creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Matt Towery
Matt Towery
18 Mar 2010
Inappropriate Portrayal of First Lady Benefits No One

In early March, the head of the Tennessee and Greater Nashville hospitality associations sent an email to a … Read More.

11 Mar 2010
Crist-Rubio Battle Now the Bellwether for Direction of GOP in 2010

I knew that I must have been off pretty badly when I casually wrote in this national column that Florida Gov. … Read More.

5 Mar 2010
Not One Major Poll Favors Obama's Health Proposal

In my entire career, I have never been as confounded as I am over President Obama and the Democratic leadership'… Read More.

Arlen Specter and Other Magic Bullets Aimed at the GOP

As many know, it was an ambitious lawyer named Arlen Specter, working on the Warren Commission inquiry into the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, who is credited with having conceived of the "single bullet" theory that somehow established that Kennedy's only assailant was Lee Harvey Oswald.

The theory has been termed by skeptics as the "magic bullet" theory. Those critics portray that bullet as having curved, spun and changed directions on its way to Kennedy's head. That's the only way, they say, that Oswald alone could have killed him.

Now Specter has become a living personification of his single bullet theory, this one aimed at the Republican Party, and "fired" when Specter switched to the Democratic side of the U.S. Senate. The GOP faces many other potentially mortal magic political bullets.

Combined with the likely eventual seating of funny man and soon-to-be U.S. Sen. Al Franken, Specter's bullet will have delivered on many issues a filibuster-proof Senate. And with that filibuster goes the last morsel of power the Republicans had in Congress.

No matter how hard they deny it, Republicans must face the fact that Barack Obama has high approval ratings after his first 100 days in office.

Moreover, the Democratic Congress has essentially taken the emergency economic actions started under President Bush and somehow managed to now have government owning banks, insurance companies and car manufacturers. (And in the case of the automakers, the potential owners are both government and unions.)

The same Congressional majority has proposed an almost incomprehensible mountain of debt. As a result, they are scaring the daylights out of core conservatives and some independent voters.

But it does no good to be convinced a ship is sinking if most of the other passengers are dancing on the decks and toasting the captain. Most Americans see stimulus efforts and government intervention as being proactive fixes to what ails America, rather than the start of a slippery slope toward socialism.

There are other magic bullets besides Arlen Specter in the Democrats' bandolier, and they're using them shrewdly. For one, no one likes credit card companies, not even the so-called rich.

So the Obama administration is going after them at quick speed. That's a shiny bullet that only makes him more popular.

And in tough economic times, it's only natural for people to resent those who've received huge pay bonuses, or who fly in private jets. So, given the mandate that was actually created in the last months of the Bush administration, the Obama team and the Democrats in Congress are now aggressively targeting excessive bonuses, lavish lifestyles and other over-the-top actions by executives whose companies received bailout funds. Many conservatives see this as an even deeper extension of government into the private sector, and an even stronger effort at promoting class envy.

But most Americans aren't consumed with the issue of government intruding into free enterprise. They want to see anyone who appears to have been rewarded for "failure" punished. Voila — another magic bullet that only adds to Obama's popularity.

Obviously the press is still enamored with the new style of this president and first lady. Again, that's a fact that can be cursed all day long, but is not likely to change anytime soon.

The truth is that the Republican Party is reeling and there appears to be no immediate hope that it can steady itself, much less launch a new offensive that has much of a prayer of being effective. Explaining why tax cuts are good really doesn't matter when, because of our system of withholding taxes from paychecks, polls show that most Americans don't even know how much they pay in income taxes, and a near majority in surveys say, "I didn't pay anything" or "I received a refund."

These are cold, hard facts that most Republicans and conservatives don't want to hear. But as a pollster who must be completely objective when polling, let me assure you they are all true.

After suffering wounds from various magic bullets, a patient must be X-rayed and thoroughly examined to determine what, if anything, can be done to save his or her life.

It's time for the GOP to understand that until it properly diagnoses why it's slowly losing its lifeblood, it's likely to keep losing its pulse. Only after the diagnosis is made and new blood is pumped into the Republican Party will it perhaps start to find some magic bullets of its own.

Matt Towery is author of the new book, "Paranoid Nation: The Real Story of the 2009 Fight for the Presidency." He heads the polling and political information firm InsiderAdvantage. To find out more about Matthew Towery and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com.

COPYRIGHT 2009 CREATORS SYNDICATE, INC.



Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment

My jaw dropped when I read in your column that polls show that a near majority of Americans think they don"t pay any taxes or think that because they get a refund they think got their taxes back . (That's what you seemed to imply.) I have NEVER heard ANYONE with a job say that's what they thought. And I've lived in three states among highly diversifed populations. Who the heck was polled? People with a first grade education or those on Welfare? I have never thought too highly of polls, and this is why. The results are so often ridiculous that it seems pollsters must make them up, or skew their results by the type of people or questions asked despite protestations of objectivity. This must be true when you see the totally different results among TV news polls. They cannot all be right. One other thing, when talking about people wanting to see anyone punished for being rewarded for failure in the big corporations, you put the word failure in quotation marks as if failure was not what they did and reward was not what they received. If a company does not at least maintain the status quo, but actually lost amazing amounts of money, would you not say that is failure without quotation marks? Besides the fact that no one on the planet who has not found the cure for all diseases, managed to feed the entire population of the world healthy food, and has created total peace in the whole world is worthy of making more than a $1,000,000 including perks and benefits (and I am being generous here), no one who allows a corporation to do a freefall should get any salary and certainly no exit benefits and pension. Needless to say, I hope, those people should be fired immediately. How can anyone who does this be considered one of those people that corporations are always saying they need to obscenely reward in order to keep these or acquire these smart, good people? How smart and good can they be when they fail so miserably? There's probably millions who could fail equally well for less money and benefits. There are probably thousands who could keep a company profitable as well for less money and benefits. Please don't put failure in quotation marks when talking about these greedy, subhuman creatures who are laughing over the pot of gold they were rewarded.

Comment: #1
Posted by: cynthia tracey
Mon May 4, 2009 12:52 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:
Creators.com comments policy
More
Matt Towery
Mar. `10
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
28 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31 1 2 3
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Author’s Podcast
Mark Shields
Mark ShieldsUpdated 20 Mar 2010
Bill O'Reilly
Bill O'ReillyUpdated 20 Mar 2010
Andy Borowitz
Andy BorowitzUpdated 20 Mar 2010

5 Nov 2009 Mr. Boortz's Opus: Why Talk Radio Really Matters

7 Jan 2010 Conservative Bloggers Will Play Huge Role in Coming GOP Contests

19 Apr 2007 Here Comes Trouble