creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Matt Towery
Matt Towery
24 May 2012
Why Rubio for Vice President Makes Sense

Yes, this column is based out of Florida, so it would seem that an opinion piece suggesting that Marco Rubio … Read More.

17 May 2012
A Cash-strapped Battle for Florida's Senate Seat

Many decades ago as a young punk working in Washington, I was given the job of teaching public speaking and … Read More.

10 May 2012
Lugar Defeat Sends Many Messages

The defeat of Indiana Sen. Richard Lugar has political tongues wagging all over the nation. Lugar was a major … Read More.

Catholic Church Needs To "Redshirt" Priests

Share Comment

As a Roman Catholic, I have heard more than the usual share of other Catholics expressing frustration about the Church's handling of what seems to be a never-ending controversy. Great harm has come to some young people who have been the victims of molestation and similar behavior by a small percentage of priests.

No amount of public relations, particularly the bungled job coming out of the Vatican, could possibly solve what has been an ongoing string of controversies that is now starting to give Catholicism across the world a black eye. I understand that I am hitting very touchy ground in what I am about to propose. I take comfort in knowing that the Church has, in essence, already been dabbling with a form of my idea.

In American college athletics, such as football, it has become common practice to "redshirt" many promising new players, usually first-year players. That means allowing them to practice with the team and learn the plays; in essence, to do everything except participate in even one play in a game. Then they have four more years of eligibility in which to compete in regulation games.

The secret that most Americans and most Catholics don't know is that the Church has, since Pope John Paul II, started to allow — particularly among Episcopal priests — the "redshirting" of those who want to become priests in the Roman Church. They first enter the Episcopal Church as priests. They are either already married or are planning to get married, as that particular faith allows among its clergy. These priests basically follow the Anglican version of much of the Catholic religion, but may then begin to crave the other "Roman" aspects that are so characteristic of the Catholic Church.

Following the "redshirt years" of these married Anglicans, the Roman Church, through an exception made by the Vatican, allows them to become Catholic priests. While I'm sure this constitutes a small percentage of Catholic priests, it should also be known that deacons in the Church, who often perform many of the tasks that priests once did, are also allowed to marry.

I am not a rebel within my church.

In fact, I enjoy the more conservative interpretation of the scriptures. But we now live in an age when even the purest of heart are barraged by media with sexually charged material, or at least subliminally stimulating images and ideas about sex. This extends from entertainment all the way into everyday conversations.

It has now reached the point that the Church must confront the inevitable. Its demands of celibacy and unmarried church careers for its priests and others no longer constitute a tenable interpretation of the scriptures in the modern world. This may well result in a Church that refuses to face the devastating consequences of sexually frustrated clergy; a clergy that contains some who, try as they might, end up falling prey to temptation by trying to quench their natural passions by exploiting those most conveniently under their control — children.

It's time for the Church to start addressing the cause that keeps this controversy alive year after year. An immediate move by the Catholic Church to allow priests to marry is not in the cards. I believe it will eventually happen, or the Church will just as eventually whither in influence, by dint of fear and loathing from the world, including from more and more of its own Church members.

In the interim, perhaps those wanting to enter the priesthood, and who have a normal attraction to adults of the opposite sex, could first enter a Roman Catholic version of what some other churches now offer. Later they could become full-fledged Catholic priests.

My guess is that a "redshirt" program would fill up as fully as a football stadium. And whatever logic the Church used to make exceptions for the currently married priests wanting into the Roman priesthood could eventually be applied more universally.

The current apologies and poorly attempted excuses by the Catholic Church are running thin, even with many Catholics. It's likely time for the Church to become creative in dealing with the root cause of a never-ending stream of repeat sexual offenses.

Matt Towery is author of the new book, "Paranoid Nation: The Real Story of the 2009 Fight for the Presidency." He heads the polling and political information firm InsiderAdvantage. To find out more about Matthew Towery and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2010 CREATORS.COM


Comments

2 Comments | Post Comment
As a former seminarian and friend to many priests- many strong, and some who have failed in horrific ways, I am a little surprised by this article. Its main argument is that priestly pedophilia has any connection to celibacy. The logic is old, tired, and makes no sense. Plus - it is intellectually lazy. The percentage of pedophiles that are married is higher than pedophilia in the priesthood. If a man is attracted to adult women - he will not suddenly become attracted to little boys or girls because of his choice to dedicate himself to celibacy. If it were simply a matter of sexual repression or urges - why do so many married coaches, teachers, and ministers abuse children?

Pedophilia is a disease, and affliction of the mind, body, and soul. Many pedophiles are narcissistic, manipulative, and sociopaths. They excel at learning how to beat tests designed to identify the tendencies. They prey on the weak, the lost, and the needy. The cater to parents who want there children to have a good influence, but sometimes let reason fail. They are predators - sneaky, intelligent, and dangerous.

The priesthood has attracted pedophiles for many generations - as have other occupations that provide trusted access to children who may be easily manipulated. In the 60's - in the thralls of the sexual revolution and the upheaval of VII - many seminaries were overrun by left thinking liberals eager to free themselves and those in their charge from what they viewed as an outdated model of Christianity. They turned away from Christ and the Church. The leaders were overwhelmed in a way they could not perceive. They trusted the experts of the day who time and again denied the idea of sexual predator and counseled them to simply move priests. The Church has learned - but unlike other institutions - who are let off the hook due to statutes of limitations - the Church is badgered because they dare to believe that we can master our sexuality. Many priests failed - with horrific results. The Church must purge and learn. They must find a way to help and encourage the victims. However, it is unfair and unreasonable to charge the Church based on information that was not available at the time - namely the idea of a sexual predator.

Married priests will not necessarily lower the number of pedophiles in the ranks o the priesthood. Vigilance in the seminaries, and in the parishes will help with this. Encouragement to those who take this heavy yolk will help.

But I for one think it is better that we only have 1 priest who is willing to make the ultimate sacrifice of personal, earthly fulfillment in the desire to take up the cross than a billion priests who accept the cross conditionally.
Comment: #1
Posted by: Andrew McEnroe
Thu Apr 1, 2010 6:34 AM
Andrew, I couldn't agree more. Thank you for your thoughtful post. I would like to add that, contrary to popular belief about homosexuality, homosexuals are statistically less likely to sexually abuse children than heterosexuals. Pedophilia is not an expression of a person's sexuality; it is a horrible corruption of it. Many pedophiles were sexually abused as children themselves; all pedophiles failed to learn real empathy for other people and to learn to respect boundaries. They are only able (or willing) to consider their own gratification, and they prey on the most vulnerable among us because they make it very easy for pedophiles to get that gratification.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Carla
Thu Apr 1, 2010 12:51 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Matt Towery
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Roland Martin
Roland S. MartinUpdated 20 Jun 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 27 May 2012

1 Mar 2007 Bad Legislation: A Real Nightmare

9 Jul 2009 While King of Pop Is Memorialized, Seven Lonely Caskets Return From Afghanistan

24 Sep 2009 GOP Return to Power Could Be Swift