opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Mark Shields
Mark Shields
6 Feb 2016
Cracking the Code of Campaign-Speak

"Do you ever get the feeling," asked humorist Robert Orben, "that the only reason we have elections is to … Read More.

30 Jan 2016
Is There Only One True Progressive?

Mark Shields is off this week. The following is a column by Joe Conason. In our polarized politics, the … Read More.

23 Jan 2016
The Man Who Drowned Democracy With 'Sewer Money'

Mark Shields is off this week. The following is a column by Joe Conason. This week marked the anniversary of … Read More.

Will John McCain Be the Hubert Humphrey of 2008?


If you are lucky enough to cover American politics, then, inevitably, you personally find yourself liking some political candidates more than you do others. None of us is objective. Most of us, I still believe, do try to be fair. I frankly admit — even though I disagree with him on literally dozens of political issues — that I personally like and admire U.S. Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., who from all available evidence is running quite hard for the 2008 Republican presidential nomination.

George W. Bush has had no more reliable, credible and important supporter of his Iraq war policy than McCain. Lately, I have reluctantly begun to think that McCain risks becoming in 2008 the Vice President Hubert Humphrey of 1968.

In 1968 — long before I became a semi-respectable columnist — I worked for New York Sen. Robert Kennedy in his challenger presidential campaign. The favorite of most Democratic Party leaders that year, as well as of many voters, was the admirable and likeable Hubert Humphrey. The country was openly divided over the increasing American and civilian casualties from the unpopular war in Vietnam.

Humphrey won the nomination, and — because Vietnam was in the final analysis for him, I believe, a matter of conscience — he continued to be loyal to the war policies of his Democratic president, Lyndon Johnson. That support and that loyalty in the close election of 1968 quite probably cost Hubert Humphrey the White House.

Now consider the nation's mood, less than a year before the first contest in the 2008 presidential campaign.

American voters have essentially delivered their judgment on both the presidency of George W. Bush and the U.S. war in Iraq: Neither is working the way it was supposed to, and the electorate holds the failure of the former responsible for the tragic failure that is the latter.

If you need evidence for the above statement, just reflect on the answer to one question in the most recent Wall Street Journal-NBC News poll: "Thinking about events of the past couple months, do you feel that President Bush is facing a short-term setback from which things are likely to get better for him, or that he is facing a longer-term setback from which things are unlikely to get better for him?" Just 25 percent of respondents see things getting better for Bush after this "temporary" setback, while a super-majority, 65 percent of voters, believe the president is confronting a "longer-term" setback from which things are "unlikely" to get better for him.

The 2006 election disaster for his Republican Party marked the functional end of George W. Bush's presidency.

McCain has never hesitated to take on his own president. As one of only six Republican insurgents in the Senate who stopped Bush's energy bill, McCain won no friends at the White House by branding the legislation as "no policy alternatives, just one pork-barrel project larded onto another" and, my personal favorite, the "leave no lobbyist behind bill."

Long before the president became a last-minute convert to the cause, McCain was angering Detroit, the Bush administration and conservatives by championing — always working closely with prominent Senate Democrats — legislation to require all light trucks and cars to get 36 miles a gallon and to reduce global warming and other greenhouse gases from industrial smokestacks. He has been a nemesis of deficit spending.

Make no mistake. John McCain did not become the front-runner for the GOP presidential nomination by accident. He is good at politics. And he knows that the U.S. war in Iraq — the conduct of which by this Republican administration he has frequently criticized, but the mission of which he has so strongly backed — has lost public support.

McCain knows well that his support for Iraq could cost him his last chance to win the presidency.

But don't look for McCain to change. You see, with him it is a matter of conscience.

To find out more about Mark Shields and read his past columns, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at




0 Comments | Post Comment
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right: comments policy
Mark Shields
Feb. `16
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
31 1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 1 2 3 4 5
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Veronique de RugyUpdated 11 Feb 2016
Matt Towery
Matt ToweryUpdated 11 Feb 2016
Froma Harrop
Froma HarropUpdated 11 Feb 2016

6 Jun 2013 Washington and the Von Moltke Grid

17 Apr 2010 Heretics or Converts: Democrats Better Decide

10 Feb 2011 For Obama, the Road to Re-Election Does Not Go Through Cairo