creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Mark Shields
Mark Shields
19 May 2012
A Price Tag on Patriotism

Will Rogers was wrong. The legendary humorist, speaking of the responsibilities each of us has as a citizen … Read More.

12 May 2012
Shortcuts for 2012 Campaign

Please accept the following as a small token of appreciation from your semi-faithful correspondent, who knows … Read More.

5 May 2012
Slinging Mud

Indiana Republican Gov. Mitch Daniels was characteristically candid when speaking to the Indianapolis Star's … Read More.

Welcome to the U.S.A.!

Share Comment

Just about all of us know — and most of us begrudgingly accept — that the powerful, the affluent and the well-connected receive much more solicitous and preferential treatment than the rest of us do from maitre d's, public officials and college admissions officers. Too often, as we have been told, it really is not what you know, but instead who you know and who knows you.

That's not the way things are supposed to be here in America, where we have spilled a lot of blood to ensure equality before the law for all.

Let me state upfront: I do not know beyond what I have read in the papers about the former International Monetary Fund chief and, until recently, perhaps the next president of France, Dominique Strauss-Kahn, who has been indicted by a New York grand jury on seven counts — including the felonies of attempted rape and sexual abuse — of attacking a maid at a Manhattan hotel.

What we do know is that he, the Frenchman, 62, has power, wealth and a ton of global influence. By contrast, she, an immigrant from Africa, is the 32-year-old single mother of a 15-year-old girl.

While we do not know for certain what happened in Strauss-Kahn's $3,000 a night suite in the Sofitel on the morning of May 14, we do know that this is not about American Puritanism concerning the sex lives of public men versus the Europeans' sophisticated acceptance of randy playboys in high office.

No, what this case is about is not romance or infidelity or even about sex.. It is about the alleged violence used by an immensely powerful man against a literally powerless woman.

In high-stakes politics, power is less often an aphrodisiac than it is a blunt instrument. Power too frequently is accompanied by a sense of entitlement by which the power-wielders feel free to exploit, to abuse, to take advantage of individuals who are relatively vulnerable and powerless.

In Washington, the exploited or abused individual could be an employee, a staff assistant or an intern — anyone over whom the powerful individual, either male or female, can hold the nuclear threat of dismissal or a negative reference.

What the Sofitel case does prove is that, first, the hotel authorities and then, more crucially, the New York police officers were willing to follow the evidence and to take the word of a hotel housekeeper — with no clout, no money and no friends in high places — and to act forcefully against a man with presidents on his speed-dial, a personal fortune and close friends in the highest reaches of world power.

This may well be an example of life imitating art — the art of TV's "Law and Order: Special Victims Unit," which tells the stories ("ripped from the headlines") of New York police officers investigating and prosecuting, without fear or favor, the sometimes well-connected perpetrators of sexually based crimes.

The whole sorry case — which will permanently change, and probably not for the better, the lives of so many people — does have one positive message. In the United States, in New York City in the spring of 2011, the police and the district attorney were willing to stand for true equality before the law. And that is the U.S.A.

To find out more about Mark Shields and read his past columns, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.

DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM

COPYRIGHT 2011 MARK SHIELDS


Comments

3 Comments | Post Comment
Yes, it is.
Comment: #1
Posted by: David Henricks
Fri May 20, 2011 10:14 PM
well put Mark.
Comment: #2
Posted by: Charles
Sat May 21, 2011 7:20 AM
Sir;... I don't want to say what happened... And it is certain that I do not know... I am as guilty as anyone of brown nosing the Rich, some times right down to my shoulders... Objectively, we confuse wealth with honor... No Native American could have ever made a claim of honor wihtout reference to his deeds of valor, but when some one is rich the presumption is that their wealth is honorable without proof to the contrary... The difference is, that an honorable man brings honor to his community and does not take honor from them... But the rich are rich because their communities are poor... Isn't that what Montaigne showed, that the profit of one man is the loss of another??? We all suffer societies in which the gathering rich means a storm of increasing poverty; and it would be nice if all the suffering and not simply the rapes were born by dark skinned third worlders... The fact is, that they can take no more, and now it is time for all people everywhere to feed the pleasures of the rich, to assume the position of slave with masters and submit... Let me ask Mr. Shields: What was that woman doing here??? Was she not serving, and was she not serving because Whites of European decent have not yet learned to be servile, and must taught??? We do not yet jump when the boss barks, so we are replaced with brown skinned immigrants, who must be used to it because slavery was survival to them... You see; we could not export slavery without some day importing it... We could not justify injustice for them without justifying injustice for ourselves... If you find out why that woman was in America you will find the International Monetary Fund had a great deal to do with it... When money is loaned to poor countries to capitalize them, to build infrastructure, or to fund their militaries and police; it is their people who must pay it back with ever greater slavery and sacrifice... We don't do anyone any favors... We shit ourselves about being altruistic, but in reality our rich give money to the world only to get it back with interest, and part of what they buy in the bargain is world slavery that does not even exclude us... Whether that Mr. Strauss-Kahn is guilty of this crime is irrelevent to the deeds he is most certainly guilty of; and that is of enslaving the world through banking rather than colonializtion...Those people cannot suffer and sacrifice alone... We must all suffer with them before anything will change... What ever else becomes of the Gentleman charged, he must now have some sympathy for the entire world which could more easily shake free of its fetters than he could be free of his...As much as I love the rich, and think they are individually fine people; still, there is not a single one of them that death would not improve... They do not understand how immoral is wealth, and what its true consequences are... Such blindness can only be willful, and should be punished.. Thanks... Sweeney
Comment: #3
Posted by: James A, Sweeney
Sat May 21, 2011 7:20 AM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Mark Shields
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Roland Martin
Roland S. MartinUpdated 20 Jun 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 27 May 2012

11 Oct 2008 Offering Voters a Hot Fudge Sundae Diet

3 May 2008 Could This Be 1924 All Over Again?

3 Feb 2007 There Really WAS Something About Mary