creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Mark Shields
Mark Shields
9 Aug 2014
A Poll Apart

A long time ago, maybe in the first Eisenhower administration, my precinct committeewoman taught me the … Read More.

2 Aug 2014
Nixon's 'Gift'

The U.S. Supreme Court, including former President Richard Nixon's own appointees, ruled 8-0 that Nixon must … Read More.

26 Jul 2014
Guns in the Workplace, NOT for Pro-Gun Politicians

Its official title is the "Safe Carry Protection Act," and when it was signed by Georgia's Republican Gov. … Read More.

Winning the "March Madness" Office Pool

Comment

Do not bother to tell me even if forensic historians incontrovertibly prove by DNA that Thomas Jefferson, when he authored the Declaration of Independence, was under the influence of performance-enhancing pharmaceuticals. Not this week, thank you. This is the opening of "March Madness," when 65 men's college basketball teams begin the play-off tournament that will eventually determine one national champion. More importantly, it is when just about the whole country seems to be consumed with the "office pool" and trying to predict the winner.

The "office pool" is more than a celebration of spring. It is close to being a totally shared national experience. In businesses and institutions across the continent, co-workers and colleagues spend countless hours making their picks — or, more accurately, their guesses, investing a few dollars and then rooting for teams from schools the campuses of which they could not find on a map with the help of Google.

In hopes of saving my gentle readers countless hours of researching the teams and players in this year's tourney, I offer a few simple guidelines for winning the respect of your colleagues, if not the pool, itself.

1) When in doubt in choosing between two teams, pick the team that competes all season in the tougher conference. For example, the Big East Conference and the Atlantic Coast Conference are much tougher conferences than are the Big South Conference and the Ivy League. Generally speaking, if a conference has five or more of its teams in the national tournament, then it is stronger than the conference that only has one team in the dance.

2) Favorites are favorites for a reason: That reason is that favorites win more often than do underdogs. Still, in the first round of the tournament No. 10 seeds often do defeat No. 7 seeds. It's not a crazy idea to pick a No. 12 seed in that first round.

3) Do not get carried away with upsets. In the entire history of these national basketball tournaments, no team seeded eighth or lower has ever won the championship.

4) If you're still stumped, make your picks (guesses) based upon the originality, appeal or humor of the schools' basketball mascot.

If this were the sole, determining criterion, a number of teams that will not be asked to the tournament would be the overwhelming favorites, beginning with my personal pet mascot, the University of California at Santa Cruz's banana slug.

Nothing racially or ethnically offensive. No gratuitous violence. The banana slug was chosen, let it be noted, in a campus-wide referendum at the university and succeeded the sea lion.

For a real team mascot brimming with energy and enthusiasm, none can really compete with the Hawk of St. Joseph University in Philadelphia. It's not the outfit, which is fine. It is that the St. Joe's Hawk NEVER stops flapping its wings, or arms, from the beginning of the game until the end. Literally the Hawk's wings are flapped thousands of times in a two-hour game.

But here are the outstanding mascots of teams in the 2009 tournament:

a) Otto the Orange of Syracuse University. Literally a round orange — with human legs and a little Syracuse cap on top. A more chunky earlier model basically covered the legs with his costume, creating a striking resemblance to the huge fruit. In defiance of mascots and cheerleaders who perform cartwheels or make human pyramids, the laid-back orange often just rolls on the floor.

b) The West Virginia Mountaineer. A student, selected on the basis of class performance, among other factors, dressed in coonskin hat, sporting a beard and carrying a long rifle. It works for West Virginia University.

c) Chief Osceola of Florida State University. A fierce Seminole brave ready for real conflict whose existence has been officially sanctioned as not being offensive by Florida's Seminole tribe.

d) Western Kentucky University's Big Red, which is a huge red blob that looks like it might be the issue of an illicit union between PBS's Clifford and the architects and engineers that produce Macy's Thanksgiving Day parade. Still, Big Red is likable.

e) Wake Forest University's Demon Deacon, which qualifies on the basis of creative contradictions. This historically Southern Baptist school, long before there was a Jimmy Swaggart or a Jim Bakker or a Father Geoghan, had its own Elmer Gantry mascot. I like him.

There you have the keys to the office pool and your sanity in "March Madness." Don't take my picks. Look those mascots over, and then make your own choices. Good luck.

To find out more about Mark Shields and read his past columns, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.

DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.

COPYRIGHT 2009 MARK SHIELDS



Comments

1 Comments | Post Comment
Sir;....If I would have to bet on anything, it would be on the unexpected become reality... I watched your performance on the News Hour, and in regard to Charles Freedman, the result was not unexpected; and the issue reminds me of the statment that just because you are paranoid does not mean they are not out to get you... I think the man belongs in our pantheon of heroes for daring to say anything was amiss in our relationship with Israel... Such courage borders on foolishness, but he has received his reward... He said the Israel Lobby is too powerful...It does not matter what you believe, or what I believe, but seeing that will certainly make some believe that the Israel Lobby is too powerful if they can decide who we will have in sensitive positions... Who do they want in our sensitive positions??? Is it some one insensitive to reality??? I think Israel can do this because they can play upon the anti-democratic nature of our government where our too few representatives are too easily bought.... We should increase their number to dilute the effect of alien money, and we should go on increasing their number until the value of their virtue exceeds the going price...God forbid that we should have democracy, and that the people would ever have to be convinced that the support of Israel, and blindness to her crimes was in the best interest of our lives, and of our eternal souls.... The protestants who are not far removed from the Jews would easily support them, but that hardly counts as the common man.... And I suppose democracy is the true danger to Israel, and they know it; that the common man will get control over his own affairs and say: What is in this for me??? Surely, we might well rationally conceive a benefit to having a loaded gun like Israel aimed at the entire Middle East.... I trust the Middle East is growing tired of such high handedness... Morally, I do not think we can justify the further support of Israel...They have played the victim even while they have become the criminal...It is getting very old...Thanks...Sweeney
Comment: #1
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Sat Mar 14, 2009 5:12 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Mark Shields
Aug. `14
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Ray Hanania
Ray HananiaUpdated 28 Aug 2014
Jill Lawrence
Jill LawrenceUpdated 28 Aug 2014
Froma Harrop
Froma HarropUpdated 28 Aug 2014

25 Jun 2011 You Can Choose Your Friends

17 Aug 2013 The Rolex Gene

11 Jun 2011 A Minimum Level of Likeability