creators.com opinion web
Liberal Opinion Conservative Opinion
Mark Shields
Mark Shields
19 May 2012
A Price Tag on Patriotism

Will Rogers was wrong. The legendary humorist, speaking of the responsibilities each of us has as a citizen … Read More.

12 May 2012
Shortcuts for 2012 Campaign

Please accept the following as a small token of appreciation from your semi-faithful correspondent, who knows … Read More.

5 May 2012
Slinging Mud

Indiana Republican Gov. Mitch Daniels was characteristically candid when speaking to the Indianapolis Star's … Read More.

Labor's Pains 2011

Share Comment

During the showdown in Wisconsin, Republican Gov. Scott Walker's determination to repeal collective bargaining rights of state employees has led to open conflict with those employees and the unions that represent them. My conservative friends argue that unions now make sense in the private sector, where employers are powerful and rich, but do not make sense in the public sector, where the "employers" are average citizens like Joe Six-Pack.

This very recent conservative conversion to the cause of unions — whose depleted ranks now represent barely one out of 12 private-sector workers, with their political muscle having shrunk correspondingly — represents a complete U-turn from barely a generation ago, when labor unions — then representing better than one out of three private-sector workers — constituted, according to conservative doctrine, a mortal threat to both American democracy and our free enterprise system.

Let us stipulate that American labor unions are flawed, imperfect institutions (not unlike American businesses) run by flawed, imperfect individuals. Then we can also agree that history makes unmistakably clear that without the energy, passion and political clout of organized labor, United States workers would not have had an eight-hour work day, a five-day work week, a minimum-wage law, paid vacations, health and retirement benefits, child-labor laws or health and safety standards in the workplace.

Because of the ripple effect of labor contracts raising the hourly wages of their members, non-union employees benefited with bigger paychecks and benefits. The rise of the American middle class in the postwar era was largely the product of the GI Bill and organized labor.

If you believe, as I do, that every worker is entitled to a just wage and a working environment that does not threaten her physical health or moral integrity, as well as to a pension and insurance for old age and sickness, then chances are that you agree with Catholic social teaching that workers have the right to form and join unions to secure these fundamental rights.

Unions at their best can be instruments of solidarity.

At their worst, corrupt unions can exploit and sell out the interests of their own members, abet criminal activity and damage the larger community.

Which brings us to 2011 and Wisconsin — where, like all Americans, workers in the private sector have taken a major economic hit. Between 1979 and 2009, the median hourly wage of the working American man actually fell by 2 percent. During those three decades, according to the reliable, if pro-worker, Economic Policy Institute, the nation's productivity — the expansion of the whole economic pie — increased by 80 percent.

Where did it go? The bottom 90 percent of American earners together were rewarded with just 16 percent of the economic benefits, while the top 1 percent collected 56 percent of all the economic prize and the top tenth of that most fortunate 1 percent — approximately 129,712 privileged princes — cornered 34 percent of all the economic growth, or more than twice as much as the bottom 117 million-plus collectively earned.

Does it surprise you that this gaping economic disparity between the Incredibly Rich and the Rest of Us has exploded during an era when labor has basically been excluded from national economic policymaking? It shouldn't. Organized labor frankly has been less than inept in making any public case for its own existence, let alone for the cause of its membership.

Nor should it surprise anyone that hurting Wisconsin citizens who feel their own economic security and futures under assault could be vulnerable to a specious argument that it's somehow the fault of nurses, teachers, librarians, social workers and other public employees.

Understand that Wisconsin is nothing less than ground zero in the battle to strip American workers of their right to bargain collectively with their employers.

To find out more about Mark Shields and read his past columns, visit the Creators Syndicate web page at www.creators.com.

DISTRIBUTED BY CREATORS.COM

COPYRIGHT 2011 MARK SHIELDS


Comments

5 Comments | Post Comment
Dear Mark,

Thank you for being a voice of enlightenment and for reminding people about the positive things that unions have wrought!

Ben Friedman
Comment: #1
Posted by: Ben Friedman
Fri Feb 25, 2011 4:56 PM
Mark, Thank you for finally writing about the actual fall of wages of the American worker from 1979 to 2009. I have been waiting for someone to bring that up in all of these debates. Hearing it tonight on PBS Newshour was long overdue also. Unfortunately, this truth was brushed aside by David Brooks, so I would ask you to repeat it every time the topic of union busting comes up. The other truth that needs to be brought out (over and over apparently) is that many public sector employees pay into their pensions. These monies are not coming from the taxpayer. And perhaps even more importantly, wage gains were given up in order to have better pensions and better insurance packages. I voted over and over for benefits rather than wages, and we were under a wage and benefit cap for years in Wisconsin, so we were never going to get rich through collective bargaining. What a joke. Susan Daugherty, Retired School Librarian
Comment: #2
Posted by: Susan
Fri Feb 25, 2011 5:21 PM
Mark: Except for me everyone has feet of clay. Those with power,unions in the 60s, 70's and 80's, management now, always exceed the reasonable performance required. Lord Acton's power corrupts etc says it all. The greed and brutality of human beings is frightening and permanent. Gov. Walkers intransigence will defeat him just as the union's hubris defeated them.
Comment: #3
Posted by: alf1052
Sat Feb 26, 2011 1:20 PM
The recent partisan battle over the budget reductions and collective bargaining may seem puzzling to many, but in fact the issue is as clear as the nose on your face.

Several years ago the well-funded right-wing think tanks realized the impact of the changing population in the U.S. and the fact that soon the majority of people will be nonwhite. The resulting strategy, paid for by billionaire sponsors such as the Koch brothers, has taken advantage of the democratic processes to fund campaigns and elect governors and legislators to complete the "hollowing-out" of the middle class in the U.S. Through a variety of advertising and public relations campaigns, voters have been persuaded to vote against their own economic interests.

This destruction of the middle class has been underway for decades, created largely by the flat wages for most workers while their corporate bosses benefited enormously from increased salaries, benefits, and wealth. As a result, most families now require two workers to maintain a middle-class standard of living; they have lost the pension benefits and health insurance coverage provided by employers in the past; and they have found their primary residence no longer a safe and reliable investment. Most middle-class families are now one illness or lay-off away from poverty because there is no extra person to go to work in an emergency, no savings to rely on, and no health insurance to provide coverage.

Middle-class workers who were once viewed as valuable assets to be educated and promoted for the good of the company are now regarded as expenses to be eliminated for the sake of profits. Government programs to provide greater opportunities for college education, art and cultural institutions, public libraries, and a clean environment are now being cut back under the threat of looming deficits -- deficits enhanced by subsidies and tax reductions to corporations and the super wealthy population.

Today, the middle class is being divided against itself in order to finally destroy its central role in American society. Those who have lost most of the benefits of middle-class life and are struggling for survival are being mobilized to fight against those public and unionized workers who have maintained some of the middle-class benefits once taken for granted or aspired to by all working people. The demise of collective bargaining will remove the last hope the middle-class has of sustaining and improving its lot in life. Without bargaining rights every worker will be at the mercy of their individual fate at the hands of bosses, or corporate titans, whose main focus is on profits for the owner and shareholders of the company.

Without a strong middle class, the U.S. will become a nation familiar in other parts of the world: a small wealthy ruling elite dominating a country made up of struggling workers and a large impoverished underclass. As in many of those countries, the ruling elite will be predominately wealthy whites and the rest will be people of color and impoverished whites.

Look at the leaders who fight for tax cuts for the wealthy and budget cuts for the middle class. It is the white (male) establishment securing its position in the face of the growth of nonwhites in the U.S. population. It's as clear as the nose on their face.

As Bob Dylan wrote many years ago: "You don't need a weatherman to know which way the wind is blowing!"
Comment: #4
Posted by: Doug Kimmel
Sun Feb 27, 2011 5:13 PM
Perhaps you should ask Republicans what they expect to pay America's bills with,Romney's good looks.They always seem to get a pass on this question.
Comment: #5
Posted by: WILLIAM KELLEY
Mon Mar 7, 2011 6:48 PM
Already have an account? Log in.
New Account  
Your Name:
Your E-mail:
Your Password:
Confirm Your Password:

Please allow a few minutes for your comment to be posted.

Enter the numbers to the right:  
Creators.com comments policy
More
Mark Shields
May. `12
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31 1 2
About the author About the author
Write the author Write the author
Printer friendly format Printer friendly format
Email to friend Email to friend
View by Month
Roland Martin
Roland S. MartinUpdated 20 Jun 2012
Marc Dion
Marc DionUpdated 28 May 2012
Steve Chapman
Steve ChapmanUpdated 27 May 2012

8 Aug 2009 August Musings

18 Oct 2008 MARK SHIELDS

31 May 2008 The Last Tough Liberal