creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Matt Towery
Matt Towery
16 Feb 2012
For Gingrich It Is Arizona and Georgia or ...

Just three weeks earlier, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich was sailing high. He won the South Carolina … Read More.

26 Jan 2012
GOP Race for Presidential Nomination May Be Decided in Jacksonville

Never before have debates in the primary/caucus season ever meant so much to the final outcome of the vote … Read More.

19 Jan 2012
Regardless of Who Becomes GOP Nominee, Party and Candidates are Failing the Faithful

After years as an officeholder, strategist, pollster, you name it, I have truly come to despise politicians. … Read More.

Handwritten Bush Letter Disproves One Myth, Hints at Others That Might Be Disproved

Share Comment

It has been basically a known fact among the media that George W. Bush does not care for reading newspapers or the barrage of opinion columns that now seem omnipresent in this age of the Internet media. I really can't blame him.

So when in early December I wrote a "Dear Mr. President" for my national Creators Syndicate column about what a great First Lady Laura Bush has been, I did so noting that it was merely a vehicle for making my point. After all, Bush doesn't read media, right?

Wrong. Really wrong. Last week, I received a handwritten letter from President Bush expressing his thanks.

It's poor form to disclose any communication with a sitting president. And I don't want to exploit what was clearly a very kind gesture by the president. My purpose here is to reflect on what other possible myths and misconceptions we in media (and we across America) may have about this soon-to-be ex-president.

Bush made it clear to me in the letter that editorial columns do reach the Oval Office and that he does read many of them. So that myth is broken.

But what about the general perception that he has been a president unwilling to do things any way but his own? That he's a president unwilling to admit mistakes or change course?

In some very revealing interviews during his last weeks as president, Bush has made it clear that the intelligence he was given on weapons of mass destruction was in large measure wrong. That's a bold and introspective comment coming from a man who, understandably, would seek justification for the war in Iraq.

Now is the time for those who have been critical of the Bush Administration — at times, myself among them — to question ourselves: Did President Bush fail this nation, or did those tasked with serving him and the nation fail in their own right?

For example, it wasn't George Bush's desire to turn a blind eye to the events surrounding Hurricane Katrina. Instead, he was let down by those he relied upon to provide him with the accurate information needed to properly respond to the catastrophe. By the time Bush realized their shortcomings, it was too late.

On the housing market crisis, representatives of the Bush administration pleaded with lawmakers to rein in Fannie Mae and Freddy Mac long before things got out of hand.

You should read the transcripts and hear the words of members of Congress as they mouthed off and stereotyped those giving warnings from the Bush Administration as being both generally misguided and downright racist.

And when the nation's financial institutions were crumbling, I am convinced that only President Bush really understood the emergency need for action to stabilize the situation. In his typical droll style, he warned leaders that "this sucker might go down."

Liquidity was freezing up, but more importantly, confidence in our nation's financial institutions was declining so quickly that most of them would have lost almost all of their investors had not drastic action been taken. You can bet Barack Obama knows that now. It is clear through his comments.

Has the bailout been implemented properly? I made my thoughts clear about that in my last column. But again, the point is that a president delegates duties to those he trusts. If they choose to operate in a secretive and ineffective manner, then it is they who have failed, and not the president.

As a pollster, I can't honestly write a column saying that George W. Bush is now viewed as a successful president. What I can say is that many of the current concepts we have about this president may prove, as time passes, to have been incorrect.

One thing I do know is that since 9/11, no major act of terrorism has happened on American soil. I am guessing we will come to learn just how hard the president worked to keep the nation safe. And President-elect Obama recently said that this is the most important priority for a president.

Every time I have written a column even slightly kind toward President Bush, I have been bled to death with the cuts of a thousand objecting e-mails, often from conservatives who normally agree with my opinions.

So I'll end with a simple public response to President Bush's kind letter and say, "Thank you, Mr. President." And as years pass by, it's my guess we might be thanking George Bush more than we can imagine today. Not for any letter he's written, but for his service to our nation. Time will judge.

Matt Towery served as the chairman of former Speaker Newt Gingrich's political organization from 1992 until Gingrich left Congress. He is a former Georgia state representative, the author of several books, including his newest, "Paranoid Nation: The Real Story of the 2008 Fight for the Presidency," and currently heads the polling and political information firm InsiderAdvantage. To find out more about Matthew Towery and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2008 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.


Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment
I live in Texas and have been a supporter of Bush from day-one so don't take me wrong here. You said several times it was not Bush who let the nation down, "he was let down by those he relied upon to provide him with accurate information...." That's no doubt very true but it does not absolve Bush. As a leader, he is responsible for what his administration does and does not do, period. If you give him credit for the good things, he also gets the blame for the bad things, and the nation has been let down in several ways. Not that anyone else would have done any better. I just wished he had shown more backbone when dealing with the media and the democrats. He lets people walk over him. Had he been more forceful and set the record straight from time-to-time, he would have a better reputation, and higher poll numbers, today. He'll still do fine historically.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Larry Reams
Wed Jan 14, 2009 2:09 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Matt Towery
Feb. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 31 1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Ray Hanania
Ray HananiaUpdated 16 Feb 2012
Larry Elder
Larry ElderUpdated 16 Feb 2012
Joe Conason
Joe ConasonUpdated 16 Feb 2012

31 Mar 2011 Fight Over Florida Early Primary More Important Than Most Realize

22 Feb 2008 What Some Might Not Know About McCain's 'Story'

25 Jun 2009 Critical "Swing" States Appear to Oppose Healthcare Proposals