

In a compromise effort designed to gain passage of the cuts, the GOP agreed to sunset them in 2010. They even went so far as to gradually reduce the so-called death tax to virtually nothing in the year 2010, only to allow it to revert to its punitive original percentages in 2011.

So not only does it stand to reason that mama and daddy can't find a physician. It also stands to reason that their kids might not want them to find one, thanks to the onerous "death tax" penalties if those parents live beyond this year! (Yes, I'm kidding, but this shows a perversity of the coming tax laws.)

This demonstrates that the Republicans of the Bush years could pass legislation just as stupid as anything that's been passed by Democrats this year.

But there's a difference. The GOP passed bad laws out of sloppiness, and from the presumption that they would remain in power for the foreseeable future. The legislation emerging from the current Congress and the Obama administration apparently has a different motive. The Democrats seem less concerned with keeping power in the long run and more concerned about altering every feature of the economic landscape before the nation wakes up to the realization that we have been buried under an avalanche of paper, forced to look for physicians that aren't available or are just plain out of business.

Matt Towery is author of the new book, "Paranoid Nation: The Real Story of the 2008 Fight for the Presidency." He heads the polling and political information firm InsiderAdvantage. To find out more about Matthew Towery and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM


Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment
Matt says "Take the example of the possible ramifications of requiring energy companies to generate specific percentages of their total energy output from wind, solar and other non-traditional sources. The goals being put forth are unattainable, and the inefficiencies and high costs of trying to reach them anyway will only result in higher energy bills for all." That is bad, but the way it is happening (right now) is worse.
Take for example, American Municipal Power in Ohio. In order to get approval for a needed new natural gas electric plant, they had to give up on their cheaper coal plant. But worse still, they are pushing solar power from Ohio through the mid-Atlantic where it makes no sense (it doesn't pay for itself in dry sunny places with twice as much solar energy either but at least it produces power there). So, for example, the town of Front Royal gets to hear a pitch of why they should pay 50% more for solar power which comes with a legal contract stating that they guarantee no delivery of power whatsoever. See http://www.nvdaily.com/news/2010/07/council-hears-another-solar-farm-pitch.php
But worse, the same AMP teamed up with a shady (and I don't make this accusation lightly) company in Maryland to promise 300 MW of expensive and unreliable solar power. See http://www.dispatch.com/live/content/business/stories/2010/06/09/planners-counting-on-ohio-sunshine.html?sid=101 This announcement was made not too long after the Dept of Energy dedicated some money for a gas line for AMP's gas generation plant. Could there be any connection from that money to AMP's attempts to push expensive green energy? Whose interests are served by more expensive energy?
Worse still Standard Energy teamed up with a local company called SolAVerde who knew little about solar power but knew plenty about scams, one of their partners is a felon (drug dealer). Again, I make no claims lightly and have verified my facts with independent sources. When the town of Front Royal found out the felon was involved, that quickly killed the very real enthusiasm for feel-good green power (while deluded in my opinion, the positive feelings about the solar plant were genuine - see nvdaily.com articles from last fall).
So from the UN's IPCC slipshod activist science at the top to the local scammer at the bottom, the goal is to cajole the rubes in small town America into buying into the greatest display of socialized economics ever seen. Meanwhile our two shiftless Senators Webb and Warner voted against reigning in the EPA's abuse of the Clean Air Act to shut down large CO2 sources. It simply doesn't matter if cap and trade passes at all, the EPA is already implementing it.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Eric
Sat Jul 24, 2010 7:55 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Matt Towery
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Roland Martin
Roland S. MartinUpdated 20 Jun 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 27 May 2012

8 Apr 2010 America's Work Ethic Going the Way of France

7 Oct 2010 GOP Must Be Wary of Overconfidence and Terror

16 Aug 2007 The Real Issue In 2008